Re: Moo! (WAS Re: upgrade only if installed)

2006-06-14 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:15, Felix C. Stegerman wrote: > * Kelly Clowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-15 00:49]: > > try "apt-get moo" > > then "aptitude moo" > > then "aptitude moo -v" > > then "aptitude moo -vv" &g

Re: Moo! (WAS Re: upgrade only if installed)

2006-06-14 Thread Felix C. Stegerman
* Kelly Clowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-15 00:49]: > try "apt-get moo" > then "aptitude moo" > then "aptitude moo -v" > then "aptitude moo -vv" > and so on Now that was funny! - Felix -- Felix C. Stegerman <[EMAIL PR

Re: Moo! (WAS Re: upgrade only if installed)

2006-06-14 Thread Kelly Clowers
at apt-get was "more advanced," and thus would be preferable. This: http://www.eeggs.com/items/36008.html supports the "more advanced" theory, in that apt-get can do dist-upgrades. Can aptitude as well? Even if it is geek humor, why does one have super cow powers and not the othe

Moo! (WAS Re: upgrade only if installed)

2006-06-14 Thread Joshua J. Kugler
Wow...here's a silly one for the archives. On Wednesday 14 June 2006 13:46, Bill Thompson wrote: > In addition, the command "aptitude" is now recommended in place of > "apt-get". The aptitude program handles package dependencies better > than the apt-get program. When you do apt-get --help, at th

Re: moo

2003-01-29 Thread Pigeon
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:05:49AM -0600, will trillich wrote: > $ apt-get moo >(__) >(oo) > /--\/ > / ||| >* /\---/\ > ~~ ~~ > "Have you mooed today?"... >

Re: moo

2003-01-28 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:05:49AM -0600, will trillich wrote: | $ apt-get moo |(__) |(oo) | /--\/ | / ||| |* /\---/\ | ~~ ~~ | "Have you mooed today?"... | | can't say that i

moo

2003-01-28 Thread will trillich
$ apt-get moo (__) (oo) /--\/ / ||| * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ "Have you mooed today?"... can't say that i have. this is almost as cute as some of those mac easter eggs. w