On 10/14/2007 06:34 AM, Georgi Alexandrov wrote:
> Michael Shuler wrote:
>> The package is libapache-mod-ssl - install that, then run 'a2enmod ssl'
>> to enable the module in your apache configuration.
>
> That's wrong. ssl is included in the apache2 packages
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 02:34:40PM +0300, Georgi Alexandrov wrote:
> > The package is libapache-mod-ssl - install that, then run 'a2enmod ssl'
> > to enable the module in your apache configuration.
> >
>
> That's wrong. ssl is included in the apache2 packa
Michael Shuler wrote:
> On 10/11/2007 02:30 PM, Robert Cates wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> am I wrong - there's no (mod-) ssl package for the etch apache 2.2
>> server? I can I get my apache 2.2 server ssl enabled? Or do I need to
>> install/use the apache 1.3 pac
On 10/11/2007 02:30 PM, Robert Cates wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> am I wrong - there's no (mod-) ssl package for the etch apache 2.2
> server? I can I get my apache 2.2 server ssl enabled? Or do I need to
> install/use the apache 1.3 package for ssl support?
The package is libapac
Hi all,
am I wrong - there's no (mod-) ssl package for the etch apache 2.2
server? I can I get my apache 2.2 server ssl enabled? Or do I need to
install/use the apache 1.3 package for ssl support?
Thanks for your help,
Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 13:15 +0100, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> i installed apache-ssl on my linux sarge
>
> i see:
>
> libapache-mod-ssl (Strong cryptography (HTTPS support) for Apache)
> libapache-mod-auth-pam - Apache module to authenticate web access using
Hi all :-)
i installed apache-ssl on my linux sarge
i see:
libapache-mod-ssl (Strong cryptography (HTTPS support) for Apache)
libapache-mod-auth-pam - Apache module to authenticate web access using PAM
libapache-mod-auth-kerb - Apache module for Kerberos authentication
which i should use 4 do
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 15:13, Deron Wilkerson wrote:
> I'm running Apache 1.3.31 on Sarge with the mod-ssl. I cannot get ssl to work.
> when I try apachectl startssl it gives me a list of the options and startssl
> is not one of them. Do I need a new apachectl script. And where woul
I'm running Apache 1.3.31 on Sarge with the mod-ssl. I cannot get ssl to work.
when I try apachectl startssl it gives me a list of the options and startssl
is not one of them. Do I need a new apachectl script. And where would I find
one?
Thanks in advance.
--
Deron D. Wilkerson
Express
Danny O'Brien wrote:
Thanks for the response. I took the action you suggested -- but I
didn't delete the previous /etc/apache/httpd.conf file. Now, instead
of showing my site on a Web page, my browser treats the main PHP page
as a file download and dumps the file to my desktop.
Should I remo
strauch, David wrote:
-Original Message-
From:Danny O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:19 PM
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Web server with PHP setup & mod-ssl
- does "apt-get upgrade" always provide the most secure versions? The
s up to 0.9.6 "l" -- 0.9.6 "c" also seems ancient.
- My previous build ran mod-ssl. However, there is no mod-ssl package
in Debian. Has anyone installed mod-ssl under Debian, or is there a
better program for this function?
TIA
- Danny O'Brien
Unless you want to venture i
e the most secure versions? The
> reason I ask is:
>
> - Apache 1.3.26 seems ancient -- is this an OK version to run? I have
> executed apt-get upgrade, and apt.conf is set for "stable."
>
> - also, openssl is up to 0.9.6 "l" -- 0.9.6 "c" also seems ancien
-Original Message-From: Danny O'Brien
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004
12:19 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Web
server with PHP setup & mod-ssl
- does
"apt-get upgrade" always provide the most secure versions? The
t; also seems ancient.
We patch security problems in older versions in the stable suite rather
than upgrading them wholesale. See:
http://www.debian.org/security/faq#version
You can look in /usr/share/doc//changelog.Debian.gz to find a
record of these changes as applied.
> - My previous
; -- 0.9.6 "c" also seems ancient.
- My previous build ran mod-ssl. However, there is no mod-ssl package in Debian. Has anyone installed mod-ssl under Debian, or is there a better program for this function?
TIA
- Danny O'Brien
> Lynn
> My first post to this list.
Nice of you to join us :)
--
.''`. Paul William
: :' :Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
"Lynn W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My question is, given my httpd.conf settings for PHP4 and ColdFusion,
> should I apt-get apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?
Yes, one of those is probably what you want. :-) You might look at
the respective upstream Web pages (htt
s no need for you to install
SSL separately. However, if you do want to run SSL for other purposes
aside than Webmin, than yes you are correct, you do need something else.
I have pretty much the same set up that you have mentioned below on my
computer and I am using libapache-mod-ssl, it was ver
realised I should perhaps have SSL installed for
> Apache.
>
> My question is, given my httpd.conf settings for PHP4 and ColdFusion,
> should I apt-get apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?
>
> Many thanks!
> Lynn
My first post to this list.
Webmin has its own http server. Y
on is, given my httpd.conf settings for PHP4 and ColdFusion,
should I apt-get apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?
Many thanks!
Lynn
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
I also find it something of an advantage to have a fairly unified
configuration; If you run mod-ssl, or use apache-ssl to also run your main
site with the SSLDisable option set, you can easily make sure that the 95%
of the configuration that should be identical doesn't have to be verified
Hello:
Any help that anyone can give me or if you can at least point me in the
right direction I would really appreciate it. I installed
libapache-mod-ssl (on a debian system) last week and I haven't been able
to get it to work. I got to the section in the readme file (from the
libapache-mo
>>system to his webshop so i have to deploy a ssl-enabled webserver on the
> >>same machine. the question is now if i would upgrade the already running
> >>apache with mod-ssl or rather install an independent ssl-enabled apache.
> >>i would feel slightliy better wit
e the already running
apache with mod-ssl or rather install an independent ssl-enabled apache.
i would feel slightliy better with the two-independent-packages approach
but i could be missing something. could anyone experienced with this
tell me about some pros and cons i might have forgot to consider
upgrade the already running
> apache with mod-ssl or rather install an independent ssl-enabled apache.
> i would feel slightliy better with the two-independent-packages approach
> but i could be missing something. could anyone experienced with this
> tell me about some pros and cons i m
hi list,
i'm running a webserver for a client who wants to add an online payment
system to his webshop so i have to deploy a ssl-enabled webserver on the
same machine. the question is now if i would upgrade the already running
apache with mod-ssl or rather install an independent ssl-en
* dirs) and separate logs. The
> > don't conflict with each other.
>
> why would it be bad to have apache-perl with libapache-mod-ssl
> active? that way if your login area does heavy mod_perl stuff
> similar to the public mod_perl stuff, you won't have to maintain
>
d the other listening for https on
> > port, umm... 443 I think it was.
>
> Right. You will run two Apache servers. They have separate
> configs (separate /etc/apache* dirs) and separate logs. The
> don't conflict with each other.
why would it be bad to have apache-perl wit
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:05:37PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * ScruLoose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030602 21:22]:
> >
> > I have a single, dynamic IP address; so my domain is accessed through
> > dynDNS. According to the mod-ssl manual, I canNOT solve this using
>
* ScruLoose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030602 21:22]:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've got apache 1.3 installed and running pretty much "straight out of
> the box", and I have mod-ssl installed but not configured yet.
> On a Woody box, that is.
>
> I want to have regular
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:03:04AM -0400, ScruLoose wrote:
> So I *think* what I need to do is to have two separate invocations of
> apache running all the time: one listening for http on port 80 and the
> other listening for https on port, umm... 443 I think it was.
Right. You will run two Apach
Hi everybody,
I've got apache 1.3 installed and running pretty much "straight out of
the box", and I have mod-ssl installed but not configured yet.
On a Woody box, that is.
I want to have regular http access to most of the stuff on my server,
but also a "private" area
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021212 03:34]:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:44:37AM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> > Has anybody put together a good, clean way to get mod_ssl to use the
> > /usr/lib/i586/libssl.so.0.9.6 in order to gain that 2x speed boost?
>
> I was under the strong impression
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:44:37AM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> Has anybody put together a good, clean way to get mod_ssl to use the
> /usr/lib/i586/libssl.so.0.9.6 in order to gain that 2x speed boost?
I was under the strong impression that the dynamic loader (since well
before woody at least) lo
Evenin'
Has anybody put together a good, clean way to get mod_ssl to use the
/usr/lib/i586/libssl.so.0.9.6 in order to gain that 2x speed boost?
Is there a better way than either LD_LIBRARY_PATH or replacing the
/usr/lib/lib{ssl,crypto}... with the i586 versions (or symlinks
thereto)? Etiher way
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 17:47:42 +0100, Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Right now I'm using apache-ssl, but I noticed that it is something
> different from apache + libapache-mod-ssl.
>
> What is not clear to me is exactly how the two options differ and what the
> relative pros and con
Hello.
Right now I'm using apache-ssl, but I noticed that it is something different
from apache + libapache-mod-ssl.
What is not clear to me is exactly how the two options differ and what the
relative pros and cons of each choice are. Could anyone shed some light,
please?
TIA,
Andrea.
I posted this a couple of days ago and didn't get any
response ... thought I'd try again in case a clueful
mod-ssl user had simply missed it. I've tried a few
different things, but I'm basically at the same point.
--- Richard Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can&
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:53:10PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:48:05 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> >What is the difference (when would one use what) between
> >libapache-mod-ssl, and apache-ssl? Is one of these "new", since the
> >
On Fri, 24 May 2002 09:52:49 -0400, Ian D. Stewart wrote:
[...]
>Just based on the package names, I would guess that the latter uses the
>Apache module structure, whereas the former has SSL support compiled
>into the main executable.
This is correct. I know it since I've used both.
>
On 2002.05.24 09:53 Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:48:05 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
>What is the difference (when would one use what) between
>libapache-mod-ssl, and apache-ssl? Is one of these "new", since the
>"crypto-in-main" transition? (I
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:48:05 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
>What is the difference (when would one use what) between
>libapache-mod-ssl, and apache-ssl? Is one of these "new", since the
>"crypto-in-main" transition? (I only noticed the -mod-ssl one today,
>
What is the difference (when would one use what) between
libapache-mod-ssl, and apache-ssl? Is one of these "new", since the
"crypto-in-main" transition? (I only noticed the -mod-ssl one today,
I've used apache-ssl in the past.)
Thanks,
Hugo van der Merwe
--
To UNS
and then install the
>libapache-mod-ssl that I have ?
Hmm, libapache-mod-ssl_2.4.10-1.3.9-1.deb is available for
potato in debian-non-US, I just checked.
Mike.
--
Computers are useless, they only give answers. --Pablo Picasso
I can only find the ones compiled for apache 1.3.22, I am running the
apache that came with potato. Should I get the source for libapache and
apache or should I be upgrading apache somehow and then install the
libapache-mod-ssl that I have ?
Thanks
Geoffrey
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 06:26:22PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 04:22:11PM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> > i have mod_perl working like a dream -- and i'd like to add
> > mod_ssl, so:
> [ snip ]
>
> Welcome to the wonderful world of
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 04:22:11PM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> i have mod_perl working like a dream -- and i'd like to add
> mod_ssl, so:
>
> # apt-get -d install libapache-mod-ssl
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The fol
On Monday 10 September 2001 12:47, will trillich wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:00:41AM +0800, MunFai wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I am trying to sign my own server.crt file for use with Apache. I am
> > using Debian, with OpenSSL 0.9.6b-1.
> > I seem to be running into a problem when I'm running sign.s
On Monday 10 September 2001 12:47, will trillich wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:00:41AM +0800, MunFai wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I am trying to sign my own server.crt file for use with Apache. I am
> > using Debian, with OpenSSL 0.9.6b-1.
> > I seem to be running into a problem when I'm running sign.s
I had the exact same problem when trying to work with the debs.
Ultimatly I ended up just having to download the apache, mod_ssl, mod_perl,
and open_ssl sources and build them all by hand.
It was the only way to get them all to play nicely :)
Sorry, I dont remember the procedure I used, this was
i have mod_perl working like a dream -- and i'd like to add
mod_ssl, so:
# apt-get -d install libapache-mod-ssl
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
apache
The following packages will be REMOVED:
a
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:00:41AM +0800, MunFai wrote:
> Hi!
> I am trying to sign my own server.crt file for use with Apache. I am using
> Debian, with OpenSSL 0.9.6b-1.
> I seem to be running into a problem when I'm running sign.sh to sign the
> .csr file. This is what I get:
>
> sblabs:/etc/apa
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 01:18:03PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
> A little while ago, Hans (obviously from Northern Germany--moin
> moin!) asked whether it was "better" to use mod-ssl or apache-ssl.
> That question wasn't really answered.
>
> Are there any
e-ssl too, or
required to *not* add the features (to keep it "stable"), or is it
optional?
If it's the latter two, I think running apache + mod-ssl would be
the most flexible, allowing my apache install to take advantage of
future updates. Right?
--
Bill Wohler <[EMA
Am 26. Aug, 2001 schwäzte Erdmut Pfeifer so:
> In terms of practical usability, I'd say no -- at least I wouldn't
> know of any. If you search the web for differences between the two SSL
> implementations, about the only thing you'll find is a difference in
> philosophy: apache-ssl is primarily fo
Hi!
I am trying to sign my own server.crt file for use with Apache. I am using
Debian, with OpenSSL 0.9.6b-1.
I seem to be running into a problem when I'm running sign.sh to sign the
.csr file. This is what I get:
sblabs:/etc/apache/ssl.crt# ./sign.sg server.csr
CA signing: server.csr -> server.crt
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 01:18:03PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
> A little while ago, Hans (obviously from Northern Germany--moin
> moin!) asked whether it was "better" to use mod-ssl or apache-ssl.
> That question wasn't really answered.
>
> Since libapache-
A little while ago, Hans (obviously from Northern Germany--moin
moin!) asked whether it was "better" to use mod-ssl or apache-ssl.
That question wasn't really answered.
Since libapache-mod-jk only attaches itself to apache, I'm now
considering apache (with mod-ssl) o
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 13:25:09 +1100, John Griffiths wrote:
> #apt-get install libapache-mod-ssl
> what do I need to configure?
That is explained in libapache-mod-ssl-doc, in particular its README.Debian.
HTH,
Ray
--
PATRIOTISM A great British writer once said that if he had to
G'day
I set up a new box (everything was fine) and ran
#apt-get install libapache-mod-ssl
it clunked and whirred and got on with the job, bringing down a bunch of stuff
and not asking me to do anything.
Apache is running fine but when I try to connect to https I get nothing.
what do I
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 17:51:52 -0500, MaD dUCK wrote:
> so i established my own certificate authority and have a server
> certification - and now i would like to create a new server
> certificate, signed by the same ca. however, when i do
> mod-ssl-makecert
It appears mod-ssl-mak
so i established my own certificate authority and have a server
certification - and now i would like to create a new server
certificate, signed by the same ca. however, when i do
mod-ssl-makecert, i get:
diamond:/etc/apache# mod-ssl-makecert
What type of certificate do you want to create ?
1
; Is it legal to use mod-ssl (or apache-ssl) in the US for commercial
> purposes? I've seen some conflicting documentation on the matter (and it
> seems like I heard laws changed regarding this recently as well???). Also,
> is using mod-ssl or apache-ssl as secure as one of the secure
I asked this a week or so ago, but it was a day that the mailing list was
having trouble, so I wonder if many people received it. So, I'm asking
again. My apologies to those who got it the first time.
Is it legal to use mod-ssl (or apache-ssl) in the US for commercial
purposes? I've
Is it legal to use mod-ssl (or apache-ssl) in the US for commercial
purposes? I've seen some conflicting documentation on the matter (and it
seems like I heard laws changed regarding this recently as well???). Also,
is using mod-ssl or apache-ssl as secure as one of the secure commercial
a
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:08:43 +0100, Igor Mozetic wrote:
[...]
>Install libapache-mod-ssl-doc - this contains very nice documentation.
Thank you very much for pointing me at this package, and it's "parent" package
"libapache-mod-ssl" which I was totally unware
I'm trying to get libapache-mod-ssl working.
When I try to connect via https to the server, Netscape tells me that
there's some strange network error or that the server is misconfigured
basically, that the response came back garbled. So, I found this on
DejaNews:
6.1.3) I do
68 matches
Mail list logo
