On 9/24/17, Gary Roach wrote:
> On 09/19/2017 11:57 AM, Gary Roach wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> While this may seem to be a bit off topic, I feel that I may get answers
>> faster here than any where else. This problem applies to Debian, Ubuntu
>> and, to some extent, Mac OS.
>>
>> I have spent the last mo
On 09/19/2017 11:57 AM, Gary Roach wrote:
Hi all,
While this may seem to be a bit off topic, I feel that I may get answers
faster here than any where else. This problem applies to Debian, Ubuntu
and, to some extent, Mac OS.
I have spent the last month and a half ( or longer) trying to compile
an
Gary Roach writes:
> Hi all,
> While this may seem to be a bit off topic, I feel that I may get
> answers faster here than any where else. This problem applies to
> Debian, Ubuntu and, to some extent, Mac OS.
>
> I have spent the last month and a half ( or longer) trying to compile
> and link a p
On 19/09/17 13:57, Gary Roach wrote:
> What I need is a cross reference between Mumps, MPI, OpenMP and FETI4I
> and the library names in the Debian and Ubuntu repositories.
OpenMP is not a library. It is an extension of C to allow convenient
parallel programming. It is enabled in GCC with “-fopenm
Hi,
Gary Roach wrote:
> Elmer requires the following libraries: Mumps, MPI, OpenMP, FETI4I
Mumps ? Is there a use case for swollen cheeks ?
> The problem is that none if the four libraries go
> under the names mentioned above.
If i know the name of files which are missing, e.g. from an exam
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:57:54AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> Hi all,
> While this may seem to be a bit off topic, I feel that I may get answers
> faster here than any where else. This problem applies to Debian, Ubuntu and,
> to some extent, Mac OS.
>
> I have spent the last month and a half ( or
Hi all,
While this may seem to be a bit off topic, I feel that I may get answers
faster here than any where else. This problem applies to Debian, Ubuntu
and, to some extent, Mac OS.
I have spent the last month and a half ( or longer) trying to compile
and link a program called Elmer FEM. The
On 2014-10-19 17:39 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> I hve dependencies which grap libjpeg-turbo-progs and libjpeg-progs
> which claim ownership of the same file.
>
> There are already bugs about this (764318, 764322,765667,765790) but I
> do not understand what I should do about this
Probably install
Erwan David wrote:
Hello,
I hve dependencies which grap libjpeg-turbo-progs and libjpeg-progs
which claim ownership of the same file.
There are already bugs about this (764318, 764322,765667,765790) but I
do not understand what I should do about this
So, do someone have a hint ?
I had the s
Hello,
I hve dependencies which grap libjpeg-turbo-progs and libjpeg-progs
which claim ownership of the same file.
There are already bugs about this (764318, 764322,765667,765790) but I
do not understand what I should do about this
So, do someone have a hint ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Hi Paul,
Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have been cleaning up old email files and in the process created a
> mess I have several mail directories containing emails from different
> times and collected under slightly different operating condition. I
> want to merge them into a single direct
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:36:01 -0600
Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have been cleaning up old email files and in the process created a
> mess I have several mail directories containing emails from different
> times and collected under slightly different operating condition. I
> want to merge
I have been cleaning up old email files and in the process created a
mess I have several mail directories containing emails from different
times and collected under slightly different operating condition. I
want to merge them into a single directory with the emails arranged in
threads by topic and
On 08/07/14 14:17, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Anyone use MESS and have it working? :
$ /usr/games/mess c64n -sc|egrep -i path
# CORE SEARCH PATH OPTIONS
rompath /tmp/bios
$ ls -l /tmp/bios/901226-01.u3
-rw--- 1 me me 8192 Dec 24 1996 /tmp/bios/901226-01.u3
$ /usr/games/mess
Anyone use MESS and have it working? :
$ /usr/games/mess c64n -sc|egrep -i path
# CORE SEARCH PATH OPTIONS
rompath /tmp/bios
$ ls -l /tmp/bios/901226-01.u3
-rw--- 1 me me 8192 Dec 24 1996 /tmp/bios/901226-01.u3
$ /usr/games/mess c64n
901226-01.u3 NOT FOUND
... (more
Ahoj,
Dňa Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:18:21 +0300 Andrei POPESCU
napísal:
> > >reduce the size of your /var/lib/dpkg/available. HOW ? well just
> > >open the file and delete stuff and save ! ok. there are too many
> > >ways to choose how. back up before doing it. and don't delete any
> > >you'll n
[I hope I got the attributions correctly, as far as I can tell I'm only
responding to "John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell", not to
berenger.morel@, from what appears to have been a private reply]
> Le 11.06.2014 08:41, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell a écrit :
> >
> >NO. APT does not bre
Le 11.06.2014 08:41, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell a écrit :
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 08.06.2014 17:10, The Wanderer a écrit :
Maybe it's possible to configure aptitude so that it doesn't do
that...
but if so, I would think that configuration should be the default,
bec
Le 08.06.2014 17:10, The Wanderer a écrit :
Maybe it's possible to configure aptitude so that it doesn't do
that...
but if so, I would think that configuration should be the default,
because as things stand it seems almost worse than useless for
anything
but the simplest operations.
Can't
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:40:37 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 11:10:02PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 June 2014 21:41:17 Slavko wrote:
> > > apt-get is quicker than aptitude and has (by the release note)
> >
> > The release notes have not been consistent abou
On Lu, 09 iun 14, 14:55:26, Dalios wrote:
>
> Never tried apt before so after your message I decided to research a little.
> Searching for info on apt is quite tricky as the web is full of pages on
> apt-get and aptitude etc. Searching for "apt vs apt-get" returned this
> reddit thread which is ju
On Monday 09 June 2014 14:40:37 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > The release notes have not been consistent about which they recommend for
> > a particular upgrade. Both have been recommended on occasion.
>
> For the same release?
Of course not.
> The release notes are written for *each* release,
>
On Lu, 09 iun 14, 13:19:33, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
> I also have played with pinning in the past. I must admit, I agree with you,
> it not a very good solution, since you need to progressively add every
> dependency of the tool you want to upgrade, or automatical upgrades will
> fa
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 11:10:02PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 07 June 2014 21:41:17 Slavko wrote:
> > apt-get is quicker than aptitude and has (by the release note)
>
> The release notes have not been consistent about which they recommend for a
> particular upgrade. Both have been re
On 06/09/2014 11:45 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 09 iun 14, 08:35:44, Dalios wrote:
# apt-get clean && apt-get autoclean && apt-get autoremove && apt-get update
&& apt-get upgrade && apt-get dist-upgrade
A few comments:
- autoclean after clean is redundant
- I don't think clearing your ca
cache from another
computer which runs testing/unstable/experimental... see the mess? :) ).
Now, things are clean and stable. If I had to achieve the same through
pure command-line, I would not have made it, probably I would have
reinstalled. Using a minimal system probably helped, as well as
Le 07.06.2014 11:58, Slavko a écrit :
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 7 Jun 2014 09:48:44 +0200 Thierry de Coulon
napísal:
Hello all,
I've lived for years using synaptic and I am no so used to aptitude
-
and I don't want to make mistakes...
Possibly my installation is now in such a state that I should
r
On Lu, 09 iun 14, 08:35:44, Dalios wrote:
>
> # apt-get clean && apt-get autoclean && apt-get autoremove && apt-get update
> && apt-get upgrade && apt-get dist-upgrade
A few comments:
- autoclean after clean is redundant
- I don't think clearing your cache *before* the upgrade is such a good
i
08.06.2014, 15:10, "Gour" :
> David Dušanić writes:
>> I think you can also use aptitude on sid but I really prefer apt.
>
> So, you believe aptitude is no better than apt in resolve package deps
> (in Sid) ?
It is my personal preference. I never understood aptitude good enough to use it
so I
On 06/08/2014 06:10 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
Likewise FWIW, I invariably use apt-get, because aptitude routinely
recommends dependency-resolution "solutions" which involve not doing
anything like what I requested - and indeed often involve removing the
very package I requested to be installed - wh
Slavko:
>
> Sure, here is today example (it comes from my Raspbian with recompiled
> packages from sid in my own repo):
>
> LANG=C apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 13:33:28 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 08 June 2014 12:55:26 Slavko wrote:
> > Migration from apt-get/aptitude to Synaptic must be safe. The
> > problem in opposite direction, i.e. from Synaptic to
> > apt-get/aptitude, where Synaptic lack some functionality about the
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/08/2014 11:03 AM, Stephen Allen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 09:57:39PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>> Thierry de Coulon:
>>>
>>> I've lived for years using synaptic and I am no so used to
>>> aptitude - and I don't want to make mista
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 09:57:39PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Thierry de Coulon:
> >
> > I've lived for years using synaptic and I am no so used to aptitude - and I
> > don't want to make mistakes...
>
> In addition to the good advice regarding automatically installed
> packages that has alr
On Du, 08 iun 14, 14:19:26, David Dušanić wrote:
>
> I think running sid is just a matter of how good you can "drive" the
> Debian package manager, be it aptitude or apt.
That's a fairly good description in my opinion :)
> But I would never use something graphical (synaptic) to make my
> upgra
On Du, 08 iun 14, 15:07:31, Gour wrote:
> David Dušanić writes:
>
> > I think you can also use aptitude on sid but I really prefer apt.
>
> So, you believe aptitude is no better than apt in resolve package deps
> (in Sid) ?
aptitude and apt have different resolvers. At some point in time
apti
On Du, 08 iun 14, 15:00:58, Gour wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU writes:
>
> > Especially on sid aptitude (in interactive mode) can be very useful, but
> > beware of #570377.
>
> Hmm..
I'm right now testing this in apt.conf
// tweak Aptitude to not suggest removals as first option
Aptitude::ProblemRe
"D.E. Bil" writes:
> And more human-readable logs in /var/log/aptitude.
That's a good point. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.de
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 15:04:17 +0200
Gour wrote:
> I do not mind the interface, just wondering which is more suitable
> for Sid considering that the dynamic of admin work is a bit
> different than when one uses stable distro?
I use synaptic and sometimes dselect (much more on stable).
Synaptic ma
David Dušanić writes:
> I think you can also use aptitude on sid but I really prefer apt.
So, you believe aptitude is no better than apt in resolve package deps
(in Sid) ?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
In this endeavor there is no loss or diminution,
and a little advancement on this path can protect
Slavko writes:
> You can simply ignore the sid word in my post.
Ahh, OK. Good to know. ;)
> Using Synaptic seems to be safe (in mean of the original problem in this
> thread).
Maybe I shoud read the whole thread...
> AFAIK, the functionality of the apt-get and aptitude is compatible in
> thes
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> Especially on sid aptitude (in interactive mode) can be very useful, but
> beware of #570377.
Hmm..
> There is no procedure, just use which one you like/need/etc.
Iirc, one has to be careful when migrating from one tool to the other in
order not to end up with many un
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:55:26PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> AFAIK, the functionality of the apt-get and aptitude is compatible in
> these days, with only one difference - the ncurses interface in
> aptitude.
And more human-readable logs in /var/log/aptitude.
--
debil
:wq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Sunday 08 June 2014 12:55:26 Slavko wrote:
> Migration from apt-get/aptitude to Synaptic must be safe. The problem
> in opposite direction, i.e. from Synaptic to apt-get/aptitude, where
> Synaptic lack some functionality about the marking/removing
> the automatically installed packages.
I have
08.06.2014, 12:27, "Gour" :
>
> I must say that I'm still quite noobie when it comes to package
> management on Debian mostly using apt-get/synaptic and I
> read/heard somewhere that for Sid those are recommended over aptitude?
>
> Do I miss something and/or what would be recommended procedure for
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 08 Jun 2014 12:27:04 +0200 Gour napísal:
> Slavko writes:
>
> > Then i run aptitude and after some keypress is see, that there is
> > one conflict with some co-package (cgi plugin) from old uwsgi
> > version.
>
> I must say that I'm still quite noobie when it comes to package
>
se part of Gnome is missing, it should clean up and remove
> anything that needs it (the list of removal is long, but does include
> gftp and so).
Yep.
> Whats more, the system seems not logical, as it wants to remove Gimp
> but complains that gimp-data (not to be removed) needs Gim
On Du, 08 iun 14, 12:27:04, Gour wrote:
> Slavko writes:
>
> > Then i run aptitude and after some keypress is see, that there is one
> > conflict with some co-package (cgi plugin) from old uwsgi version.
>
> I must say that I'm still quite noobie when it comes to package
> management on Debian m
Slavko writes:
> Then i run aptitude and after some keypress is see, that there is one
> conflict with some co-package (cgi plugin) from old uwsgi version.
I must say that I'm still quite noobie when it comes to package
management on Debian mostly using apt-get/synaptic and I
read/heard somewher
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 7 Jun 2014 23:10:02 +0100 Lisi Reisz
napísal:
> I prefer aptitude because I know what I am doing with it (sort of)
> and because I don't have such a plethora of commands: apt-get,
> apt-cache, apt-file etc. to remember. But I use apt-x on occasion
> since it is no longer recommen
Thierry de Coulon writes:
Hello Thierry.
> This being said, "pure" wheezy simply can't work on my machine (no graphics,
> no network, not even a hard disc...) so the only other choice is another
> distribution until Jessie becomes stable.
>
> I can't stand Ubuntu(s), but openSuSE ssems OK (eve
On Sunday 08 June 2014 00.10:02 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 07 June 2014 21:41:17 Slavko wrote:
> > apt-get is quicker than aptitude and has (by the release note)
>
> The release notes have not been consistent about which they recommend for a
> particular upgrade. Both have been recommended on
On Saturday 07 June 2014 21:41:17 Slavko wrote:
> apt-get is quicker than aptitude and has (by the release note)
The release notes have not been consistent about which they recommend for a
particular upgrade. Both have been recommended on occasion.
I prefer aptitude because I know what I am d
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 7 Jun 2014 21:57:39 +0200 Jochen Spieker
napísal:
> Thierry de Coulon:
> >
> > I've lived for years using synaptic and I am no so used to aptitude
> > - and I don't want to make mistakes...
>
> In addition to the good advice regarding automatically installed
> packages that has
Thierry de Coulon:
>
> I've lived for years using synaptic and I am no so used to aptitude - and I
> don't want to make mistakes...
In addition to the good advice regarding automatically installed
packages that has already been given I have one question: why do you
want to use aptitude? I used a
A step before that maybe, to take further what Slavko proposed, to sort out
packages which are dependencies or recommendations of other packages which are
not marked "automatically installed". The aptitude command-line search can help
here:
$ aptitude search '~i!~M(~R~i|~Rrecommends:~i)'
will sho
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 7 Jun 2014 12:22:04 +0200 Thierry de Coulon
napísal:
> Thanks Slavko. I'm not sure I got everything, but it shows the way to
> go: learn using aptitude.
Don't worry. If you uninstall something, you can always install it
back (remember the "+" key?) :)
Aptitude is simple and stra
On Saturday 07 June 2014 11.58:41 Slavko wrote:
> Ahoj,
>
(...)
>
> You need to learn one thing - the "A" mark in the aptitude, eg (rest
> of lines removed):
>
> ilibpam0g-dev
> i A libpam0g
> ^^^
(...)
>
> Hope this help you.
Thanks Slavko. I'm not sure I got everything, but it shows the w
ther DE, then removed *parts* of gnome, and the system is
> thinking because part of Gnome is missing, it should clean up and remove
> anything that needs it (the list of removal is long, but does include gftp
> and so). Whats more, the system seems not logical, as it wants to remove Gimp
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 7 Jun 2014 09:48:44 +0200 Thierry de Coulon
napísal:
> Hello all,
>
> I've lived for years using synaptic and I am no so used to aptitude -
> and I don't want to make mistakes...
>
> Possibly my installation is now in such a state that I should
> reinstall, but everything *is* w
ts to remove Gimp but complains that gimp-data (not
> to be removed) needs Gimp
>
> Any way to bring this mess in order?
>
I'd try aptitude full-upgrade first. That will give you a list of
proposals. If you don't like them, say no, and like Groucho Marx, it
will give y
g that needs it (the list of removal is long, but does include gftp
and so). Whats more, the system seems not logical, as it wants to remove Gimp
but complains that gimp-data (not to be removed) needs Gimp
Any way to bring this mess in order?
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:04:49PM +0100, lee wrote:
> Yeah and that's why you are forced to turn your system into a mess with
> brokenarch and are supposed to try packages from unstable which create
> only more dependency problems and mess things up even further.
>
> Think i
On 27.04.2012 18:59, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:39:07 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>
>> On 27.04.2012 17:05, Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
According to "dispmua" (package: xul-ext-dispmua),
>>>
>>> I didn't know about such a package existed (he, he... I wonder what
>>> icon di
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:39:07 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> On 27.04.2012 17:05, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> According to "dispmua" (package: xul-ext-dispmua),
>>
>> I didn't know about such a package existed (he, he... I wonder what
>> icon displays with my posts ;-P)
>
> It looks like news p
On 27.04.2012 17:05, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:40:32 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>
>> On 25.04.2012 20:34, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:25:19 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
>>>
I'm not sure where the problem lies, but all of the mail I am
receiving from this mai
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:40:32 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> On 25.04.2012 20:34, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:25:19 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure where the problem lies, but all of the mail I am
>>> receiving from this mailing list is coming in as attachments to
>>>
Sorry about the Iceweasel. Yes I meant Icedove. I was mucking around
with the settings and ran across "Display Attachments Inline" under the
View menu. I checked it and the problem went away. I'm not sure why this
should make such a difference but it does. The package now works as it
should. T
On 25.04.2012 20:34, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:25:19 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure where the problem lies, but all of the mail I am receiving
>> from this mailing list is coming in as attachments to attachments to a
>> blank email. This mailing list is different than th
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:25:19 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> I'm not sure where the problem lies, but all of the mail I am receiving
> from this mailing list is coming in as attachments to attachments to a
> blank email. This mailing list is different than the others to which I
> subcribe in that after
ignature valid or not instead of signature.asc attachments
or "long mess" in the end of emails.
--
Mika Suomalainen
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728
Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
0x82A46728.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I'm not sure where the problem lies, but all of the mail I am receiving
from this mailing list is coming in as attachments to attachments to a
blank email. This mailing list is different than the others to which I
subcribe in that after the index all of the messages are attachments.
All my othe
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 06:10:00 +0100
"Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Scott Ferguson [mailto:prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Sa 12/3/2011 01:26
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Assistance re
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ferguson [mailto:prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sa 12/3/2011 01:26
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: Assistance required ,alsa audio mess since last updates from Sid
On 02/12/11 23:24, Richard wrote:
> Hi
> This
W
On 02/12/11 23:24, Richard wrote:
> Hi
> This
What is "this"?
> was working until, I think, the last batch of updates from sid
> If you look at the audio device list below, the wanted device is hw:0,0
> which is working on other applications:-
>
> Audio InputOutput Device Name
> Devi
Hi
This was working until, I think, the last batch of updates from sid
If you look at the audio device list below, the wanted device is hw:0,0
which is working on other applications:-
Audio InputOutput Device Name
Device Channels Channels
-
in the recommendations that you pick a different one. It is
>> > notoriously the most difficult to configure.
>>
>> The thread has taken a turn away from what OP was about. It wasn't
>> technical help with sendmail itself, but more cleaning up a mess of my
>>
ne. It is
> > notoriously the most difficult to configure.
>
> The thread has taken a turn away from what OP was about. It wasn't
> technical help with sendmail itself, but more cleaning up a mess of my
> own making concerning the installing of the sendmail pkgs.
>
Th
has taken a turn away from what OP was about. It wasn't
technical help with sendmail itself, but more cleaning up a mess of my
own making concerning the installing of the sendmail pkgs.
I did bang my head a bit on the authentication but finally realized I
was using credentials from a closed ac
Darac Marjal writes:
>> Do you know of a case where postfix was made to use Smarthost
>> smtp.comcast.net? I'd probably drop sendmail after years of use in
>> favor of postfix, but the several times I tried to configure it for
>> comcasts authentication, I failed miserably.
>>
>> I am probably
are all debian tools.
> - - --=-- - ---
> -
> Due to unbridled personal bungling, I've created a nasty mess while
> installing sendmail.
>
> I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail. Well I thought I'd just
> reinstall se
On 28/09/11 11:39, Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:24:22AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail. Well I thought I'd just
reinstall sendmail to re-acquire that file.
...
Any attempt to uninstall it tells me it is not installed, any attempt
to i
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 09:28:29AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Carl Fink writes:
>
> > However my preferred method:
> >
> > "sudo aptitude install postfix"
> >
> > Postfix is a drop-in replacement for sendmail that can be configured by mere
> > mortals.
>
> Do you know of a case where postfix w
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:24:22 -0500
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Due to unbridled personal bungling, I've created a nasty mess while
> installing sendmail.
>
I've never been near sendmail, so I can't help directly with the
problem.
I've seen the other replies, and:
1)
Darac Marjal writes:
>> So, can anyone recommend some method to get past this, and get the
>> pkgs fully installed and configured?
>>
>
> I imagine that, while configuring sendmail, dpkg tries to stop the
> sendmail process by invoking the init script. The init script isn't
> there, so it thinks
Carl Fink writes:
> However my preferred method:
>
> "sudo aptitude install postfix"
>
> Postfix is a drop-in replacement for sendmail that can be configured by mere
> mortals.
Do you know of a case where postfix was made to use Smarthost
smtp.comcast.net? I'd probably drop sendmail after year
On 09/28/2011 01:39 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
However my preferred method:
"sudo aptitude install postfix"
Best: "sudo apt-get install exim4"
;-)
--
RMA.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
e to unbridled personal bungling, I've created a nasty mess while
> installing sendmail.
>
>
> So, can anyone recommend some method to get past this, and get the
> pkgs fully installed and configured?
Please seriously consider using a different mail server package. Choose
among
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:24:22AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail. Well I thought I'd just
> reinstall sendmail to re-acquire that file.
...
> Any attempt to uninstall it tells me it is not installed, any attempt
> to install it ends with an error tha
l debian tools.
> - - --=-- - --- -
>
> Due to unbridled personal bungling, I've created a nasty mess while
> installing sendmail.
>
> I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail. Well I thought I'd just
> reinstall sendmail to re-acquire that file.
>
gling, I've created a nasty mess while
installing sendmail.
I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail. Well I thought I'd just
reinstall sendmail to re-acquire that file.
So uninstalled sendmail... with aptitude but it uninstalled a few
other parts of the tools too.
There appea
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 05:10:40PM -0500, Charles Blair wrote:
> ** THE MESS *
>
>I recently tried to set up a multi-boot with windows 7
> and squeeze on a laptop. When started, grub displays
>
>/dev/sda1 Windows 7
>/dev/sda2 also Windows 7
>
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Charles Blair wrote:
> ** THE MESS *
>
> I recently tried to set up a multi-boot with windows 7
> and squeeze on a laptop. When started, grub displays
>
> /dev/sda1 Windows 7
> /dev/sda2 also Windows 7
> /dev/sda3 Win
On 05/28/2011 05:10 PM, Charles Blair wrote:
[snip]
We can only pray that you have...
--
"Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure
the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally
corrupt."
Samuel Adams, essay in The Public Advertiser, 1749
--
To UNS
** THE MESS *
I recently tried to set up a multi-boot with windows 7
and squeeze on a laptop. When started, grub displays
/dev/sda1 Windows 7
/dev/sda2 also Windows 7
/dev/sda3 Windows 7 recovery
/dev/sda4 Debian
/dev/sda5 Debian recovery
I am relieved that
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:13:01 + (UTC), I wrote:
> I'm running testing (Wheezy) and am failing to get copy/paste working cleanly
> among my most common windows, namely:
>
> several xterms
> virtualbox running a virtual XP client
> iceweasel
> ...
> Is there any way to get all of these program
I'm running testing (Wheezy) and am failing to get copy/paste working cleanly
among my most common windows, namely:
several xterms
virtualbox running a virtual XP client
iceweasel
The window manager is fvwm. As far as I can tell, the problem comes down to
this:
virtualbox only reads from
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:51, Rob Owens wrote:
> Maybe you should be using LTSP. It will pxe boot pretty much anything,
> and then do a remote GUI session to your server -- sound included.
I don't want PXE, but rather two sessions (one local one remote), but
i'll look into it, thanks.
--
Mars
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:39:12PM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:38, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> >> Now it's pulseaudio, seems simple but i'm missing something (it's
> >> listening!).
> >
> > ..for XDMCP connections?
>
> Well yeah, XDMCP doesn't carry sound. My progress
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:38, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>> Now it's pulseaudio, seems simple but i'm missing something (it's
>> listening!).
>
> ..for XDMCP connections?
Well yeah, XDMCP doesn't carry sound. My progress so far has been
losing sound altogether, but got it back on. Both boxes have
p
1 - 100 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
