> Aye, it’s way too big a topic for the mailing list. If you’re
> interested in the whole debate (as far back as 2003) you can find
> highlights here:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/DefaultMTA
Thanks, that very much answers my question.
I guess if `ssmtp` had been extended to allow local deli
> On 17 Jul 2025, at 20:09, Marco Moock wrote:
>
> On 17.07.2025 19:00 Uhr Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>> I don't have anything against Exim4 (I just happened to choose Postfix
>> many years ago and never had a reason to reconsider that choice).
>> I know basically nothing about Exim4 other than th
On 17.07.2025 19:00 Uhr Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I don't have anything against Exim4 (I just happened to choose Postfix
> many years ago and never had a reason to reconsider that choice).
> I know basically nothing about Exim4 other than the fact that
> installing Postfix instead saved a few kB (no
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 12:54:58PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Why does Debian default to installing Exim4?
Just historical reasons I think: No great mystery, just that a choice
had to be made and that was the choice that was made.
Personally I haven't been too thrilled with Exim's securi
Why does Debian default to installing Exim4?
I just crossgraded two machines (i386->amd64 and armhf->arm64) in
different ways (once with `crosssgrader` and once with a fresh install
followed by manual reconciliation) and in both cases I ended up with
Exim4 installed while I had started with Postfi
On Sb, 13 apr 19, 10:14:04, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> I am looking for an "easy light weight just empty the local queue and
> send it to the smart host" setup.
> I don't mind experimenting and it doesn not need to be Exim but the
> info I get Googling is just too diverse and does not get me much
>
On 2019-04-16, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> > I am looking for an "easy light weight just empty the local queue
>>> > and very very very easy thing: https://wiki.debian.org/sSMTP
>>
>> Note that sSMTP does not perform server certificate verification, thus
>> allowing, e.g., credential steali
Hi,
>> > I am looking for an "easy light weight just empty the local queue
>> > and very very very easy thing: https://wiki.debian.org/sSMTP
>
> Note that sSMTP does not perform server certificate verification, thus
> allowing, e.g., credential stealing via MITM attacks. Furthermore, it
> negle
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:53:05 +
Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> > I am looking for an "easy light weight just empty the local queue
> >> > and very very very easy thing: https://wiki.debian.org/sSMTP
> >
> > Note that sSMTP does not perform server certificate verification, thus
> > allowi
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 22:17:44 +0900
황병희 wrote:
> > I am looking for an "easy light weight just empty the local queue and
>
> Very very very easy thing: https://wiki.debian.org/sSMTP
Note that sSMTP does not perform server certificate verification, thus
allowing, e.g., credential stealing via MIT
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:42:57 +0200
Wim wrote:
> Hi Bonno,
>
> On Sunday, 14 April at 08:00, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
>
> >
> > All along I just installed the standard system on a Debian machine. Created
> > an alias for the root user with the email address of our servicedesk to
> > have it send
Hi Bonno,
On Sunday, 14 April at 08:00, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
>
> All along I just installed the standard system on a Debian machine. Created
> an alias for the root user with the email address of our servicedesk to have
> it send any mails to my servicedesk account and that was it.
> The last
> I am looking for an "easy light weight just empty the local queue and
Very very very easy thing: https://wiki.debian.org/sSMTP
Sincerely, Byung-Hee from South Korea.
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//
Hi.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 10:14:04AM +, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> I am looking for an "easy light weight just empty the local queue and send it
> to the smart host" setup.
apt install nullmailer
Reco
Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All along I just installed the standard system on a Debian machine.
> Created an alias for the root user with the email address of our
> servicedesk to have it send any mails to my servicedesk account and that
> was it. The last Debian installations no longer have a
Hi,
All along I just installed the standard system on a Debian machine. Created an
alias for the root user with the email address of our servicedesk to have it
send any mails to my servicedesk account and that was it.
The last Debian installations no longer have a default mailserver installed an
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 09:24:12 +0100
Richard Bown wrote:
> Hi
> I've now upgraded Claws to 3.7.10 and the crashing when filtering has
> ceased. Even when filtering 4 years of mail.
> I found a problem with trying to upgrade with synaptic as it puts
> gnome as a dependency. Also perl !
> to around t
also sprach Elimar Riesebieter [2009.09.09.2249 +0200]:
> > I don't understand. mutt has no business with $@ or $[0-9], but
> > I think you are probably hit by #545876. Does the patch fix it for
> > you?
>
> No.
I'll need more information then. Maybe you can isolate the entire
argument line pass
* martin f krafft [090909 20:29 +0200]
> also sprach Elimar Riesebieter [2009.09.09.1918 +0200]:
> > This is somewhat overscripted from madduck ;-) The faxt is, that my
> > mutt (hg version from Mutt 1.5.20+lxtecppc (2009-08-04) doesn't
> > interpret neither $@ nor $[0-9]. I'll get over to mutt-de
also sprach Elimar Riesebieter [2009.09.09.1918 +0200]:
> This is somewhat overscripted from madduck ;-) The faxt is, that my
> mutt (hg version from Mutt 1.5.20+lxtecppc (2009-08-04) doesn't
> interpret neither $@ nor $[0-9]. I'll get over to mutt-dev with
> this.
I don't understand. mutt has no
* green [090909 07:51 -0500]
> Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-09 01:10 -0500:
> > * green 09.09.2009
> > > Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-08 15:11 -0500:
> > > > * Michael Wagner 08.09.2009
> > > > > * Elimar Riesebieter 04.09.2009
> > > > > > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscri
Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-09 01:10 -0500:
> * green 09.09.2009
> > Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-08 15:11 -0500:
> > > * Michael Wagner 08.09.2009
> > > > * Elimar Riesebieter 04.09.2009
> > > > > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
> > >
> > > Apart from my other messa
* green 09.09.2009
> Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-08 15:11 -0500:
> > * Michael Wagner 08.09.2009
> > > * Elimar Riesebieter 04.09.2009
> > > > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
> >
> > Apart from my other message you can also make it like this:
> >
> > settings -> apps -
Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-08 15:11 -0500:
> * Michael Wagner 08.09.2009
> > * Elimar Riesebieter 04.09.2009
> > > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
>
> Apart from my other message you can also make it like this:
>
> settings -> apps -> mailto -> /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mut
* Michael Wagner 08.09.2009
> * Elimar Riesebieter 04.09.2009
> > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
Apart from my other message you can also make it like this:
settings -> apps -> mailto -> /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mutt
Hth Michael
--
"Every production of genius must be the pr
* Elimar Riesebieter 04.09.2009
> I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
>
> Shellscript:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec xterm -e mutt "$@"
>
> The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
>
> Any hints?
Hello Elimar,
in the mutt package is the shellscript /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mutt, which
is th
* s. keeling [090907 02:14 +]
> Elimar Riesebieter :
> > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
> >
> > Shellscript:
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > exec xterm -e mutt "$@"
> >
> > The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
> >
> > Any hints?
>
> Ben at linuxgazette.net and I've been p
Elimar Riesebieter :
> I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
>
> Shellscript:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec xterm -e mutt "$@"
>
> The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
>
> Any hints?
Ben at linuxgazette.net and I've been playing with this for years (I
haven't used it in a while; ca
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 03:00:13PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
>
> Shellscript:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec xterm -e mutt "$@"
>
> The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
I use following in lenny and works fine:
--
#!/bin/sh
gnome-terminal -e "m
* Clive Standbridge [090904 16:47 +0100]
> > I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
> >
> > Shellscript:
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > exec xterm -e mutt "$@"
> >
> > The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
>
> That's very close to the script that is working for me (using
> Iceweasel 3.0.6 o
> I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
>
> Shellscript:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec xterm -e mutt "$@"
>
> The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
That's very close to the script that is working for me (using
Iceweasel 3.0.6 on Lenny):
#!/bin/sh
prefixWords=
if
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
Shellscript:
#!/bin/sh
exec xterm -e mutt "$@"
I'm guessing mutt can't parse the mailto: line given out by iceweasel.
Here's a very quick and very dirty bit of perl I knocked up; I'm not
suggesting it's right, b
I've tried settings -> apps -> mailto -> shellscript
Shellscript:
#!/bin/sh
exec xterm -e mutt "$@"
The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
Any hints?
Thanks
Elimar
--
It's a good thing we don't get all
the government we pay for.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.d
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 12:48 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/28/08 11:38, Shachar Or wrote:
> > On Monday 28 July 2008 19:34, Frank Charles Gallacher wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> I am running Evolution 2.6.3 on "etch" kernel 2.6.18-6-686.
>
On Monday 28 July 2008 20:48, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Do KDE apps mesh well with GNOME apps?
I've almost never tried GNOME...
The KDE PIM suite is the the free PIM suite with the most features and
integration.
>
> --
> Ron Johnson, Jr.
> Jefferson LA USA
>
> "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/08 11:38, Shachar Or wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2008 19:34, Frank Charles Gallacher wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I am running Evolution 2.6.3 on "etch" kernel 2.6.18-6-686.
>>
>> I trying to import a list of email adresses in .CSV format.
>> The
On Monday 28 July 2008 19:34, Frank Charles Gallacher wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am running Evolution 2.6.3 on "etch" kernel 2.6.18-6-686.
>
> I trying to import a list of email adresses in .CSV format.
> The import works OK, but I'm having trouble creating a contact list.
> I can select all the ema
Greetings,
I am running Evolution 2.6.3 on "etch" kernel 2.6.18-6-686.
I trying to import a list of email adresses in .CSV format.
The import works OK, but I'm having trouble creating a contact list.
I can select all the emails, but doing a "drag and drop" just does not
want to work...
Can anyon
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:34:17PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
>
> Hi, When I click on email address on the epiphaty browser, evolution
> is called by defaut, I want to use thunderbird instead, when to change it
>
> thanks a lot
> bela
Hi,
In Gnome, on Debian Etch (stable), I go to Desk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, When I click on email address on the epiphaty browser, evolution
is called by defaut, I want to use thunderbird instead, when to change it
thanks a lot
bela
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
Russell L. Harris wrote:
I need a method to email a weekly Bible study to a list of a hundred
or so recipients.
I found in the Debian archive a package named "libmail-bulkmail-perl".
I installed the package and looked at the example files in
"/usr/share/doc/libmail-bulkmail-perl", but I have bee
* Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061212 18:00]:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 06:58:36AM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote:
>> It appears that all of the Mailman documentation assumes that the
>> host has a valid publicly-accessible URL. If that is a
>> requirement, then I cannot use Mailman.
>
>
* David E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061212 22:00]:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:58:36 -0600
> "Russell L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > So now I'm intimidated. I'm thinking that perhaps that it would be
> > better to use Mutt with an alias list.
>
> Or even:
>
> $ for i in `cat recipi
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:58:36 -0600
"Russell L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So now I'm intimidated. I'm thinking that perhaps that it would be
> better to use Mutt with an alias list.
Or even:
$ for i in `cat recipients`
do
mail -s "Weekly study" $i < study_this_week_file
sleep 2
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 06:58:36AM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Please note that my SOLE interest in Mailman is one-way transmission
> -- implementation of an "announce only" newsletter, rather than a
> traditional mailing list.
My largest Mailman list is an announcement-only list. It's pret
On 2006-12-11 @ 07:50:07 (week 50) Russell L. Harris wrote:
> I need a method to email a weekly Bible study to a list of a hundred
> or so recipients.
>
> I found in the Debian archive a package named "libmail-bulkmail-perl".
> I installed the package and looked at the example files in
> "/usr/sh
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 06:58:36AM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061211 08:13]:
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:50:07AM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> >> I need a method to email a weekly Bible study to a list of a hundred
> >> or so recipients.
> ...
* Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061211 08:13]:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:50:07AM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote:
>> I need a method to email a weekly Bible study to a list of a hundred
>> or so recipients.
...
>> I found in the Debian archive a package named >
>> "libmail-bulkmail-per
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:50:07AM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> I found in the Debian archive a package named "libmail-bulkmail-perl".
The "lib" at the start means it's a library. You haven't installed a
program, you've installed a collection of predefined functions which can
be used to writ
On Dec 11, 9:00 am, "Russell L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need a method to email a weekly Bible study to a list of a hundred
> or so recipients.
>
> I found in the Debian archive a package named "libmail-bulkmail-perl".
> I installed the package and looked at the example files in
> "
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:50:07AM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> I need a method to email a weekly Bible study to a list of a hundred
> or so recipients.
I've been using Mailman (Python-based) for years with no significant
problems that weren't my own damn fault. Requires running an MTA.
--
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:50:07AM -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> I need a method to email a weekly Bible study to a list of a hundred
> or so recipients.
>
> I found in the Debian archive a package named "libmail-bulkmail-perl".
> I installed the package and looked at the example files in
> "/
I need a method to email a weekly Bible study to a list of a hundred
or so recipients.
I found in the Debian archive a package named "libmail-bulkmail-perl".
I installed the package and looked at the example files in
"/usr/share/doc/libmail-bulkmail-perl", but I have been unable to
understand how
On 10/18/2005 04:20 PM, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:04:17AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
>> When I send mail using /usr/bin/mail, the From: address is wrong; it's
>> apparently just prepending my user-id to my domainname.
>>
>> How can I tell mail to use a different
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:04:17AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> When I send mail using /usr/bin/mail, the From: address is wrong; it's
> apparently just prepending my user-id to my domainname.
>
> How can I tell mail to use a different From: address? I've trawled
> through the docs, but not f
When I send mail using /usr/bin/mail, the From: address is wrong; it's
apparently just prepending my user-id to my domainname.
How can I tell mail to use a different From: address? I've trawled
through the docs, but not found an answer... [the docs are pretty weird
to tell the truth -- they're a
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:29:28PM +, Stephen Patterson wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:00:19 +0100, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > I wonder if the classic recipe from the perl cookbook needs some
> > readjustment in debian due to sendmail being a link to exim? I tried
> > to implement it and was
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:00:19 +0100, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> I wonder if the classic recipe from the perl cookbook needs some
> readjustment in debian due to sendmail being a link to exim? I tried
> to implement it and was giving me a bunch of errors. Does it need some
> adjustment, or works just
I wonder if the classic recipe from the perl cookbook needs some
readjustment in debian due to sendmail being a link to exim? I tried
to implement it and was giving me a bunch of errors. Does it need some
adjustment, or works just the way it is?
TTA.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
hi everybody,
I am using mozilla mailer ( Debian distribution) to
send and receive my emails. On the mail server LDAP is
used and the list of all the users is available. I
want to get and include it my mozilla client to send
for example a message to all users.
someone has an idea how to do it
Maestro listed.
If neither of these work, you may need to upgrade to (or, eek! compile)
a new kernel.
Also, and this is important, you'll need to add your users to the audio
group. You do this with a command like "adduser chuck audio" as root.
4. X video
Try running "dpkg
On Sat, 08 May 2004 02:00:08 +0200, in linux.debian.user you wrote:
>Please read the letter attached- I didn't have enough
>time to re-write it, and this is important! Scan it-
So important you couldn't be bothered to rewrite it? I guess our time is a lot
less valuable, eh?
Drop the sarcasm and
chuck boothe wrote:
...
Could you, would you plleeeaaae look down from your mount of
knowledge just long enough to give me- line by line (VERBATIM)- the
directions that I need to access root through a terminal (yes, I do
you need to provide more info about what problem you have. Generally
o
On 2004-05-07, chuck boothe penned:
> --0-1985073078-1083972915=:72679 Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset=us-ascii Content-Id: Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Please read the letter attached- I didn't have enough time to re-write
> it, and this is important! Scan it- there are no viruses included-
Please read the letter attached- I didn't have enough
time to re-write it, and this is important! Scan it-
there are no viruses included- just a lot of begging
from a man desperate to use the operating system
(Debian) that he's installed and can't figure out- not
even the mailserver thingy.
PLEASE
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 08:10:46PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
| I still just don't know what to do about Postfix. My hostname is
| "desk".
Ok.
| My ISP is comcast.net -- should I tell postfix my "mail name"
| is comcast.net, so mail appears to come from [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
| things like popu
I still just don't know what to do about Postfix. My hostname is
"desk". My ISP is comcast.net -- should I tell postfix my "mail name"
is comcast.net, so mail appears to come from [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
things like popularity contest? I have configured Mutt to use a valid
email for the From;
| > What exactly does error "334 VXNlcm5hbWU6" mean?
The 334 is the response code from the server. The data after it is
base64 encoded and decodes to "Username:".
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:03:21PM -0500, Jerome R. Acks wrote:
| Solved. I had to change entries in /etc/email-addresses from
| [EMA
host after a long failure
> period
> *** Frozen (delivery error message)
>
> If I try to thaw message and deliver with "exim -M", I get:
>
> 23:42:24 1Acziv-X5-00 Unfrozen by forced delivery
> 23:42:24 1Acziv-X5-00 SMTP error from remote mailer after AUTH
> P
-00 Unfrozen by forced delivery
23:42:24 1Acziv-X5-00 SMTP error from remote mailer after AUTH
PLAIN: host outgoing.verizon.net [206.46.170.8]: 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
23:42:24 1Acziv-X5-00 == [EMAIL PROTECTED] T=remote_smtp
defer (0): SMTP error from remote mailer after AUTH PLAIN: host
outgo
> > [Micha Feigin schreef op 01-01-2004 21:52 +0200]
> >
> > I would like to make a shortcut to switch between the previous and
> > current desk/page. Something like Alt-tab does for windows (I would
> > settle for just the current and previous ones on the stack,
>
> I use control alt left and rig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:10:37AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi.keep getting e-mails from a MAILER DAEMON, sayin that
> an e-mail that i sent out didnt go through, i looked in my mail sent
> box and it was full of Sent ma
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 02:10:37 EST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi.keep getting e-mails from a MAILER DAEMON, sayin that
> an e-mail that i sent out didnt go through, i looked in my mail sent
> box and it was full of Sent mail with a subject i never heard of sent
> to ov
Hi.keep getting e-mails from a MAILER DAEMON, sayin that an e-mail that i sent out didnt go through, i looked in my mail sent box and it was full of Sent mail with a subject i never heard of sent to over 40 people..i never sent these e-mails, i want it to stop and i dont
Hi.keep getting e-mails from a MAILER DAEMON, sayin that an e-mail that i sent out didnt go through, i looked in my mail sent box and it was full of Sent mail with a subject i never heard of sent to over 40 people..i never sent these e-mails, i want it to stop and i dont
Hi.keep getting e-mails from a MAILER DAEMON, sayin that an e-mail that i sent out didnt go through, i looked in my mail sent box and it was full of Sent mail with a subject i never heard of sent to over 40 people..i never sent these e-mails, i want it to stop and i dont
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 12:52 am, Johann Koenig wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:42:04 -0700
>
> Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:32:23 +0200
> >
> > David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What can I do about something like this? Apparently, the host is
>
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:42:04 -0700
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:32:23 +0200
> David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What can I do about something like this? Apparently, the host is
> > unknown, so complaining to the ISP doesn't make sense, does it? Am I
> >
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:32:23 +0200
David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What can I do about something like this? Apparently, the host is
> unknown, so complaining to the ISP doesn't make sense, does it? Am I the
> only one receiving this for every mail I send to the list?
Nope, just got
Hi group,
What can I do about something like this? Apparently, the host is
unknown, so complaining to the ISP doesn't make sense, does it? Am I the
only one receiving this for every mail I send to the list?
David
The original message was received at Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:41:11 -0400
from d01av0
Hi,
is there any mailer as for ex. mutt but with a
graphical front-end in console ? Debian Woody.
Thanks for your help
mess-mate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. I found a bug in the sendmail module in the Mail::Mailer package
of perl. Someone told the maintainer that if -t is used then the
address does not need to be on the command line, but sendmail 8.12.1
disagrees, for my own use I changed it, putting the @$to as the last
argument, but it would
mal.
I've currently got
:0
* ^From:.*naver\.com
/dev/null
but I've also tried the following conditions
* ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* ^From:.*NAVER-MAILER
and none of them seem to work.
I've been using procmail for a while now, so I generally understand what
I'm doing.
OK kids, whose mailer is b0rken? I'm sure mine doesn't set
"CC: debian", and can't I check the headers in original
message as I've already deleted it.
Figuring out what's wrong with "CC: debian" is left as an
exercise to the reader.
- Forwar
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:17:51PM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> WTF?
Don't waste your time on it, the site is completely b0rked. Anyone who
posts to debian-user gets a bounce. I tried to attent them, but got
into a network nightmare. They don't have a postmaster, the postmaster
for their upst
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:17:51 CDT, Dimitri Maziuk writes:
>WTF?
It´s a bounce (eg user doesn´t exist/mailbox full/anything).
Whatever.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces.
It´s all base64-encoded, charset="eur-kr" (I´d guess that Korean, but
I could be wrong) ...
It´s now submitted at http://www.rfc-i
WTF?
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:13:39 +0900 (KST)
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ¸ÞÀÏ Àü¼Û ½ÇÆÐ ¾Ë¸² <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: NAVER Mailer 1.0
[1][logo_dmnaver.gif]
??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:
>Gavin Hamill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Listar also has a lovely web-configuration frontend so lusers who can't
>> figure out how to use a -request admin address can adjust their settings
>
>Is it better
Gavin Hamill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Listar also has a lovely web-configuration frontend so lusers who can't
> figure out how to use a -request admin address can adjust their settings
Is it better than mailman's web frontend? Considering that mailman
lusers still can't seem to unsubscribe
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:30:18 BST, Gavin Hamill writes:
>On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Robert Waldner wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:03:19 +0200, Joakim Nordlander writes:
>> > The mailing list is currently using Majordomo, but I'm thinking of moving
>> >to Smartlist.
>>
>> Try listar. Fast, flexible a
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Robert Waldner wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:03:19 +0200, Joakim Nordlander writes:
> > The mailing list is currently using Majordomo, but I'm thinking of moving
> >to Smartlist.
>
> Try listar. Fast, flexible and with a _very_ helpful mailing list.
Listar also has a lovely
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:03:19 +0200, Joakim Nordlander writes:
> The mailing list is currently using Majordomo, but I'm thinking of moving
>to Smartlist.
Try listar. Fast, flexible and with a _very_ helpful mailing list.
cheers,
&rw
--
-- C'mon, which [luser] is it, standard or metric? I'd say
JN> If I gather correctly Smail was once the recommended or the standard mail
JN> processing software with Debian. But as of version 2.1 Smail was dropped
JN> from Debian due to some serious bugs or something like that.
JN> I decided to stay with Smail for a little longer as I knew Smail pretty
If I gather correctly Smail was once the recommended or the standard mail
processing software with Debian. But as of version 2.1 Smail was dropped
from Debian due to some serious bugs or something like that.
I decided to stay with Smail for a little longer as I knew Smail pretty
well, and I didn
c
> > > isn't
> > > that hard to deal with - maybe ten minutes a day, if you've got a good
> > > mailer.
> > >
> > Yep. It was the amount on trafic on debian-user which forced me to abandon
> > netscape mail client and learn how to use fet
in it was using ODP: instead of Re: in his subject
>lines. That might have done it.
Damn, that *would* be a broken mailer ...
I suppose it might have been things like bad format=flowed handling, or
maybe it just fell over on the threading. Was it any particular message?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:05:19PM +, Pollywog wrote:
> What was in that "Debian chicken" thread anyway? It kept crashing XFMail.
> I am a vegetarian, but I didn't know XFMail was too ;)
One of the people in it was using ODP: instead of Re: in his subject
lines. That might have done it.
Chr
What was in that "Debian chicken" thread anyway? It kept crashing XFMail.
I am a vegetarian, but I didn't know XFMail was too ;)
--
Andrew
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 06:47:26PM +0200, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> How can I avoid this type of behaviour ?
> When I tell exim to use the smtp.free.fr - I have rights to use it as a
> smarthost -, I receive a message like this. How can I repair this ?
> SMTP error from remote maile
be delivered to all of its recipients. The
following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1754:
host smtp.free.fr [212.27.32.5]:
501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender domain must exist
-- This
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
