> But in that case your initrd (or the 2nd floppy with the modules) will
> need to contain the modules compatible with your new kernel too.
i understand that, but make-kpkg is supposed to (and always has in the
past) taken care of that for me.
> Save yourself the headache and compile support for
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Adam Shand wrote:
> > It is perfectly possible to say "m" to all types of disks and all
> > filesystems. But then your kernel will not be able to access the
> > disk. Your boot disk must be built into your kernel.
>
> i thought initrd solved that problem by allowing modules
> It is perfectly possible to say "m" to all types of disks and all
> filesystems. But then your kernel will not be able to access the
> disk. Your boot disk must be built into your kernel.
i thought initrd solved that problem by allowing modules to be loaded into
a ram disk before the disk was
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001, Adam Shand wrote:
>
> > Likely you didn't include support for your root fs or the hardware
> > controlling the disk. I once left out support for my IDE controller.
> > It didn't work out too well :-).
>
> Linux IP multicast router 0.06 plus PIM-SM
> RAMDISK: Couldn't fin
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Adam Shand wrote:
> > Likely you didn't include support for your root fs or the hardware
> > controlling the disk. I once left out support for my IDE controller.
> > It didn't work out too well :-).
>
> hrm, i don't think so and i just doubled checked. i copied my .config
>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:04:33PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
|
| > Likely you didn't include support for your root fs or the hardware
| > controlling the disk. I once left out support for my IDE controller.
| > It didn't work out too well :-).
|
| hrm, i don't think so and i just doubled checked.
> Likely you didn't include support for your root fs or the hardware
> controlling the disk. I once left out support for my IDE controller.
> It didn't work out too well :-).
hrm, i don't think so and i just doubled checked. i copied my .config
from my 2.4.14 kernel (which works just fine) to t
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 10:33:56AM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
|
| hey.
|
| i've never tried to run make-kpkg on non-debian'ized kernel source before
| (ie. normally i download kernel-source-2.x.x).
|
| so i downloaded the source, cd'd into it and ran:
|
| make-kpkg --initrd --revision=2:adam.1.0
hey.
i've never tried to run make-kpkg on non-debian'ized kernel source before
(ie. normally i download kernel-source-2.x.x).
so i downloaded the source, cd'd into it and ran:
make-kpkg --initrd --revision=2:adam.1.0 kernel-image
and i get a package that looks and installs fine, but it won't
9 matches
Mail list logo
