On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:17:56AM +0200, Giorgos D. Pallas wrote:
> And why doesn't it first unmount root fs and then disable the LV? I guess
> the answer to this is that root fs is not unmounted but rather remounted
> read-only, so it would fail again... Is that it? (I am relatively new to
> l
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:17:56AM +0200, Giorgos D. Pallas wrote:
> Maximilian Gass wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Giorgos D. Pallas wrote:
>>
>>> I am running debian testing, and I am experiencing lately this
>>> (hopefully) non-destructive problem:
>>>
>> This probl
Maximilian Gass wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Giorgos D. Pallas wrote:
I am running debian testing, and I am experiencing lately this (hopefully)
non-destructive problem:
This problem is non-destructive and normal.
Now, this 'Can't deactivate volume group', always
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Giorgos D. Pallas wrote:
> I am running debian testing, and I am experiencing lately this (hopefully)
> non-destructive problem:
This problem is non-destructive and normal.
> Now, this 'Can't deactivate volume group', always happened, and I guess it
> is
Hello everybody!
I am running debian testing, and I am experiencing lately this
(hopefully) non-destructive problem:
During shutdown I get:
--
Αsking all remaining processes to terminate... done
Killing all remaining processes... failed
...
Deactivating swap... done
Unmounting local
5 matches
Mail list logo