Hello,
I have recently dist-upgraded from potato to sid, and I have noticed
that update-menus does not generate all of the available menu entries.
There are many more menu entries in /usr/lib/menu[/default] that are not
present in the menus themselves.
For example, gnome-terminal provides
/usr/li
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 06:26:15AM -0700, Sean Champ wrote:
>
> if the debian 'menu' package [
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu.html/ ] does offer
> console-support , this email can probably be disregarded.
Well, i don't believe menu has a non-comman
On 30-Aug-2000 Sean Champ wrote:
> hi.
>
> if the debian 'menu' package [
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu.html/ ] does offer
> console-support , this email can probably be disregarded.
>
> ( having a need to stay booted to ms-w right now, i
hi.
if the debian 'menu' package [
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu.html/ ] does offer
console-support , this email can probably be disregarded.
( having a need to stay booted to ms-w right now, i can't check this myself,
yet. also, the following )
if it (
The Philadelphia Area Debian Society (PADS)
(http://www.CJFearnley.com/pads/)
presents
Debian's Menu Package: A Catalog of Debian Software
When:
Wednesday 15 Dec
> Hi,
>
> I just did an upgrade from menu version 1.3-2 to 1.4-1 and I noticed that
> the program "update-menus" provided by the new package segmentation faults
> when the pre-removal and post-removal scripts execute it. This effects
> packages such as procps and xproc. Anyone seen this? Thanks...
Hi,
I just did an upgrade from menu version 1.3-2 to 1.4-1 and I noticed that
the program "update-menus" provided by the new package segmentation faults
when the pre-removal and post-removal scripts execute it. This effects
packages such as procps and xproc. Anyone seen this? Thanks...
J. Goldman
7 matches
Mail list logo
