Re: Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-13 Thread Ali Alphan Bayazit
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 15:36 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 01:07:31AM -0500, Ali Alphan Bayazit wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:06 -0600, downtime null wrote: > > > > > > mount: /dev/hdb1 already mounted or /other busy > > > > > > It also does not show up in dmesg. What co

Re: Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-13 Thread Kevin Mark
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 01:07:31AM -0500, Ali Alphan Bayazit wrote: > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:06 -0600, downtime null wrote: > > > > mount: /dev/hdb1 already mounted or /other busy > > > > It also does not show up in dmesg. What could be causing this? What > > can > > I do to fix it? > > > try

Re: Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-13 Thread downtime null
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 00:07, Ali Alphan Bayazit wrote: > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:06 -0600, downtime null wrote: > > > > mount: /dev/hdb1 already mounted or /other busy > > > > It also does not show up in dmesg. What could be causing this? What > > can > > I do to fix it? > > > try using /dev/ev

Re: Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-12 Thread Ali Alphan Bayazit
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:06 -0600, downtime null wrote: > > mount: /dev/hdb1 already mounted or /other busy > > It also does not show up in dmesg. What could be causing this? What > can > I do to fix it? > try using /dev/evms/hdb1 instead of /dev/hdb1. -- Ali Alphan Bayazit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-12 Thread downtime null
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 22:03, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:51:31PM -0600, downtime null wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:32, Kevin Mark wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:26:57PM -0600, downtime null wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:08, Kevin Mark wrote: > > > > > #

Re: Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-12 Thread Kevin Mark
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:51:31PM -0600, downtime null wrote: > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:32, Kevin Mark wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:26:57PM -0600, downtime null wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:08, Kevin Mark wrote: > > > # mount /dev/hdb1 /mnt/other > mount: /dev/hdb1 already moun

Re: Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-12 Thread downtime null
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:32, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:26:57PM -0600, downtime null wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:08, Kevin Mark wrote: > > > Disk /dev/hdb: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512

Re: Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-12 Thread Kevin Mark
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:26:57PM -0600, downtime null wrote: > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:08, Kevin Mark wrote: > Disk /dev/hdb: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > >Device Boot Start End

Re: Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-12 Thread downtime null
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 21:08, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:06:10PM -0600, downtime null wrote: > > I just finished a major update thanks to several of you and to aptitude, > > but now I can't mount my slave drive. It was working before the update, > > now it's not. The entry in /et

Re: Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-12 Thread Kevin Mark
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:06:10PM -0600, downtime null wrote: > I just finished a major update thanks to several of you and to aptitude, > but now I can't mount my slave drive. It was working before the update, > now it's not. The entry in /etc/fstab looks fine, but it's not listed in > the output

Can't mount partition on slave drive

2004-11-12 Thread downtime null
I just finished a major update thanks to several of you and to aptitude, but now I can't mount my slave drive. It was working before the update, now it's not. The entry in /etc/fstab looks fine, but it's not listed in the output of 'mount'. I also can't mount it with 'mount /dev/hdb1 /mountpoint'.

Re: mount Partition

1999-10-31 Thread Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Please try to keep lines <76 characters in length. On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, John Pearson wrote: > If you want to avoid B?IOS problems by putting all of the files needed > to boot in the first 1024 cylinders, make /dev/hdc1 smaller (10Mb > should be heaps) and mount

Re: mount Partition

1999-10-31 Thread John Pearson
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 12:18:03PM +0200, Robin Gressmann wrote > Hello, > (sorry, my english is not very good) > My problem: > I have got a large harddisk (2GB). I have make 3 partittions: > 1. 64MB for all files that need for boot Linux (in the beginning of my >harddisk) -> /dev/hdc1 > 2. 64M

Re: mount Partition

1999-10-30 Thread Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sat, 30 Oct 1999, Robin Gressmann wrote: > My problem: > I have got a large harddisk (2GB). I have make 3 partittions: > 1. 64MB for all files that need for boot Linux (in the beginning of my >harddisk) -> /dev/hdc1 This is good. You should put the follo

Re: mount Partition

1999-10-30 Thread Ingo Reimann
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 12:18:03PM +0200, Robin Gressmann wrote: > Hello, > (sorry, my english is not very good) > My problem: > I have got a large harddisk (2GB). I have make 3 partittions: > 1. 64MB for all files that need for boot Linux (in the beginning of my >harddisk) -> /dev/hdc1 > 2. 64

mount Partition

1999-10-30 Thread Robin Gressmann
Hello, (sorry, my english is not very good) My problem: I have got a large harddisk (2GB). I have make 3 partittions: 1. 64MB for all files that need for boot Linux (in the beginning of my harddisk) -> /dev/hdc1 2. 64MB Swap 3. the rest for all other files (/dev/hdc3) I do not know, how I have

Re: mount partition or disk

1999-04-13 Thread Laurent PICOULEAU
Hi On Tue, 13 Apr, 1999 à 07:54:29PM +1000, Jiri Baum wrote: > Hello, > > is there an easy (or canonical) way of (auto)detecting whether a disk is > partitioned, please? > A valid partition table must contains a signature consisting of the two bytes AA55 (or 55AA, I'm not sure) as the two last by

Re: mount partition or disk

1999-04-13 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
> > Hello, > > is there an easy (or canonical) way of (auto)detecting whether a disk is > partitioned, please? > > What I have is a SCSI magneto-optical disk drive (230MB removable disks) > and a bunch of disks. With some of the disks, I need to mount /dev/sda1, > with others /dev/sda directly.

Re: mount partition or disk

1999-04-13 Thread ktb
Jiri Baum wrote: > > Jiri Baum: > > > is there an easy (or canonical) way of (auto)detecting whether a disk is > > > partitioned, please? > > > > > > What I have is a SCSI magneto-optical disk drive (230MB removable disks) > > > and a bunch of disks. With some of the disks, I need to mount /dev/sd

Re: mount partition or disk

1999-04-13 Thread Jiri Baum
Jiri Baum: > > is there an easy (or canonical) way of (auto)detecting whether a disk is > > partitioned, please? > > > > What I have is a SCSI magneto-optical disk drive (230MB removable disks) > > and a bunch of disks. With some of the disks, I need to mount /dev/sda1, > > with others /dev/sda di

Re: mount partition or disk

1999-04-13 Thread ktb
Jiri Baum wrote: > > Hello, > > is there an easy (or canonical) way of (auto)detecting whether a disk is > partitioned, please? > > What I have is a SCSI magneto-optical disk drive (230MB removable disks) > and a bunch of disks. With some of the disks, I need to mount /dev/sda1, > with others /d

mount partition or disk

1999-04-13 Thread Jiri Baum
Hello, is there an easy (or canonical) way of (auto)detecting whether a disk is partitioned, please? What I have is a SCSI magneto-optical disk drive (230MB removable disks) and a bunch of disks. With some of the disks, I need to mount /dev/sda1, with others /dev/sda directly. (The disks have ex