Re: mail headers not set (cf question re tar)

reads for now (for which sorry) and hope that someone can/will supply Gmail specific instructions "how to"; to that end please write an email with 'mail headers' in the subject, thank you. Sorry, I rarely use gmail web UI, in my case "mailto:"; links are handled by

mail headers not set (cf question re tar)

hi, a single reply re the mail headers issue. On Thursday, 22 September 2022 at 09:20:06 UTC+1, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > ... > Your mails lack headers like "In-Reply-To:" or "References:", ... On Thursday, 22 September 2022 at 09:30:05 UTC+1, Tixy wrote: > ... &g

Re: E-mail headers 101 (was: Can't find the DNS Servers)

On Monday 02 October 2017 06:39:00 Reco wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 06:26:08AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 02 October 2017 03:00:28 Reco wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:26:30PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > > > > This is the second time I've tried to send t

Re: E-mail headers 101 (was: Can't find the DNS Servers)

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 06:26:08AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 02 October 2017 03:00:28 Reco wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:26:30PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > > > This is the second time I've tried to send this. The first one just > > > disappeared to the bit bu

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers [Solved]

On 12/06/11 02:38, � wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:20:17 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > >> On 11/06/11 22:04, Camaleón wrote: > > (...) > >>> I also get the black diamond but *only* when I force a utf-8 encoding >>> for the folder it contains the messages and click on "apply default to >>> all

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:20:17 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 11/06/11 22:04, Camaleón wrote: (...) >> I also get the black diamond but *only* when I force a utf-8 encoding >> for the folder it contains the messages and click on "apply default to >> all messages in the folder..." :-) >> >> So.

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 11/06/11 22:04, Camaleón wrote: > El 11/06/11 13:07, Scott Ferguson escribió: >> On 11/06/11 03:57, � "the dark oracle" wrote: >>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:01:36 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: >>> On 11/06/11 01:02, � "the dark oracle" wrote: >>> >> > > I asked you to test this because of t

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

El 11/06/11 13:07, Scott Ferguson escribió: On 11/06/11 03:57, � "the dark oracle" wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:01:36 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: On 11/06/11 01:02, � "the dark oracle" wrote: Scott, let's see if this works: open Icedove and create a new folder (name it "test" or "the

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 11/06/11 03:57, � "the dark oracle" wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:01:36 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > >> On 11/06/11 01:02, � "the dark oracle" wrote: > > > Scott, let's see if this works: open Icedove and create a new folder > (name it "test" or "the dark oracle", at your wish...). The

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:22:13 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Vi, 10 iun 11, 17:57:44, Camaleón wrote: >> >> Sure they tell me. After looking into them in my cache I've seen that >> all those were sent by me using Mutt :-) > > mutt respects your locale, so just make sure you have some UTF-8 loc

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Vi, 10 iun 11, 17:57:44, Camaleón wrote: > > Sure they tell me. After looking into them in my cache I've seen that all > those were sent by me using Mutt :-) mutt respects your locale, so just make sure you have some UTF-8 locale and delete any 'charset' or similar option from your .muttrc

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:01:36 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 11/06/11 01:02, � wrote: >> But how about the fourth of the snapshots? It seems to display the name >> just right. > > Yes - but they're the only ones from you this year that do, which is why > I showed them. Hoping the dates might m

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 11/06/11 01:02, � wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:46:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > >> On 10/06/11 20:46, � wrote: > > (...) > > Wow... I look horrible 8:-) Aw, I dunno - looks classier that the symbol used by the artist formerly know as... ;-p > > But how about the fourth of the snaps

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Jun 10, 2011, at 5:58 AM, Lisi wrote: I presumed it *likely* that you are female, but was uncertain Yes, most of the time on line it is very difficult to be sure. And we have to accept that statistically the majority ... On the internet, nobody knows you're a God... -- Dysl

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:46:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 10/06/11 20:46, � wrote: (...) >>> I'm not convinced - I don't get the problem with other Pan users, >>> though it could be a combination of Pan and gmane. >> >> Yup. Maybe a combo with how Pan encodes and your MUA? >> >> (what puz

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 10/06/11 20:46, � wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:06:18 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > >> On 10/06/11 04:10, � wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:16:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: >>> On 10/06/11 02:01, Camaleón wrote: >>> >>> >>> Eureka! We have found the cul

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:06:18 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 10/06/11 04:10, � wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:16:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: >> >>> On 10/06/11 02:01, Camaleón wrote: >> >> >> Eureka! We have found the culprit! >> >> It seems to be my Pan ne

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 11:03 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Friday 10 June 2011 09:47:43 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > > > I don't > > > know if it's your formal name, a nickname > > > > a nick, she wrote her real name > > Did I? I wonder why? And I wo

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Friday 10 June 2011 10:32:25 Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 10/06/11 18:47, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > >> I don't > >> know if it's your formal name, a nickname > > > > a nick, she wrote her real name several mails before, pardon, I've > > forg

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Friday 10 June 2011 09:47:43 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > > I don't > > know if it's your formal name, a nickname > > a nick, she wrote her real name Did I? I wonder why? And I wonder why I said that it was not my real name? Lisi is what I

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Friday 10 June 2011 09:41:22 Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 10/06/11 08:30, Lisi wrote: > > On Thursday 09 June 2011 19:10:40 Camaleón wrote: > >> that Lisi bloke > > > > I hope that that is a joke Not that I find it funny, but I would > > hate to think that you were serious. :-) > > > > Lisi >

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 10/06/11 18:47, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: >> I don't >> know if it's your formal name, a nickname > > a nick, she wrote her real name several mails before, pardon, I've > forgotten her name, but it's in the archive > > Funnily enough I've

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 10:47 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > > I don't > > know if it's your formal name, a nickname > > a nick, she wrote her real name several mails before, pardon, I've > forgotten her name, but it's in the archive Nonsense

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > I don't > know if it's your formal name, a nickname a nick, she wrote her real name several mails before, pardon, I've forgotten her name, but it's in the archive -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 10/06/11 08:30, Lisi wrote: > On Thursday 09 June 2011 19:10:40 Camaleón wrote: >> that Lisi bloke > > I hope that that is a joke Not that I find it funny, but I would hate to > think that you were serious. :-) > > Lisi > > No no! It was not Camaleón who wrote that. It was me. Self-dep

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 10/06/11 04:10, � wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:16:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > >> On 10/06/11 02:01, Camaleón wrote: > > > Eureka! We have found the culprit! > > It seems to be my Pan newsreader... oh, well, another bug for it >:-) I'm not convinced - I

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 10/06/11 03:30, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 06/09/2011 12:16 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote: > [snip] > > It's definite not Icedove per se, since Camaleón's name has always > rendered correctly for me, even when I used Icedove. > > Bottom line is that something in your box is misconfigured. Agreed. Spe

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Thursday 09 June 2011 19:10:40 Camaleón wrote: > that Lisi bloke I hope that that is a joke Not that I find it funny, but I would hate to think that you were serious. :-) Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:16:12 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 10/06/11 02:01, Camaleón wrote: Eureka! We have found the culprit! It seems to be my Pan newsreader... oh, well, another bug for it >:-) >> I would start thinking about Gmail's webmail. > > Pass - I'm

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 06/09/2011 12:16 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote: [snip] Pass - I'm thinking about changing email clients, just as soon as I can figure out how to keep all my email, and, what's causing the encoding problem. It's definite not Icedove per se, since Camaleón's name has always rendered correctly fo

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 10/06/11 02:01, Camaleón wrote: > El 09/06/11 17:38, Scott Ferguson escribió: >> On 10/06/11 00:16, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > (...) > >>> � >> >>^ That's how Camaleón's name appears as the usually appears as sender >> In this case there's four of them (black diamond with white question >> ma

Re: [OOT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 10/06/11 01:59, Lisi wrote: > On Thursday 09 June 2011 16:38:25 Scott Ferguson wrote: >> but it's consist with >> the From string on the list, and it only affects him. > > I think that "him" should be "her". I'm sure trhat she will correct me if I > am wrong! > > Lisi > > Gee. Thanks. Lis

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 10/06/11 01:00, � - Ralf Mardorf wrote: > And now? > > >From "BlackDiamond - Ralf Mardord" in Icedove. >From "Camaleón - Ralf Mardorf" on the list in Iceweasel:- http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/06/msg00684.html Headers from Icedove:- From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Camale=F3n?= - Ralf Mardorf

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Scott Ferguson wrote: Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:38:25 +1000 From: Scott Ferguson To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility) Resent-Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:39:14 + (UTC) Resent-From

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 10/06/11 00:38, � wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:16:17 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:30 +, Camaleón wrote: From: Ralf Mardorf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encod

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

El 09/06/11 17:38, Scott Ferguson escribió: On 10/06/11 00:16, Ralf Mardorf wrote: (...) � ^ That's how Camaleón's name appears as the usually appears as sender In this case there's four of them (black diamond with white question mark when viewed as plain text UTF8 (my default viewing se

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Thursday 09 June 2011 16:38:25 Scott Ferguson wrote: > but it's consist with > the From string on the list, and it only affects him. I think that "him" should be "her". I'm sure trhat she will correct me if I am wrong! Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On 10/06/11 00:16, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:30 +, Camale�n wrote: >>> From: Ralf Mardorf >>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" >>> Mime-Version: 1.0 >>> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> >> This one looks right. > > > :) >

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

And now? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1307631618.3190.161.camel@debian

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (from debian-user list)

This is the only line in the header in a non human readable style and it's for the source only: From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Camale=F3n?= Evolution translated it to human readable style: From: Camaleón And yes, I send directly to the list, I don't have my own server, if this was meant. Ralf at home -

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:16:17 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:30 +, Camaleón wrote: >> > From: Ralf Mardorf >> > >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 >> > X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 >> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> >> This one looks r

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (from debian-user list)

email from lists that was sent there through gmail, neither do the same trick. > >> >From another poster's headers (all characters translate):- >> >> From: Ralf Mardorf >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" >> Mime-Version: 1.0

Re: [OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:30 +, Camaleón wrote: > > From: Ralf Mardorf > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Mime-Version: 1.0 > > X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > This one looks right. :) For this mail I switched to ISO-8859-15 and I'll a

[OT] Bad characters on e-mail headers (was iceape 1.0.9 and IPv6 compatibility)

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:31:14 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 09/06/11 21:41, � wrote: >> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:26:38 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: >> >>> On 09/06/11 21:07, � wrote: >>> >>> The sender I see ^ is a question mark character - usually a part of >>> Camaleón's name what charact

Re: SOLVED - mail headers with exim4 using ISP smarthost

Oops. Sorry for the noise. On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 06:47:58PM +, Richard Lyons wrote: > I am slightly puzzled by the following headers in mail I send out [...] > co-ho.net, which is resolved by zoneedit. But in place of the domain > name, it says 'config' -- see below. What do I have misc

mail headers with exim4 using ISP smarthost

I am slightly puzzled by the following headers in mail I send out from this home network on DSL via the ISP's smtp server. I think this is something my exim4 is writing, and it looks odd (though it does no obvious harm). The box has hostname scatola and the domain name is co-ho.net, which is reso

Re: thunderbird: howto copy mail headers

Johannes Wiedersich on 18/05/06 10:00, wrote: Martin Hermanowski wrote: On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: `CTRL+U, CTRL+A, CTRL+C' might be what you are looking for. Thanks! That does it. I'm rather sure that it used to work without the CTRL+U in previous

Re: thunderbird: howto copy mail headers

Martin Hermanowski wrote: On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: `CTRL+U, CTRL+A, CTRL+C' might be what you are looking for. Thanks! That does it. I'm rather sure that it used to work without the CTRL+U in previous versions of Mozilla-Mail/Thunderbird. Johann

Re: thunderbird: howto copy mail headers

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > I have recently turned too stupid to be able to select and copy the > headers from emails in order to paste them elsewhere. With the mouse I > can select only a single line of header information at a time, but I > would like

thunderbird: howto copy mail headers

I have recently turned too stupid to be able to select and copy the headers from emails in order to paste them elsewhere. With the mouse I can select only a single line of header information at a time, but I would like to copy the whole message: all headers plus body text. Is this still possib

RE: Exim4 & Mail Headers

> Received: from localhost.localdomain (camax5-065.dialup.optusnet.com.au > [203.164.4.65]) > > What I don't like is the localhost.localdomain bit, but of course I don't > have > a valid domain that I'm sending from, so what is the correct value to have > this set to and where do I set it? There

Exim4 & Mail Headers

Hi all, Just a quick question about exim. I've just finished setting it up with fetchmail->exim->procmail->courier-imap, and I must admit it's working very nice. The only thing is, I'm using the smarthost option to send mail (I'm on dial-up), and in the headers, it has... Received: from localh

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers

Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> No need for that complexity. Just 's'ave the individual mime |> sections. Ah bugger, of course---since even the main text is, strictly speaking, in most cases, an attachment. Thank you!! Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 02:42:39PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 12:45:43PM -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote: > | > | On a related matter, though ... > | > | I switched from Emacs RMAIL to Mutt a couple of months ago, and there > | is just one thing that I miss from RMAI

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers

On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 12:45:43PM -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote: | | On a related matter, though ... | | I switched from Emacs RMAIL to Mutt a couple of months ago, and there | is just one thing that I miss from RMAIL. The command | rmail-output-body-to-file (bound by default to `w') saves only the

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers

On a related matter, though ... I switched from Emacs RMAIL to Mutt a couple of months ago, and there is just one thing that I miss from RMAIL. The command rmail-output-body-to-file (bound by default to `w') saves only the body of the mail-message, eliminating all headers. I often want to do thi

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers?

On Fri, 02 Jul 2004, Jake Johnson wrote: > Hi, I am trying to get rid of the mutt mail headers. I don't like it that > I have to page through so much text just to read the email. Please note > that it is not the verbose headers either. -- Jake Johnson > http://www.plutoid.com

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers?

On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 08:38:03AM -0700, Jake Johnson wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to get rid of the mutt mail headers. I don't like it that I have to > page through so much text just to read the email. Please note that it is not the > verbose headers either. in your .muttrc

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers?

On 2004-07-02, s. keeling penned: > > Very true. Sometimes though, with programs so rich in configuration > options as is mutt, it's nice to see examples of usage of all the > players at once. Last week, I spent some time fiddling with a nugget > I found on Usenet and managed temporarily to royal

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers?

Hello! On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:38:03AM -0600, s. keeling wrote: > Here's another goodie for the OP: > > # Show documentation when pressing F1 > # > macro generic "!zless /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz\n" "Show Mutt > documentation" > macro index"!zless /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.g

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers?

Incoming from Jon Dowland: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:54:19 -0600, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Incoming from Jake Johnson: > > > > > > I am trying to get rid of the mutt mail headers. I don't like it > > > that I hav

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers?

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:54:19 -0600, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Incoming from Jake Johnson: > > > > I am trying to get rid of the mutt mail headers. I don't like it > > that I have to page through so much text just to read the email. > &g

Re: How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers?

Incoming from Jake Johnson: > > I am trying to get rid of the mutt mail headers. I don't like it > that I have to page through so much text just to read the email. > Please note that it is not the verbose headers either. ignore * unhdr_order * unignore \ from: \

How do I get rid of the mutt mail headers?

Hi, I am trying to get rid of the mutt mail headers. I don't like it that I have to page through so much text just to read the email. Please note that it is not the verbose headers either. -- Jake Johnson http://www.plutoid.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: Cleaning up mail headers?

stan wrote: Before I emabrk on a programing excersise to build a fliter to strip off the prior headers before shping the messages on into corporate land, I thought I would ask if there was already a tool to do this? I don't believe there is. Though it almost sounds like it might be a very sim

Re: Cleaning up mail headers?

perl job to me. Send the mails to the debian machine, use a procmail rule to feed them to your perl script, the script sends them on with correct headers. Check out the CPAN modules for working with mail(headers). joost DISCLAIMER This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and may b

Cleaning up mail headers?

I've got a some systems at work that originate mail with munged headers, and this is not going to get fixed. I had solved this problem by having them send email to a Debian machine running exim, that added valid ehaders, and then fowarded these emails on to the corporate mail servers. Well, in th

Re: Grep only mail headers via STDIN?

. > > So I need to write something like > > | condredirect [EMAIL PROTECTED] egrep "^X-Spam-Flag: YES" > > BUT where grep would "exit 1;" and not search any further when it encounters > the first empty line (the end of the mail headers) So you're only f

Re: Grep only mail headers via STDIN?

ep" don't work, they need files to work on, > > but the mail comes via STDIN. > > > > So I need to write something like > > > > | condredirect [EMAIL PROTECTED] egrep "^X-Spam-Flag: YES" > > > > BUT where grep would "

Re: Grep only mail headers via STDIN?

. > > So I need to write something like > > | condredirect [EMAIL PROTECTED] egrep "^X-Spam-Flag: YES" > > BUT where grep would "exit 1;" and not search any further when it encounters > the first empty line (the end of the mail headers) > > > Backg

Re: Grep only mail headers via STDIN?

Joost De Cock wrote: > On Friday 05 March 2004 10:37, Jens Benecke shoved this in my mailbox: >> I want to create a script that greps for a specific mail header coming >> from STDIN. "mailgrep" and "mboxgrep" don't work, they need files to work >> on, but the mail comes via STDIN. > > I'm not say

Re: Grep only mail headers via STDIN?

On Friday 05 March 2004 10:37, Jens Benecke shoved this in my mailbox: > I want to create a script that greps for a specific mail header coming from > STDIN. "mailgrep" and "mboxgrep" don't work, they need files to work on, > but the mail comes via STDIN. I'm not saying this can't be done from a s

Grep only mail headers via STDIN?

am-Flag: YES" BUT where grep would "exit 1;" and not search any further when it encounters the first empty line (the end of the mail headers) Backgroud: I want to filter SPAM but I don't want to filter attached SPAM that people forward to me to analyze. So I can't just gr

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:55:58 +0100, Joerg Rossdeutscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am So, den 11.01.2004 schrieb Wayne Topa um 00:56: > > Joerg Rossdeutscher([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > Am Sa, den 10.01.2004 schrieb Wayne Topa um 19:52: >

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Joer, how can I remove the "Message-Id" generated by Evolution? Do you know how to remove it? Onestly, I have checked the Evolution-Hacker mailing list. The Evolution hackers made available 3 patches to do remove or mangle the headers, but the problem is: 1) you have to download source via CVS. 2

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Hubert, thanks, this could be an idea... I go to verify... ..until now, what I see looking at the e-mails message headers I sent to debian mailing list, is that the headers: "X-Evolution-Source: imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is stil present. Do not care about "X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5", b

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Am So, den 11.01.2004 schrieb Wayne Topa um 00:56: > Joerg Rossdeutscher([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > Am Sa, den 10.01.2004 schrieb Wayne Topa um 19:52: > > > If you remove the Message-Id: you might run into some problems. I > > > have found that a lot of spam 'does not' inclu

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Joerg Rossdeutscher([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Hi, > > Am Sa, den 10.01.2004 schrieb Wayne Topa um 19:52: > > Lorenzo Rossi([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > If you remove the Message-Id: you might run into some prob

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Hi, Am Sa, den 10.01.2004 schrieb Wayne Topa um 19:52: > Lorenzo Rossi([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If you remove the Message-Id: you might run into some problems. I > have found that a lot of spam 'does not' include that header. That wi

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

> "Lorenzo" == Lorenzo Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Lorenzo> I tested the configuration, sending a mail, but: Lorenzo> only the header " X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5" is removed! Lorenzo> I have checked twice the syntax but it seem to be correct. I would think that the X-Evol

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Lorenzo Rossi([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Hi, > > I have a problem with e-mail messages sent from my client. > I use Evolution 1.4 and my own smtp server, Postfix. > When I send an e-mail message, my client add some header, exactly: > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If you

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Thanks for suggestions! I want to remove the header because they give informations about my PC, I do not like this. I have insert the line: "header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks" in my postfix "main.cf". I have crated the file: /etc/postfix/header_checks I tested the configuration,

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Hello dman! On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:38:48AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:38:12AM +0100, Lorenzo Rossi wrote: | Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Don't remove this one. All messages are required to have a globally ..^^

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:38:12AM +0100, Lorenzo Rossi wrote: | Hi, | | I have a problem with e-mail messages sent from my client. | I use Evolution 1.4 and my own smtp server, Postfix. | When I send an e-mail message, my client add some header, exactly: | | Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Don

Remove E-mail Headers

Hi, I have a problem with e-mail messages sent from my client. I use Evolution 1.4 and my own smtp server, Postfix. When I send an e-mail message, my client add some header, exactly: Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 X-Evolution-Source: imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED] I

Re: Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

on Fri, Apr 26, 2002, dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:58:05PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > ... > > | Yes. I thought it was just a glitch with yahoo groups, though. > | Here's a sample: > | > | List-Unsubscribe: > | Date: 26 Apr 2002 10:58:41

Re: Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

on Fri, Apr 26, 2002, dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:15:59AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > | I'm seeing malformed mail headers today. Just ran an apt-get > | dist-upgrade on unstable, not sure if that relates. > | > | I'm seeing the &#

Re: Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

Here are some observations I can make wrt this anomaly : Karsten and Ross see the same effect (on different messages?). Kartsen uses SA for delivery, Ross uses exim. Ross had a replacement From: header added by exim. This means that by the time exim started delivery the headers were already mu

Re: Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 08:15:10PM -0500, dman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:58:05PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > ... > > | Yes. I thought it was just a glitch with yahoo groups, though. > | Here's a sample: > | > | List-Unsubscribe: > | Date: 26 Apr 2002 10:58:41

Re: Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

On Friday 26 April 2002 03:58 pm, Ross Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:15:59AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > I'm seeing malformed mail headers today. Just ran an apt-get > > dist-upgrade on unstable, not sure if that relates. > > > > I'm s

Re: Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:58:05PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: ... | Yes. I thought it was just a glitch with yahoo groups, though. | Here's a sample: | | List-Unsubscribe: | Date: 26 Apr 2002 10:58:41 -From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: [zope

Re: Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

On Friday 26 April 2002 10:15 am, Karsten M. Self wrote: > I'm seeing malformed mail headers today. Just ran an apt-get > dist-upgrade on unstable, not sure if that relates. > > I'm seeing the 'Date' header appended with whatever header follows it > immedi

Re: Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:15:59AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > I'm seeing malformed mail headers today. Just ran an apt-get > dist-upgrade on unstable, not sure if that relates. > > I'm seeing the 'Date' header appended with whatever header follows it >

Re: Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:15:59AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: | I'm seeing malformed mail headers today. Just ran an apt-get | dist-upgrade on unstable, not sure if that relates. | | I'm seeing the 'Date' header appended with whatever header follows it | immediately. I

Re: Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:15:59AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > I'm seeing malformed mail headers today. Just ran an apt-get > dist-upgrade on unstable, not sure if that relates. > > I'm seeing the 'Date' header appended with whatever header follows it >

Malformed mail headers -- missing linefeeds?

I'm seeing malformed mail headers today. Just ran an apt-get dist-upgrade on unstable, not sure if that relates. I'm seeing the 'Date' header appended with whatever header follows it immediately. In this case it's the 'From' header. Missing subject lines are

fragged mail headers? FYI

Today, I received at least 3 pieces from the list that look as if the headers got mangled along the way. I include them without the usual quote indicators so that you can see them "raw." I will "quote" my comments. I still have 146 pieces to go, so I don't know how many more, if any, there are l

Re: Strange E-mail Headers - open relay tests

hi ya tim a good open relay (interactive) test site ( does 72 open relay tests or something like that ) http://www.paladincorp.com.au/unix/spam/spamlart/ have fun alvin http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail ... more open relay tests On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Glyn Millington wrote: > "Tim Grogan" <[EMAIL

Re: Strange E-mail Headers

"Tim Grogan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > I've been paranoid after reading about people relaying through your e-mail > server and spamming other systems. I've tried to lock down my system to > keep that from happening. Today I got 2 email with these headers and I'm > wondering if I

Re: Strange E-mail Headers

On 2002.02.28 03:03 Tim Grogan wrote: Hi all, I've been paranoid after reading about people relaying through your e-mail server and spamming other systems. I've tried to lock down my system to keep that from happening. Today I got 2 email with these headers and I'm wondering if I didn't catch

  1   2   >