On, Sun, 9 Jul 2017 14:12:07 -0400, I wrote:
>> I run Wheezy with fvwm (window manager). I prefer to use the command line
>> when possible, and for mail I have bsd-mailx with sendmail. To read e-mails
>> sent as HTML or base64, I use metamail (which was last distributed wit
On 2017-07-09 at 14:12 -0400, Steve Kleene wrote:
> I run Wheezy with fvwm (window manager). I prefer to use the command line
> when possible, and for mail I have bsd-mailx with sendmail. To read e-mails
> sent as HTML or base64, I use metamail (which was last distributed with Etch,
On Sun 09 Jul 2017 at 14:12:07 (-0400), Steve Kleene wrote:
> I run Wheezy with fvwm (window manager). I prefer to use the command line
> when possible, and for mail I have bsd-mailx with sendmail. To read e-mails
> sent as HTML or base64, I use metamail (which was last distributed
I run Wheezy with fvwm (window manager). I prefer to use the command line
when possible, and for mail I have bsd-mailx with sendmail. To read e-mails
sent as HTML or base64, I use metamail (which was last distributed with Etch,
I think), as follows:
1. I save the e-mail to a file "mai
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Francesco Ariis wrote:
Searching in packages [1] for metamail leads me to a list of news, the first one
(in reverse chronological order) telling me that it has been removed from
testing
because not in unstable (Hint: Package not in unstable), the second one [2] with
the
ell me why it was removed.
>
Searching in packages [1] for metamail leads me to a list of news, the first one
(in reverse chronological order) telling me that it has been removed from
testing
because not in unstable (Hint: Package not in unstable), the second one [2] with
the reason you w
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/ is a very useful source of
information ;)
Thanks for this usefull link, but in that case, it just says:
This package is not part of any Debian distribution. Thus you won't
find much information here
According the
On Jo, 03 apr 14, 10:58:22, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> I recently discovered that the metamail package has beem removed from
> Debian distributions (I don't know when, but it seems that this removal
> is rather old)
> Do anybody know the reason of this removal?
> I cou
hi,
I recently discovered that the metamail package has beem removed from
Debian distributions (I don't know when, but it seems that this removal
is rather old)
Do anybody know the reason of this removal?
I could re-install it from a RedHat rpm, and up to now, it works perfectly.
best re
;s name to another
file.
I've been playing with metamail for saving the pieces but I can't figure
out how to save all the parts but I can't figure out how to make it not
require user input.
So far I can get the files saved to the current directory with the
filenames encoded in the m
On Sunday 16 September 2001 11:51 am, Bud Rogers wrote:
> metamail for MIME attachments
Ack. That was not intended for the list. That red glow on the horizon is my
face...
--
Bud Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
They have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve.
metamail for MIME attachments
--
Bud Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
They have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve.
Hi debian users!
I tried to install mime-compose.el to enhance Emacs20 in Slink, but in the
comments it stated that it required mmencode and that mmencode is included in
the metamail distribution. I did a "whereis mmencode" but it did not seem to be
installed on my system. I do hav
Odds are no-one on the list will have the same setup, but here
goes...
Before my upgrade to link, I used mhn as a mail back-end and mh-e as
it's front-end. After installing metamail, whenever I did
`M-! mhn' on a message, the appropriate /etc/mailcap entry will
executed to
there will be no problem with pgp
metamail now decodes them bach to spaces:
> 3 space:
> 2 tab :
>:bat 2
>:ecaps 3
now checking the signature will fail.
Is there a way to avoid this?
Greetings
--
Alexander N. Benner - The Seven Promises of a Promise Keep
.1 (slink), all my M-x metamail-interpret-body
commands
give me a viewer
(xterm) that allow me to read a message once. Then it is gone.
Is there a _clean_ way in modern Debian that will allow me to read/process MIME
and
quoted-printable
messages withing RMAIL? It is quite frustrating that Ema
On Tue, 29 Dec 1998, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> I'd like metamail to offer me _all_ of the possible display
> machanisms until I say yes to one of them:
>
> In my ~/.mailcap I have:
>
> application/msword; /opt/WordPerfect8/wpbin/xwp %s
> application/ms
I'd like metamail to offer me _all_ of the possible display
machanisms until I say yes to one of them:
In my ~/.mailcap I have:
application/msword; /opt/WordPerfect8/wpbin/xwp %s
application/msword; /opt/StarOffice-5.0/bin/soffice %s
application/msword; word2txt %s
When I view it
I really do not like how METAMAIL deals
with DIGESTS (=multipart/digest or something like
taht)
Is there a way to use another program?
It would be very useful to have a list of the parts
presented, from wich to choose the single message,
isn't it?
Hope somebody has help on this...
Thanks,
E
> > Hi,
> > I am expiriencing problems with metamail after a recent upgrade to
> > metamail 2.7-20. Whenever it is invoked, I get the following error:
> >
Upgrade to metamail 2.7-21. Then it works fine again.
Chiel
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail t
> metamail uses /lib/ld-linux.so.2 but should /lib/ld-linux.so.1.
> I submitted this question as Bug#9391 to debian-bugs.
>
I maked a link:
cd /lib; ln -s ld-linux.so.1 ld-linux.so.2
and got metamail to run but this may produce other problems.
Mirek
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAI
> Hi,
> I am expiriencing problems with metamail after a recent upgrade to
> metamail 2.7-20. Whenever it is invoked, I get the following error:
>
> bash: /usr/bin/metamail: No such file or directory
> $ dpkg -l metamail
>
> ii metamail2.7-20 A
Hi,
I am expiriencing problems with metamail after a recent upgrade to
metamail 2.7-20. Whenever it is invoked, I get the following error:
bash: /usr/bin/metamail: No such file or directory
$ dpkg -l metamail
ii metamail2.7-20 An implementation of MIME.
$ ls -l /usr/bin
I installed the metamail package and followed the directions in
/usr/doc/metamail/mailers.txt.gz to make my emacs (rmail) mime aware.
It seems to work, though I haven't looked at many types of files.
The only correction I wanted to make is that we don't have to have
"transparent
24 matches
Mail list logo
