On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Bob Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:25:35 +0800, Star Liu (minxinjian...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Star Liu wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
>> >> At grub's menu, edit the kernel comm
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:25:35 +0800, Star Liu (minxinjian...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Star Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >> At grub's menu, edit the kernel command line so that you add:
> >>
> >> init=/bin/sh
gt; > fsck died with exit status 4
>>> > failed (code 4)
>>> > An automatic file system check(fsck) of the root filesystem failed. A
>>> > manual fsck must be performed. The
t; An automatic file system check(fsck) of the root filesystem failed. A
>> > manual fsck must be performed. The fsck should be performed in
>> > maintance mode with the root filesystem mounted in read-only mode.
>> > failed!
>> >
r message:
> > ---
> > /dev/sda4: unexpected inconsistency; run fsck manually.(i.e., without
> > -a or -p options)
> > fsck died with exit status 4
> > failed (code 4)
> > An automatic file system check(fsck) of the root filesystem failed. A
> > manual fsck
ally.(i.e., without
> -a or -p options)
> fsck died with exit status 4
> failed (code 4)
> An automatic file system check(fsck) of the root filesystem failed. A
> manual fsck must be performed. The fsck should be performed in
> maintance mode with the root filesystem mounted
* Frank Lanitz [2009-03-09 14:58:57 +0100]:
> But it's cool to see all the stuff comes in and help testing the packages.
We do. When I have time to play, I love to see what can be done with my
favorite stuff. My road lappy is running Lenny - and is quite happy
with it. I'll keep it there,
Dave Patterson escreveu:
> * Star Liu [2009-03-09 21:20:59 +0800]:
>
>> i have fixed it, just exe "fsck /dev/sda4" and press enters :)
>>
>
> Sid's a mess right now...
> Heh.
>
I'd tend to agree, but I don't think this specific case is a problem
with sid. It's just the drive that nee
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:55:18 +0700
Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Frank Lanitz [2009-03-09 14:50:57 +0100]:
>
> > > Sid's a mess right now...
> >
> > And nothing for untrained Debian users IMHO.
>
> Yup, happens every time a new release goes out. We try lotsa new stuff,
> and it's not quite coord
* Frank Lanitz [2009-03-09 14:50:57 +0100]:
> > Sid's a mess right now...
>
> And nothing for untrained Debian users IMHO.
Yup, happens every time a new release goes out. We try lotsa new stuff,
and it's not quite coordinated. reportbug gets lots of exercise, and
upstream gets spanked.
--
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:42:52 +0700
Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Star Liu [2009-03-09 21:20:59 +0800]:
>
>
> > i have fixed it, just exe "fsck /dev/sda4" and press enters :)
>
> Sid's a mess right now...
And nothing for untrained Debian users IMHO.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz
pgpwqV3ihIY
* Star Liu [2009-03-09 21:20:59 +0800]:
> i have fixed it, just exe "fsck /dev/sda4" and press enters :)
Sid's a mess right now...
Heh.
--
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ally.(i.e., without
> -a or -p options)
> fsck died with exit status 4
> failed (code 4)
> An automatic file system check(fsck) of the root filesystem failed. A
> manual fsck must be performed. The fsck should be performed in
> maintance mode with the root filesystem mounted
(code 4)
An automatic file system check(fsck) of the root filesystem failed. A
manual fsck must be performed. The fsck should be performed in
maintance mode with the root filesystem mounted in read-only mode.
failed
William T Wilson wrote:
> > there some kernel parameter I can tweak so that I'll never have to
> > intervene even if the FS is not unmounted cleanly?
>
> Check to make sure that e2fsck is being used with the -a or -p options in
> the startup scripts. That will convert the check at boot from manua
* "Eberhard" == Eberhard Burr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eberhard> 2) similarly, get a mainboard with functioning power-off and
Eberhard> remove the main switch. The pooter can only be switched off
Eberhard> with software assistance then and you should be ok. To
Eberhard> switch on the computer,
Joseph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> kernel parameter I can tweak so that I'll never have to intervene even if
> the FS is not unmounted cleanly?
Three possible solutions (one and a half, that is.):
1) get a UPS and remove the main switch from the pooter. When your
parents switch off t
need to call me at all to
>fix mysterious crashes and OS flakiness, something I would expect regularly
>if they were using Win9x. All the pieces are in place, expect for those
>infrequent instances when my Dad forgets to shutdown before turning the PC
>off, and a manual fsck becomes necessa
ly
if they were using Win9x. All the pieces are in place, expect for those
infrequent instances when my Dad forgets to shutdown before turning the PC
off, and a manual fsck becomes necessary upon the next bootup. Is there some
kernel parameter I can tweak so that I'll never have to intervene e
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Joseph Chung wrote:
> if they were using Win9x. All the pieces are in place, expect for
> those infrequent instances when my Dad forgets to shutdown before
Tell them not to turn the PC off. Best thing to do is configure it to
automatically turn off the screen and any surplus
ly
if they were using Win9x. All the pieces are in place, expect for those
infrequent instances when my Dad forgets to shutdown before turning the PC
off, and a manual fsck becomes necessary upon the next bootup. Is there some
kernel parameter I can tweak so that I'll never have to intervene e
I said yes, (to several
such questions) and when the system came back up, Pine was seg-faulting.
There was no inbound telnet, ftp, finger, nor mail. There was outbound
telnet, ftp, finger, and mail.
I have never before had anything like that happen, even with a manual
fsck. Nothing was put in the lo
22 matches
Mail list logo
