Re: mkboot -- "if GRUB is installed it does nothing .."

2007-10-21 Thread cga2000
C64D80AE; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:08:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:08:45 -0400 From: Bugs in WWW-Mechanize via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [rt.cpan.org #30163] AutoReply: mkboot -- "if GRUB is installed it does nothing .." In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PRO

Re: mkboot -- "if GRUB is installed it does nothing .."

2007-10-21 Thread cga2000
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 10:59:03AM EDT, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > Package grub-doc Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mkboot -- "if GRUB is installed it does nothing .."

2007-10-21 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
oot floppies are now a > > > thing of the past? > > > > > > Or are there circumstances when making a boot floppy is still advisable? > > > > > > If so, since mkboot appears to require lilo, what's the alternative for > > > us grub guys? &

Re: mkboot -- "if GRUB is installed it does nothing .."

2007-10-21 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Douglas A. Tutty wrote: Does this mean that with everyone coming up with their improved "rescue disks" and floppy drives becoming a rarity, boot floppies are now a thing of the past? Or are there circumstances when making a boot floppy is still advisable? If so, since mkboot

Re: mkboot -- "if GRUB is installed it does nothing .."

2007-10-20 Thread cga2000
are there circumstances when making a boot floppy is still advisable? > > > > If so, since mkboot appears to require lilo, what's the alternative for > > us grub guys? > > With 2.6 kernels being so big, plus needing an initrd, I haven't seen an > acutal boot flopp

Re: mkboot -- "if GRUB is installed it does nothing .."

2007-10-20 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
> Does this mean that with everyone coming up with their improved "rescue > disks" and floppy drives becoming a rarity, boot floppies are now a > thing of the past? > > Or are there circumstances when making a boot floppy is still advisable? > > If so, since

mkboot -- "if GRUB is installed it does nothing .."

2007-10-20 Thread cga2000
This is what "man mkboot" tells me. "If GRUB is installed, it does nothing. If LILO is in use, it runs /sbin/lilo. If SILO is installed, it does nothing. Otherwise, mkboot will make a new bootdisk." Well that's not true. lilo is not installed on this system and yet

Re: mkboot with grub

2005-06-03 Thread Vegard|drageV
> No problem with lilo, but if you like grub: > -format a floppy > -cd /floppy > -mkdir /doc > -mkdir /grub > -mkdir /pict > cp .. stage1 /floppy/grub/ > cp .. stage2 /floppy/grub/ > create and edit a file menu.lst as follows: > > splashimage (fd0)/boot/grub/images/linuxinside.xpm.gz > >

Re: mkboot with grub

2005-06-03 Thread mess-mate
Vegard|drageV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | When trying to make a bootfloppy, I get this output: | | hjem:/home/vegard# mkboot /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.8-2-686 | | Insert a floppy diskette into your boot drive, and press . | | Creating a lilo bootdisk... | Kernel is at /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.8-2-

mkboot with grub

2005-06-02 Thread Vegard|drageV
When trying to make a bootfloppy, I get this output: hjem:/home/vegard# mkboot /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.8-2-686 Insert a floppy diskette into your boot drive, and press . Creating a lilo bootdisk... Kernel is at /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.8-2-686 in /boot Matching initrd image is /boot/initrd.img-2.6.8-2-686

Re: Floppy too smal for mkboot

2004-11-23 Thread Jerry Turba
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:30:16 +0100, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 07:35 -0800, Jerry Turba wrote: >> I have installed the 2.6.8 kernel and it is working fine, but I cannot >> create a new boot disk for it (mkboot) because it complains that it runs >> out of

Re: Floppy too smal for mkboot

2004-11-23 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 07:35 -0800, Jerry Turba wrote: > I have installed the 2.6.8 kernel and it is working fine, but I cannot > create a new boot disk for it (mkboot) because it complains that it runs > out of space. > Is there a way to create a boot disk in this situation? is

Floppy too smal for mkboot

2004-11-23 Thread Jerry Turba
I have installed the 2.6.8 kernel and it is working fine, but I cannot create a new boot disk for it (mkboot) because it complains that it runs out of space. Is there a way to create a boot disk in this situation? Thanks Jerry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: mkboot

2003-07-22 Thread Keith O'Connell
> > I have now worked out the answer to this and feel a bit silly. > What is the answer? This is a bit odd. Posting a question, then having to supply the answer :-) Ii seems to be that mkboot does not deal with the initrd component of the kernel, and so when you boot a floppy

Re: mkboot

2003-07-22 Thread Rudy Gevaert
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:49:00PM +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote: > I have now worked out the answer to this and feel a bit silly.(doh!) What is the answer? -- Rudy Gevaert[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web pagehttp://www.webworm.org GNU/Linux user and Savannah hac

Re: mkboot

2003-07-21 Thread Keith O'Connell
> I wanted to make a boot disk, prior to experimenting with the compiling of kernels. > > I ran mkboot /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-k7, and the disk was created. > > I rebooted and the floppy started to boot up, until it hit a kernel panic. The error > message was; > >

mkboot

2003-07-21 Thread Keith O'Connell
hi, I wanted to make a boot disk, prior to experimenting with the compiling of kernels. I ran mkboot /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-k7, and the disk was created. I rebooted and the floppy started to boot up, until it hit a kernel panic. The error message was; Root fs not mounted VPS

Re: Are there bugs in mkboot? Need another pair of eyes.

2003-06-12 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Chris Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030612 07:52]: > > > Hi. mkboot (part of the debianutils package) appears to be bugged to me, > both in use and in looking at the code. But I've looked in BTS and in > /usr/share/doc/debianutils, and have searched web, usenet, and mai

Are there bugs in mkboot? Need another pair of eyes.

2003-06-12 Thread Chris Metzler
Hi. I posted this a week and a half ago and didn't see much response, so I figured I'd try one more time before filing bugs on debianutils. Hi. mkboot (part of the debianutils package) appears to be bugged to me, both in use and in looking at the code. But I've looked in

Re: Is mkboot bugged? Need another pair of eyes.

2003-06-06 Thread Ben Kal
On 3 Jun 2003 Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. mkboot (part of the debianutils package) appears to be bugged to me, > both in use and in looking at the code. But I've looked in BTS and in > /usr/share/doc/debianutils, and have searched web, usenet, and mailing

Is mkboot bugged? Need another pair of eyes.

2003-06-04 Thread Chris Metzler
Hi. mkboot (part of the debianutils package) appears to be bugged to me, both in use and in looking at the code. But I've looked in BTS and in /usr/share/doc/debianutils, and have searched web, usenet, and mailing list archives, and haven't turned up anything. Since I'm almost

Re: mkboot w/ bzImage?

2002-11-10 Thread David Z Maze
Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just recompiled my kernel under debian woody. I would like to make > boot floppy for it. So.. I typed 'mkboot > /usr/src/.../arch/i386/boot/bzImage'. It made the floppy, but when I > reboot with floppy - it doesn't

mkboot w/ bzImage?

2002-11-09 Thread Debian User
I just recompiled my kernel under debian woody. I would like to make boot floppy for it. So.. I typed 'mkboot /usr/src/.../arch/i386/boot/bzImage'. It made the floppy, but when I reboot with floppy - it doesn't work. The kernel appears to load, but then the screen blanks ou

mkboot

2002-09-21 Thread Marek
Hi I installed a new kernel with apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-686 I tried to make a boot disk with "mkboot /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-686" and various other oprions but it does not boot, get a kernel panic with "root="

Re: MKBOOT problems

2001-01-05 Thread Xucaen
ng the drive as read-only? > > > >--- Tom Schuetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > >> Thanks to everyone for the ongoing responses > to > >> my newbie dreck. > >> > >> Why, when I MKBOOT VMLINUZ-2.2.12, would the > >> system come back

Re: MKBOOT problems

2001-01-05 Thread cls/cs
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:42:04AM -0800, Tom Schuetz wrote: > Thanks to everyone for the ongoing responses to my newbie dreck. > > Why, when I MKBOOT VMLINUZ-2.2.12, would the system come back to me on three > different BRAND NEW disks with a "write protected or other erro

MKBOOT problems

2001-01-05 Thread Tom Schuetz
Thanks to everyone for the ongoing responses to my newbie dreck. Why, when I MKBOOT VMLINUZ-2.2.12, would the system come back to me on three different BRAND NEW disks with a "write protected or other error"? I really doubt it's the disks. Is there a known problem with that version?

Re: mkboot

2000-12-01 Thread Andrea Vettorello
Andrew McRobert wrote: > hi all > > Can anyone tell me a reliable way to make a boot disk? I've tried the > mkboot util, and I have to say it's pretty average - it hasn't > successfully booted a disk, only get's to: > > "LILO boot: > Loading linu

Re: mkboot

2000-11-26 Thread Dean
Hi Andrew: Maybe this will help. go to: http://www.toms.net/rb/ for an emergency boot disk. hth Dean Andrew McRobert wrote: hi all Can anyone tell me a reliable way to make a boot disk? I've tried the mkboot util, and I have to say it's pretty average - it hasn't succes

mkboot

2000-11-25 Thread Andrew McRobert
hi all Can anyone tell me a reliable way to make a boot disk? I've tried the mkboot util, and I have to say it's pretty average - it hasn't successfully booted a disk, only get's to: "LILO boot: Loading linux" and dies ... I'm pretty sure there's a wa

mkboot 'No such file or directory"

2000-08-31 Thread Richard Robbie
Title: mkboot 'No such file or directory" I am unable to successully execute "mkboot".  I logged on as "root" and encounter the following problems. Case 1: "mkboot vmlinuz" - produces the following <><><><><><><&