Yes. It is really weird, that you had it in the .config but there was
absolutely nothing about the agp in the dmesg!?
From your trials it seems that the module gets laoded and your chipset
is supported by the kernel, so everything should be ok from the AGP
point of view. Also I think it means tha
Sorry about the delay in my reply :( My ISP did something with the
address space and the ip-address, I had for a long time, changed to
something else. I really need to start working on a script which would
take care of the settings in the case where my ip-address changes...
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at
hi,
so i recompiled kernel without IOMMU and selected CONFIG_AGP and
CONFIG_AGP_AMD64 to be compiled as modules
What does dmesg say about agp?
now i get
Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones
agpgart: Detected AGP bridge 0
agpgart: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xc8000
agpgart and amd64_
At least 2.6.14 has something for the K8T890. You can just `grep -i
k8t890 /usr/src/linux/drivers/char/agp/amd64-agp.c` to see if it is in
the 2.6.12.
it seems to me that the only way how to get these modules is to DISABLE
IOMMU support. with IOMMU enabled i wasn't able to compile them as
module
Hmm, that is weird!
yes, it is!
Yes I think it is ok. Unfortunately I don't have any further info about
IOMMU, but the help for IOMMU says that it includes a driver for the AMD
Opteron/Athlon64 IOMMU, so I guess that you can have agp driver for AMD
on-CPU GART with or without IOMMU.
ok, it's c
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 06:03:24PM +0200, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
> hi,
>
> >What does dmesg say about agp?
> actually, nothing... it's weird, because agpgart should be compiled into
> the kernel
Hmm, that is weird!
> >In my AMD64 the AGP comes from:
> >Device Drivers --->
> > Character devices --
hi,
What does dmesg say about agp?
actually, nothing... it's weird, because agpgart should be compiled into
the kernel
In my AMD64 the AGP comes from:
Device Drivers --->
Character devices --->
/dev/agpgart (AGP Support)
AMD Opteron/Athlon64 on-CPU GART support
If I have
Process
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:46:03AM +0200, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
> hi guys,
Hi,
> i'm running testing on my amd64 and i updated to kernel 2.6.12 (via
> dselect). i selected to compile drm and dri as modules (i want hw
> acceleration of my ati radeon x600 card). compilation went fine, the new
> ker
Florian Dorpmueller wrote:
my .config file contains
CONFIG_AGP=y
CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=y
CONFIG_DRM=m
CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=m
Try CONFIG_DRM=y
i'll try. however, why should this solve the problem? in 2.6.11 DRM
compiled as a module worked ok...
regards,
--
Lubos
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
To UNSUBSCRI
my .config file contains
CONFIG_AGP=y
CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=y
CONFIG_DRM=m
CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=m
Try CONFIG_DRM=y
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi guys,
i'm running testing on my amd64 and i updated to kernel 2.6.12 (via
dselect). i selected to compile drm and dri as modules (i want hw
acceleration of my ati radeon x600 card). compilation went fine, the new
kernel works ok. however, i cannot get hw acceleration to work.
the 2 modules
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 10:28:29 +0530, Nayyar Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:57:17 +0200, Eduard Pauna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hello to all
> >
> > I've just install the debian using the debian-installer (or at least
> > I've tried). I've booted from hd the installer
hello to all
I've just install the debian using the debian-installer (or at least
I've tried). I've booted from hd the installer using lilo. It's
installing ok, it loads my ethernet card module - 8139too into the
install process but when I reboot and enter the fresh debian I cannot
load anymore th
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 16:54, Alan Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:26:29AM +, Nic Strong wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ever since compiling 2.4.20 kernel and the nvidia module/glx (4191)
> > whenever I start x the nvidia module does not auto load i have to do an
> > explicit 'insmod nvidi
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:26:29AM +, Nic Strong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ever since compiling 2.4.20 kernel and the nvidia module/glx (4191)
> whenever I start x the nvidia module does not auto load i have to do an
> explicit 'insmod nvidia' (i never had to do this in the past).
>
> /etc/modules has
Perhaps a stupid question, since your system seemed to work before you
used 2.4.20.
I think it is X that loads the kernel when reading the XF86Config.
What does your XF86config contain?
Mine has
Section "Device"
Identifier "NVIDIA Corporation GeForce2 Go [NV11]"
Driver
I'm running 2.4.20/woody/nv(4191) and mine works fine, the only
difference I can see is that I didn't bother with any of the aliases.
I just have this in /etc/modules
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are
# to be load
Hi,
Ever since compiling 2.4.20 kernel and the nvidia module/glx (4191)
whenever I start x the nvidia module does not auto load i have to do an
explicit 'insmod nvidia' (i never had to do this in the past).
/etc/modules has the following lines:
### update-modules: start processing /etc/modutils/
18 matches
Mail list logo
