On Friday, 16 September 2022 13:25:06 CEST, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I did find this paragraph in systemd.exec(5):
me, too. if i run into a problem, the first thing i do is to read. and,
yes: i do read even man pages! ;)
Maybe you can find a workaround there, and/or contribute your workaround
On Friday, 16 September 2022 14:10:01 CEST, Frank wrote:
Apparently this has already been 'fixed' for bookworm. [...]
so, this issue is known and 'they' did something about it.
Maybe file a bug report to have this added for bullseye?
since this issue is known, 'they' should be aware of it,
On Fri 16 Sep 2022 at 09:17:10 (+0200), Michael wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 September 2022 13:01:45 CEST, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> of course the first thing i did was to check if all the files from the
> package were as they should be, and everything was fine!
>
> > It's supposed to be created as ne
Op 16-09-2022 om 09:17 schreef Michael:
with ssh@.service it is completely different. for each connection there
is a dedicated sshd process being started, and each one of them has the
same /run/sshd directory assigned. and that's the problem if you have
more than one connection to a given host. a
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 09:17:10AM +0200, Michael wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 September 2022 13:01:45 CEST, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > unicorn:/lib/systemd/system$ grep RuntimeDirectory ssh@.service
> > RuntimeDirectory=sshd
> > RuntimeDirectoryMode=0755
> with ssh@.service it is completely different.
I've been hit by this too. Likewise I haven't deliberately
configured sshd for socket activation nor tampered with
unit files. In my case the host was a newly imaged raspberry
pi using the images linked from the Debian Wiki. I haven't
done any further investigation.
--
Jonathan Dowland
https://j
On Thursday, 15 September 2022 13:01:45 CEST, Greg Wooledge wrote:
of course the first thing i did was to check if all the files from the
package were as they should be, and everything was fine!
It's supposed to be created as needed. There should be two lines in
the unit file:
unicorn:/lib
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 12:02:21PM +0200, Michael wrote:
> i recently had problems to reach some of my host with ssh. as it turned out,
> it was b/c sshd refused the connection due to a missing /run/sshd directory.
>
> the logfile entry:
> Aug 28 00:10:08 mail sshd[151893]: fatal: Missing privileg
o i
copied /usr/lib/systemd/system/ssh@.service to /etc/systemd/system/ and
changed 'RuntimeDirectory=sshd' to 'RuntimeDirectory=sshd.%i', and it
works.
is it safe to say, that this issue is a misconfiguration? should the
package maintainer be notified? or did i miss something?
greetings...
Lisi gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Tuesday 31 January 2012 07:50:48 Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> > I really prefer using Gmane to getting all those raw E-mail messages. There
> > is far too much traffic on that list of yours.
>
> A valid decision. But at that rate it is not much use complaining to the
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 22:20:27 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mi, 01 feb 12, 06:55:44, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > On 01/02/12 04:58, Lisi wrote:
> > > On Monday 30 January 2012 11:44:04 Andreas Gläser wrote:
> > >> News reached me already, that all user 'must' upgrade from 3.1. to
> > >> 3.2., as t
Leaving aside usability-questions for now and trying to continue making friends
with Gmane:
> Kind of redundant now that you've used aptitude to upgrade - if you
> hadn't I'd have then asked for the output of "apt-get -s upgrade".
> In this case it looks I'd ask for the output of:-
> # apt-get -s
On Mi, 01 feb 12, 06:55:44, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 01/02/12 04:58, Lisi wrote:
> > On Monday 30 January 2012 11:44:04 Andreas Gläser wrote:
> >> News reached me already, that all user 'must' upgrade from 3.1. to 3.2., as
> >> this is going the new Ubuntu-longterm-supported kernel.
> >> So I sup
On 01/02/12 04:58, Lisi wrote:
> On Monday 30 January 2012 11:44:04 Andreas Gläser wrote:
>> News reached me already, that all user 'must' upgrade from 3.1. to 3.2., as
>> this is going the new Ubuntu-longterm-supported kernel.
>> So I suppose, Squeeze is oing to come with a 3.2.x kernel, too.
>
>
On 01/02/12 01:30, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Ma, 31 ian 12, 20:54:48, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>
>>> root@osrdii:/home/andreas# cat /etc/apt/preferences Package: * Pin:
>>> release a=squeeze-backports Pin-Priority: 200
>>>
>>> Package: * Pin: release o=Debian,a=stable,n=squeeze,l=Debian
>>> Pin-Pri
On Monday 30 January 2012 11:44:04 Andreas Gläser wrote:
> News reached me already, that all user 'must' upgrade from 3.1. to 3.2., as
> this is going the new Ubuntu-longterm-supported kernel.
> So I suppose, Squeeze is oing to come with a 3.2.x kernel, too.
???
Sorry, I can't follow this at all.
On Ma, 31 ian 12, 20:54:48, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
> > root@osrdii:/home/andreas# cat /etc/apt/preferences Package: * Pin:
> > release a=squeeze-backports Pin-Priority: 200
> >
> > Package: * Pin: release o=Debian,a=stable,n=squeeze,l=Debian
> > Pin-Priority: 700
> >
> > Package: * Pin: releas
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 07:50:48 Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> I really prefer using Gmane to getting all those raw E-mail messages. There
> is far too much traffic on that list of yours.
A valid decision. But at that rate it is not much use complaining to the list
if you don't like what Gmane doe
On 31/01/12 18:50, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> root@osrdii:/home/andreas# aptitude upgrade Resolving dependencies...
> The following NEW packages will be installed: libavcodec53{a}
> libavformat53{a} libavutil-extra-51{a} libpostproc-extra-52{a}
> libswscale-extra-2{a} libx264-116{a} The following p
root@osrdii:/home/andreas# aptitude upgrade
Resolving dependencies...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libavcodec53{a} libavformat53{a} libavutil-extra-51{a} libpostproc-extra-52{a}
libswscale-extra-2{a} libx264-116{a} The following packages will be REMOVED:
libarts
>
> Backports has 3.2, which according to
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/01/msg00012.html is
> going to be the next stable kernel ;)
>
> First I would suggest you install 3.2 from backports, reboot to use it
> and then remove any trace of testing/wheezy from your system
On 31/01/12 02:34, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> First I had some problems with gmane finding the my thread, the I tried to
> reply through
> gmane, but now I found that my answer was not there, although the system told
> me, that
> sending seems to have been done correctly.
> When I think of it now t
First I had some problems with gmane finding the my thread, the I tried to
reply through
gmane, but now I found that my answer was not there, although the system told
me, that
sending seems to have been done correctly.
When I think of it now this must be the most insecure thing ever, as only my
[Please reply instead of writing new messages, it makes it easier to
follow]
On Lu, 30 ian 12, 07:14:19, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
[...]
You don't have lenny-backports in your sources.list and the
corresponding pin is not needed anymore (not even for
squeeze-backports), please remove it.
> The
> Please post the output of 'apt-cache policy'.
>
andreas@osrdii:~$ apt-cache policy
Package files:
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
release a=now
100 http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/ squeeze-backports/main amd64
Packages
release o=Debian Backports,a=squeeze-backports,n=squeeze-
On Du, 29 ian 12, 18:24:56, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> andreas@osrdii:~$ sudo aptitude dist-upgrade
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> libtirpc1{a} rpcbind{ab}
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> nfs-common xserver-xephyr{b} xserver-xorg-core{b}
> 3 packages upgraded, 2
andreas@osrdii:~$ sudo aptitude update
.
.
.
Fetched 4,906 kB in 14s (339
kB/s)
Current status: 4 updates [+1], 9821 new [+12].
andreas@osrdii:~$ sudo aptitude upgrade
Resolving dependencies...
The following packages will be upgraded:
libicu44
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly instal
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tapas Mishra
Date: Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM
Subject: some misconfiguration in making a reverse proxy not clear
what went wrong
To: debian-us...@lists.debian.org
I want to host sites.
http://www.myserver.com
http://site1.myserver.com
I have a
In <4a4e39d8.1c05d00a.378f.e...@mx.google.com>, Sthu Deus wrote:
>Thank You very much for Your time and answer, Boyd:
>> Can your kernel flash your BIOS? In theory it could hide there and in
>> whatever NVRAM your system has.
>
>I use common kernels from common repos. Can they?
I believe they
Thank You very much for Your time and answer, Boyd:
> Can your kernel flash your BIOS? In theory it could hide there and in
> whatever NVRAM your system has.
I use common kernels from common repos. Can they?
> When you "reformat" do you simply repartition and recreate filesystems,
> leaving y
In <4a43cd93.1c07d00a.02ca.3...@mx.google.com>, Sthu Deus wrote:
>Thank You for Your time and answer, Todd:
>> You can probably screw up any service if you try hard enough. Postfix is
>> relatively secure, at least when compared to sendmail. As root, though,
>> you're responsible for the security o
Thank You for Your time and answer, Todd:
> You can probably screw up any service if you try hard enough. Postfix is
> relatively secure, at least when compared to sendmail. As root, though,
> you're responsible for the security of your configurations if you
> deviate from the defaults.
Well. I d
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:33:17AM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Is there a possible misconfiguration on postfix that can lead to an OS
> breakage up to root privileges?
You can probably screw up any service if you try hard enough. Postfix is
relatively secure, at least when compared to sendma
Sthu Deus wrote:
Good day.
Is there a possible misconfiguration on postfix that can lead to an OS breakage
up to root privileges?
Thank You for Your time.
Less likely, I'd say...what exactly is your problem?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Good day.
Is there a possible misconfiguration on postfix that can lead to an OS breakage
up to root privileges?
Thank You for Your time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am currently using exim on my laptop for local delivery and sending
>> > mails. I'm also using fetchmail and procmail.
>> > After the we, when I connect to the internet, the system retrieves many
>> > mai
Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently using exim on my laptop for local delivery and sending
> mails. I'm also using fetchmail and procmail.
> After the we, when I connect to the internet, the system retrieves many
> mails, and exim is launched thousand times.
> So that more t
Hi,
I am currently using exim on my laptop for local delivery and sending
mails. I'm also using fetchmail and procmail.
After the we, when I connect to the internet, the system retrieves many
mails, and exim is launched thousand times.
So that more than 1500 process ( 2/3 exim and 1/3 procmail) a
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:25:14PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> but
> unlike GNU/Linux support, Fujitsu Support doesn't function on Sundays.
> It's wait and see...
Amazing, isn't it? So much for superior commercial support.
(Yeah yeah, I know it's not fair to compare hardware support to OS
> it is a good idea to visit the manufacturers' site. download an utility
> and test the drive for errors. seagate and western digital have pretty
> good utilities that run off a floppy after you boot using a dos bootdisk.
Thanks for all the replies, I've downloaded a drive testing program from
Fu
er Merwe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: hard drive problems... misconfiguration?
> I am getting the same kind of errors shown below from your email (see mail
> with subject "deselect and hda: irq timeout" 10-9 ... 10-10).
&g
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 04:09:11PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This isn't exactly Debian specific, but maybe someone here knows what
> the problem is ... ?
>
> I have an old P120 laptop with a 1Gig drive. This drive is acting up
> quite a lot lately. At the bottom of the email i
ED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 10:09 AM
Subject: hard drive problems... misconfiguration?
I.e. if lilo has no problems
with it I can have lba32 in there anyway?) I also have "compact" in my
lilo.conf, so that it boots a little faster. Is this hardware failure,
or misconfiguration?
Thanks,
Hugo van der Merwe
hda: read_intr: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Erro
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> Sebastiaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I accidentally misconfigured the package 'snort', so dpkg is unable to
> >finish the installation process. I am unable to run dpkg-reconfigure,
> >because the package is not fully installed. I am also unable to ru
Sebastiaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I accidentally misconfigured the package 'snort', so dpkg is unable to
>finish the installation process. I am unable to run dpkg-reconfigure,
>because the package is not fully installed. I am also unable to run
>dpkg-preconfigure, but that has no effect becaus
Hello,
I accidentally misconfigured the package 'snort', so dpkg is unable to
finish the installation process. I am unable to run dpkg-reconfigure,
because the package is not fully installed. I am also unable to run
dpkg-preconfigure, but that has no effect because the package already has
been con
47 matches
Mail list logo
