Re: correct settings of /var/mail/user?

2021-07-08 Thread David Wright
On Thu 08 Jul 2021 at 10:46:08 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 04:35:48PM +0200, Hans wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2021, 16:27:38 CEST schrieb The Wanderer: > > Zhat is strange, as I also can not delete the file /var/mail/myusername > > manually - just because of acces

Re: correct settings of /var/mail/user?

2021-07-08 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 04:35:48PM +0200, Hans wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2021, 16:27:38 CEST schrieb The Wanderer: > Zhat is strange, as I also can not delete the file /var/mail/myusername > manually - just because of access rights. You're not supposed to be able to delete that file. You s

Re: correct settings of /var/mail/user?

2021-07-08 Thread Hans
Am Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2021, 16:27:38 CEST schrieb The Wanderer: Zhat is strange, as I also can not delete the file /var/mail/myusername manually - just because of access rights. IMO this should be possible also without mutt. Best Hans > $ ls -lhd /var/ > drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 4.0K Jul 4 14

Re: correct settings of /var/mail/user?

2021-07-08 Thread The Wanderer
On 2021-07-08 at 10:18, Hans wrote: > Hi folks, > > I ran into the problem with mutt. Mutt can not delete my mails due > to the access rights. > > Looks like something is not correct set. Can someone tell me the > correctsetting? > > Mine are these at the moment: > > ls -la / | grep var > drw

correct settings of /var/mail/user?

2021-07-08 Thread Hans
Hi folks, I ran into the problem with mutt. Mutt can not delete my mails due to the access rights. Looks like something is not correct set. Can someone tell me the correctsetting? Mine are these at the moment: ls -la / | grep var drwxr-xr-x 14 root root4096 18. Mai 11:33 var ls -la /var

Re: mail user log

2006-03-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 27.03.06 16:32, Pol Hallen wrote: > is it possible receive a mail when a user do a successful login?! simplest way should be installing some log checker which will be configured to mail if login is found in logs... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning:

mail user log

2006-03-27 Thread Pol Hallen
Hi all :-) is it possible receive a mail when a user do a successful login?! tnks ;-) Pol -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

restricting mail user to internal mail

2004-02-05 Thread Hans du Plooy
Hi all, This is not my decision, but company policy of one of our clients: I need to restrict some users to sending mail internally only, and also receiving no mail from outside. So far I've done: main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/re

Re: exporting /var/spool/mail/user as mailbox

2003-06-22 Thread Matt Price
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:49:31PM -0400, Matt Price wrote: > have access to a Windows pc and a modem connection. I would like to > be able to pick up my mai, which I can do already through my > university account; but I'd rather not have to refilter it and reread > it all when I get back home. s

Re: exporting /var/spool/mail/user as mailbox

2003-06-20 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:49:31PM -0400, Matt Price wrote: [...] | I am about to go on an extended vacation, during which time I'll only | have access to a Windows pc and a modem connection. I would like to | be able to pick up my mai, [...] Options (in my order of preference, but YMMV) : 1

Re: exporting /var/spool/mail/user as mailbox

2003-06-20 Thread Vineet Kumar
e to export the > mailspool on my work computer as a pop or IMAP mailbox , which I can > then access from the net to download my mail. > > Can this be done? Yup. Just install an IMAP server. I prefer courier-imap, but it works using Maildirs in $HOME/Maildir by default, not /var/

Re: exporting /var/spool/mail/user as mailbox

2003-06-20 Thread David Raeker-Jordan
Matt Price wrote: > I get my mail through a university account, which I download and > filter every ten minutes on my work machine. > > I am about to go on an extended vacation, during which time I'll only > have access to a Windows pc and a modem connection. I would like to > be able to pick up

exporting /var/spool/mail/user as mailbox

2003-06-20 Thread Matt Price
Hey folks, here's the situation: I get my mail through a university account, which I download and filter every ten minutes on my work machine. I am about to go on an extended vacation, during which time I'll only have access to a Windows pc and a modem connection. I would like to be able to pic

Re: exim, delivery to /home/user instead of /var/mail/user

2002-11-12 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:54:11AM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > However, the mails still end up in /var/spool/exim/input > How can i change this and split the mails to /home/user1 > and /home/user2 ? Have you told fetchmail where the mail should go? It should look something like this: poll m

Re: exim, delivery to /home/user instead of /var/mail/user

2002-11-12 Thread Benedict Verheyen
- Original Message - From: "Gerald Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:32 PM Subject: Re: exim, delivery to /home/user instead of /var/mail/user > On Tue 12 Nov 2002 13:40:33 +0100 > "Benedict Ve

Re: exim, delivery to /home/user instead of /var/mail/user

2002-11-12 Thread Gerald Livingston
On Tue 12 Nov 2002 13:40:33 +0100 "Benedict Verheyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >What he was trying to put across is that in the DEFAULT Debian > >install of Exim any mail passed to it by fetchmail shuld > >automatically be delivered to /var/mail/{username}. If the user has a > >~/.procmailrc t

Re: exim, delivery to /home/user instead of /var/mail/user

2002-11-12 Thread Shyamal Prasad
"Benedict" == Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Benedict> I deleted the files in /etc/exim, ran eximconfig. Then i Benedict> restarted both exim and fetchmail but the mail ends up Benedict> in /var/spool/exim/input again. This is my Benedict> /etc/fetchmailrc file:

Re: Re: exim, delivery to /home/user instead of /var/mail/user

2002-11-12 Thread Benedict Verheyen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Tue 12 Nov 2002 08:42:43 +0100 >"Benedict Verheyen" wrote: > >> >> Shyamal Prasad wrote: >> >> >> >Make sure your pop lines have a "is 'userx' here" li

Re: exim, delivery to /home/user instead of /var/mail/user

2002-11-12 Thread Gerald Livingston
On Tue 12 Nov 2002 08:42:43 +0100 "Benedict Verheyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Make sure your pop lines have a "is 'userx' here" line to get the > >mail to the right users. > It does ha

Re: Re: exim, delivery to /home/user instead of /var/mail/user

2002-11-11 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Make sure your pop lines have a "is 'userx' here" line to get the mail >to the right users. It does have such a line. Yet it puts all mail in /var/spool/exim/input. When you are fetching mail for

Re: exim, delivery to /home/user instead of /var/mail/user

2002-11-11 Thread Shyamal Prasad
"Benedict" == Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Benedict> Hi, i'm trying to install a mail server but i'm stuck Benedict> with exim. I run fetchmail and exim gets the mail from Benedict> fetchmail (running as a daemon). I have 2 users on the Benedict> system and my

exim, delivery to /home/user instead of /var/mail/user

2002-11-11 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Hi, i'm trying to install a mail server but i'm stuck with exim. I run fetchmail and exim gets the mail from fetchmail (running as a daemon). I have 2 users on the system and my /etc/fetchmailrc contains 2 pop lines to check the mail from the users. 1)I run fetchmail in daemon mode as root: root

Re: mail user

2002-05-17 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 11:42:56AM +0100, Ben Cooling wrote: > The primary group of my mail user is set to "lp". Is this correct? I > would have expected it to be the "mail" group. No. mail's primary group should be mail, with uid and gid 8. lp should be ui

mail user

2002-05-17 Thread Ben Cooling
The primary group of my mail user is set to "lp". Is this correct? I would have expected it to be the "mail" group. I am running sid, and the first mta I installed was EXIM (IIRC this creates the mail user). Thanks, Ben. -- Ben Cooling Technical Consultant Nexo

Re: ~Maildir and /var/spool/mail/$USER

2002-01-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Américo Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.09.1843 +0100]: > I'm running Maildir, wich is configured to deliver mail > to ~/home/Maildir. But somehow, some messages, are still > being delivered to /var/spool/mail/$USER. I *don't* even > have exim running

Re: ~Maildir and /var/spool/mail/$USER

2002-01-09 Thread dsr
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:43:33PM +, Am?rico Rocha wrote: > > Hi all > > I have a serious problem with my portato box > > I'm running Maildir, wich is configured to deliver mail > to ~/home/Maildir. But somehow, some messages, are still > being delivered to /v

~Maildir and /var/spool/mail/$USER

2002-01-09 Thread Américo Rocha
Hi all I have a serious problem with my portato box I'm running Maildir, wich is configured to deliver mail to ~/home/Maildir. But somehow, some messages, are still being delivered to /var/spool/mail/$USER. I *don't* even have exim running Does someone have some tip to so9lve this

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-12-10 Thread Paul Mackinney
Paul Mackinney muttered: Thanks very much. I'll use the .forward method for now, check out procmail someday... Paul -- Paul Mackinney | Who profited from Sept 11? [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.copvcia.com/

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-12-09 Thread Craig Dickson
Paul Mackinney wrote: > Could someone post a concrete example of using folder hooks to > switch the "From: " header depending on which folder you're in? > > I'd like to use the following logic: > > if current folder is college.mbox > send mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > else >

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-12-09 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 07:18:21PM -0800, Paul Mackinney wrote: > > if $h_From: contains "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" then > save /dev/null > finish > endif I wouldn't know how to do this with Mutt, but certainly with procmail. :0: * ^From:[EMA

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-12-09 Thread Paul Mackinney
This list sold me on mutt long ago. If I didn't already know vi/vim, I might be seduced by the emac crowd. Could someone post a concrete example of using folder hooks to switch the "From: " header depending on which folder you're in? I'd like to use the following logic: if current folder is co

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-21 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 05:57:14AM -0600, Bud Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wednesday 21 November 2001 05:42 am, Jussi Ekholm wrote: > > Amen. Once I tried Mutt, I really couldn't switch for anything > > else - Mutt seems to cover *all* the aspects I expect from MUA; > > and you mentioned

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-21 Thread nate
dman said: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:30:12PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > | Gnus has some distinct advantages over mutt. In particular, it > has | superior imap support, especially offline support, which was > the | primary reason I switched from mutt. > > Mutt has geat off-line support : mbo

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-21 Thread Brian Nelson
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:30:12PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > | Gnus has some distinct advantages over mutt. In particular, it has > | superior imap support, especially offline support, which was the > | primary reason I switched from mutt. > > Mutt has

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-21 Thread dman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:30:12PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: | Gnus has some distinct advantages over mutt. In particular, it has | superior imap support, especially offline support, which was the | primary reason I switched from mutt. Mutt has geat off-line support : mbox, maildir, mh, . M

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-21 Thread Brian Nelson
Bud Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 21 November 2001 05:48 am, Jussi Ekholm wrote: > > Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > So I am back to mutt and slrn again - and enjoying it. And I will not > > > easily try out gnus again. > > > When it comes to MUAs, I've bee

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-21 Thread David Harrigan
I use mutt in an office environment that is run by M$. Mutt handles attachments (such as word docs etc..) very well - it just decodes the stream, then pressing 'v' allows you to 'view' the file then 's' to save the file to your hd somewhere...all in all, I'm very happy with mutt also... -=

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-21 Thread Bud Rogers
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 05:48 am, Jussi Ekholm wrote: > Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So I am back to mutt and slrn again - and enjoying it. And I will not > > easily try out gnus again. > When it comes to MUAs, I've been *thinking* of trying Gnus, but > for to date, haven

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-21 Thread Bud Rogers
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 05:42 am, Jussi Ekholm wrote: > Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Now I use mutt, which allows me to use my own text editor (emacs), > > supports multiple accounts, doesn't crash, supports all the common > > mailbox formats (I prefer maildir), intelligent

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-21 Thread Jussi Ekholm
Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I am back to mutt and slrn again - and enjoying it. And I will not > easily try out gnus again. Mutt and slrn inside the same screen - now, that's a bliss. :-) After I got introduced to the mentioned readers, I haven't even tried to look for a better s

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-21 Thread Jussi Ekholm
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I use mutt, which allows me to use my own text editor (emacs), > supports multiple accounts, doesn't crash, supports all the common > mailbox formats (I prefer maildir), intelligently handles mailing lists, > and is configurable as hell. Amen. Once I

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-16 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:26:11PM -0800, Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > spear wrote: <...> > Now I use mutt, which allows me to use my own text editor (emacs), > supports multiple accounts, doesn't crash, supports all the common > mailbox formats (I prefer maildir), intelligently ha

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-16 Thread dman
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:54:36AM +0100, op wrote: | Also sprach "Timo: | | > b) evolution: needs lots of dependencies (many from GNOME) and was | > broken in sid last time, but when it works, it is just the best; a pure | > Outlook clone but better! (mail, contacts, tasks, calendar, portal...)

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-16 Thread Erik Steffl
op wrote: > > Also sprach "Timo: > > > b) evolution: needs lots of dependencies (many from GNOME) and was > > broken in sid last time, but when it works, it is just the best; a pure > > Outlook clone but better! (mail, contacts, tasks, calendar, portal...) > > I've been looking to migrate from k

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-16 Thread op
Also sprach "Timo: > b) evolution: needs lots of dependencies (many from GNOME) and was > broken in sid last time, but when it works, it is just the best; a pure > Outlook clone but better! (mail, contacts, tasks, calendar, portal...) I've been looking to migrate from kmail to evolution for a lon

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-15 Thread John Hasler
Johann Spies writes: > After a dist-upgrade, gnus complained about the format of some of my mail > and would not read it. This happened on two machines. I could not access > especially older mail using gnus. I've been using gnus for about five years, have about 80M of mail on hand right now, and

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-15 Thread Johann Spies
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 10:45:14AM -0800, Dave Carrigan wrote: > Gnus. I have used Gnus for about six months and then abandoned it. Reason: After a dist-upgrade, gnus complained about the format of some of my mail and would not read it. This happened on two machines. I could not access especiall

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-15 Thread Erik Steffl
Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > Hi, > > (I'm not sure if this is on topic, but hey, I'am debian-user...) > I used to use netscape's messenger to read my mail, but I've had it with > that one. Then I tried pine for a while, but I'm not sure about that one > either. > So I thought before trying all MUAs th

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-15 Thread Brian Nelson
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Brian Nelson wrote: > > > And, in the end, you will find true bliss with gnus. > > No, because I use emacs as a text editor, not a desktop platform. I > don't even use emacs's shell windows, much less use it as an ftp client > or a bad, hideously slow

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-15 Thread Raghavendra Bhat
[Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:47:58PM -0500] dman : > | Now I use mutt, which allows me to use my own text editor (emacs), > > Ditto, but ugh (I use vim :-)). Zile (zile is lossy emacs) is a fantastic drop-in replacement for vim. Emacs-like key-bindings and loads up very fast when called from wi

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Craig Dickson
Brian Nelson wrote: > And, in the end, you will find true bliss with gnus. No, because I use emacs as a text editor, not a desktop platform. I don't even use emacs's shell windows, much less use it as an ftp client or a bad, hideously slow web browser (I tried that a while back just for laughs, b

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Craig Dickson
dman wrote: > check the User-Agent: or X-Mailer: headers to see what people are > using. Yes, good advice. I do this when I see someone sending out screwed-up messages. Usually they're using Outlook or Netscape. > On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:26:11PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote: > > | Now I use mu

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Brian Nelson
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now I use mutt, which allows me to use my own text editor (emacs), > supports multiple accounts, doesn't crash, supports all the common > mailbox formats (I prefer maildir), intelligently handles mailing lists, > and is configurable as hell. And, in the

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread dman
First : check the User-Agent: or X-Mailer: headers to see what people are using. On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:26:11PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote: | Now I use mutt, which allows me to use my own text editor (emacs), Ditto, but ugh (I use vim :-)). | supports multiple accounts, What do you mean

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Jason Wojciechowski
Craig Dickson wrote: | developers didn't seem interested in the idea of automatically | checking the mailbox (not a server, but the local mailbox itself) | every few minutes, which I wanted because I use fetchmail to retrieve Sylpheed does that (now). I have a fetchmail setup that grabs my ma

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Corey Halpin
Doesn't anyone use exmh besides me? Maybe I'm just strange. blah, blah, blah, I like it. crh -- Corey R. Halpin (http://www.cae.wisc.edu/~halpin/ ) Student of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Glyn Millington
If you have a _lot_ of mail, and subscribing to this list sets you off to a good start!, then you could do much worse than Gnus with a version of (X)Emacs. Hard to begin with, but brilliant! Glyn -- ** * Here

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So I thought before trying all MUAs there are, I just ask you what you > think is the best one. > I think I prefer something graphical, and able of using multiple > accounts. Gnus. Is there something else ? :) -- begin OjE-ist-scheisse.txt bye, Joerg

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Craig Dickson
spear wrote: > Nobody mentioned Sylpheed, mostly available for Woody because of the libc6 & > co updated libraries ... > > I like it because it's available in many languages, like mine (french) and > is easy to use/configure ... I tried Sylpheed for a while earlier this year. It was the only GUI

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread spear
Nobody mentioned Sylpheed, mostly available for Woody because of the libc6 & co updated libraries ... I like it because it's available in many languages, like mine (french) and is easy to use/configure ... Mathias

RE: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Brooks R. Robinson
| Aethera is another client for kde (currently no debs, AFAIK). | Aethera is available in testing and up. There are debs available from kde.debian.com for potato! Brooks

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Dave Carrigan
Gnus. -- Dave Carrigan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])| Yow! ...A housewife is wearing a UNIX-Apache-Perl-Linux-Firewalls-LDAP-C-DNS | polypyrene jumpsuit!! Seattle, WA, USA| http://www.rudedog.org/ |

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Rich Rudnick
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 09:04, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > Hi, > > (I'm not sure if this is on topic, but hey, I'am debian-user...) > I used to use netscape's messenger to read my mail, but I've had it with > that one. Then I tried pine for a while, but I'm not sure about that one > either. > So I thought

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread DvB
"Timo Boewing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > d) KMail, if using KDE, is very well also; now with IMAP support (like > said before) > Aethera is another client for kde (currently no debs, AFAIK). http://www.thekompany.com/projects/aethera/ HTH

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Shaya Potter
using cvs builds of evolution on sid. works great. deb http://people.debian.org/~kitame/gnome/snapshot . On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 12:04, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > Hi, > > (I'm not sure if this is on topic, but hey, I'am debian-user...) > I used to use netscape's messenger to read my mail, but I've ha

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Timo Boewing
Hello, if you want a MUA not using console, I recommend these: a) mozilla-mail: faster from version to version, capable of having multiple email accounts per user (in contrast to the old netscape mailer), good filtering, threading (good for majordomo lists like this here) b) evolution: needs

Re: Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Kurt Lieber
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 09:04 am, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > I think I prefer something graphical, and able of using multiple > accounts. I know this was discussed extensively a few months back -- you should probably check the archives. That said, I use and really like KMail. Version 1.2 (pota

Which mail user agent do you use?

2001-11-14 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, (I'm not sure if this is on topic, but hey, I'am debian-user...) I used to use netscape's messenger to read my mail, but I've had it with that one. Then I tried pine for a while, but I'm not sure about that one either. So I thought before trying all MUAs there are, I just ask you what you thin

Re: /var/spool/mail/USER

2001-10-22 Thread Osamu Aoki
I think I miss interpreted original poster's message. Vector send me a following message. I hope this solves your problem. > I'm replying to you off-list because I don't want this email address > spammed to carnation. procmail will change the permissions on a > mailbox when it delivers mail if

Re: /var/spool/mail/USER

2001-10-22 Thread Osamu Aoki
this mis-owned MBOX created to start with. FYI: Debian default MTA is exim. On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 12:26:43PM +0200, Davi Leal wrote: > Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3 > Mailbox (/var/spool/mail/user) has to be owned by the user who is > recipient and group mail, otherwise the old, "mis-o

/var/spool/mail/USER

2001-10-22 Thread Davi Leal
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3   Mailbox (/var/spool/mail/user) has to be owned by the user who is recipient and group mail, otherwise the old, "mis-owned," mailbox gets renamed "BOGUS.blah," and a new mailbox with proper ownership gets created.   But what is happening?. The new m

Re: Well I don't know for sure to be honest, but I certainly don't think it is good manners to put your entire message in the subject of your message. I mean, you could do it of course, and it will probably work, too. But should you? And what will your audience think of it? After all, the subject is really just meant to be an indicator of what's in the actual message. But I couldn't find anything in your message, so I thought I should be writing you about it in this way, so you would best see the point I am trying to make. It is also a lot harder to insert correct linebreaks in the subject, so that alone should be a reason to avoid doing these stupid things. And else will be next? HTML mail in the subject? Javascipt? A $%^$ ms-word document? I really think you definately should reconsider doing these things, surely nothing good can come of it. Re: is there software that will do financial options/risk analysis? (opensource) PS: I hope this does not crash people's mail user agents..AAAAAAAAAAAAAA

2001-07-12 Thread Keith G. Murphy
will trillich wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 04:56:44PM +0200, Joost Kooij wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:57:42AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > i must say, that was the best laugh i've had in a looong time. > > (anybody have email brakage from this? my mutt had no >

Re: Well I don't know for sure to be honest, but I certainly don't think it is good manners to put your entire message in the subject of your message. I mean, you could do it of course, and it will probably work, too. But should you? And what will your audience think of it? After all, the subject is really just meant to be an indicator of what's in the actual message. But I couldn't find anything in your message, so I thought I should be writing you about it in this way, so you would best see the point I am trying to make. It is also a lot harder to insert correct linebreaks in the subject, so that alone should be a reason to avoid doing these stupid things. And else will be next? HTML mail in the subject? Javascipt? A $%^$ ms-word document? I really think you definately should reconsider doing these things, surely nothing good can come of it. Re: is there software that will do financial options/risk analysis? (opensource) PS: I hope this does not crash people's mail user agents..AAAAAAAAAAAAAA

2001-07-12 Thread will trillich
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 04:56:44PM +0200, Joost Kooij wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:57:42AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: > > > > > > i must say, that was the best laugh i've had in a looong time. (anybody have email brakage from this? my mutt had no troubles at all...) -- DEBIAN NEWBIE T

Well I don't know for sure to be honest, but I certainly don't think it is good manners to put your entire message in the subject of your message. I mean, you could do it of course, and it will probably work, too. But should you? And what will your audience think of it? After all, the subject is really just meant to be an indicator of what's in the actual message. But I couldn't find anything in your message, so I thought I should be writing you about it in this way, so you would best see the point I am trying to make. It is also a lot harder to insert correct linebreaks in the subject, so that alone should be a reason to avoid doing these stupid things. And else will be next? HTML mail in the subject? Javascipt? A $%^$ ms-word document? I really think you definately should reconsider doing these things, surely nothing good can come of it. Re: is there software that will do financial options/risk analysis? (opensource) PS: I hope this does not crash people's mail user agents..AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA I am sorry if it does.

2001-07-04 Thread Joost Kooij
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:57:42AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Mutt keeps on moving read mail from /var/mail/user

2001-01-22 Thread Daniel de los Reyes
That fixed it, thank you. On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:02:48AM +0100, Remco van de Meent wrote: > Daniel de los Reyes wrote: > > I have set set nomove in my .muttrc , however every mail message that > > I read in /var/mail/dadecal gets moved to $Home/mbox. This is very > > annoying and I understand

Re: Mutt keeps on moving read mail from /var/mail/user

2001-01-22 Thread Remco van de Meent
Daniel de los Reyes wrote: > I have set set nomove in my .muttrc , however every mail message that > I read in /var/mail/dadecal gets moved to $Home/mbox. This is very > annoying and I understand it shouldn't be happening since I set the > nomove setting. How can I get rid of it? > > I attach my .

Mutt keeps on moving read mail from /var/mail/user

2001-01-22 Thread Daniel de los Reyes
I have set set nomove in my .muttrc , however every mail message that I read in /var/mail/dadecal gets moved to $Home/mbox. This is very annoying and I understand it shouldn't be happening since I set the nomove setting. How can I get rid of it? I attach my .muttrc file -- ___

Returned mail: User unknown (fwd)

2000-03-29 Thread Tolga KILICLI
--- Here is what i get! thanx -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:17:27 +0300 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Returned mail: User unknown The original message was received at Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:17:26 +030

Re: /var/spool/mail/user missing

1999-11-24 Thread Mark Wagnon
aving the mail on the server) until I figure this out. > Second, how do you retrieve mail? Does the mail even make it to > /var/spool/mail/$USER? > Normally I use fetchmail and just run it as a daemon. This is a new install, so I just copied the .forward, .fetchmailrc, and procmail rel

Re: /var/spool/mail/user missing

1999-11-23 Thread David S. Jackson
at tests have you run? Is this a first-time configuration, or have you gotten mail to work before? Second, how do you retrieve mail? Does the mail even make it to /var/spool/mail/$USER? Third, can you read mail with other MUA's, such as elm or mailx? In other words, have you decided whether

/var/spool/mail/user missing

1999-11-23 Thread Mark Wagnon
Hi all, I sent a preovious message, but I don't know where it went. It never showed up in Netscape, but then my timezone info is screwed up in netscape (which is why I use mutt). It may show up tonight... Anyway, my problem is: I was trying to set up another box, and when all was done, I couldn'

Re: Limited size spool/mail/user files

1997-02-25 Thread ciccio
Mario Olimpio de Menezes says: > How can I limit the max size of spool/mail/user's files >in order to prevent, e.g., a run of disk space? > Use disk quotas -- Ciccio C. Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Limited size spool/mail/user files

1997-02-25 Thread dpk
I believe this is set in the /etc/smail/config file, you have to modify the line: max_message_size=10M You can find more options in 'man smailconf'. Hope this helps you out. = | dpk|

Limited size spool/mail/user files

1997-02-25 Thread Mario Olimpio de Menezes
Hi, How can I limit the max size of spool/mail/user's files in order to prevent, e.g., a run of disk space? []s, Mario O.de Menezes mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Nuclear and Energetic Research Institute - IPEN-CNEN/SP BRAZIL | | http://tucano.ipen.br