Re: Fwd: Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-10 Thread Mike
MaD dUCK wrote: > set rant=on > > somebody please explain to me why this message, posted on 05 Mar 2001: > Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6]) > by sm3.texas.rr.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id f25KlGU16552 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 14

Re: Fwd: Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-09 Thread brian moore
(wonders why debian-user was copied on the reply, when I didn't post there... but what the hell, since you seem to think it's crucial for the whole world to see) On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:25:08PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote: > also sprach brian moore (on Fri, 09 Mar 2001 10:31:53AM -0800): > > Are

Re: Fwd: Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-09 Thread MaD dUCK
also sprach brian moore (on Fri, 09 Mar 2001 10:31:53AM -0800): > Are you [EMAIL PROTECTED] obviously not. > Temporary? No, the mail was sent to an address at rr.com, why would it > go to madduck.net? > > > the worst - i think i even received this message at one point. what's > > going on??? >

Fwd: Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-09 Thread MaD dUCK
set rant=on somebody please explain to me why this message, posted on 05 Mar 2001: Received: from c241983-a.stcla1.sfba.home.com (HELO mickey.lan.aokiconsulting.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2001 20:15:36 - was handed off by murphy to a micro$oft server:

Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-05 Thread MaD dUCK
also sprach Osamu Aoki (on Mon, 05 Mar 2001 12:28:29PM -0800): > I guess this is to /etc/modutils/aliases. yes > But who is responsible making this entry? Me or some postinst script? nope. you are dealing with kernel options. that's underneath debian. so it's all you. > I only edit /etc/mod

Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-05 Thread Osamu Aoki
Thanks guys. I guess this is to /etc/modutils/aliases. But who is responsible making this entry? Me or some postinst script? I only edit /etc/modules to enable some modules manually (scsi-ide,...) but I was not anticipating to do this manually to /etc/modutils/aliases. I thought that was o

Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-05 Thread Ilya Martynov
> "OA" == Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: OA> Since this is fresh install, this should not happen, I guess. OA> Which paxckage is responsible with this problem of missing "rtc"? I also see it on stratup with my customized kernel. I belive it happens when startup script setups l

Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-05 Thread MaD dUCK
also sprach Osamu Aoki (on Mon, 05 Mar 2001 08:47:50AM -0800): > Which paxckage is responsible with this problem of missing "rtc"? > > Anyother package? > Boot floppy(IDE)? it's a kernel option. i have rtc as a module and then alias char-major-10-135 rtc in my /etc/modutils somewhere. martin

Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-05 Thread Osamu Aoki
wrote: > > I just installed fresh woody system using 2 potato floppies. It was > > smooth for testing but now I get missing char-major-10-135 when I > > reboot. > >ls -l /dev/* |grep '^c.*10,.*135' shows rtc > -- -- + Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROT

Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-05 Thread mike polniak
Osamu Aoki wrote: > I just installed fresh woody system using 2 potato floppies. It was > smooth for testing but now I get missing char-major-10-135 when I > reboot. > ls -l /dev/* |grep '^c.*10,.*135' shows rtc -- LINUX~~nobody owns it~~everybody can use it~~anybody can improve it ~~~

missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-05 Thread Osamu Aoki
I just installed fresh woody system using 2 potato floppies. It was smooth for testing but now I get missing char-major-10-135 when I reboot. Any idea. Do I need to makenod? Osamu -- + Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D + + Fingerprint: 814E BD64 3288 40E7 E88E