Am 2007-09-24 02:44:13, schrieb Eric d'Alibut:
> On 9/24/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jeez, this has been a bad computer day for me.
>
> > ls listings are just like Steve's.
>
> I'm back to my figment of the imagination idea: this phantom
> dirs-first ls listing is a delusion
On 9/24/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeez, this has been a bad computer day for me.
> ls listings are just like Steve's.
I'm back to my figment of the imagination idea: this phantom
dirs-first ls listing is a delusion produced by too much mc use.
--
No no no, my fish's name is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/07 16:11, s. keeling wrote:
> Eric d'Alibut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On 9/23/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
namely, an 'ls' that sorts directories first, and
ordinary files afterwards? Do others actually see that behav
Eric d'Alibut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 9/23/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > namely, an 'ls' that sorts directories first, and
> > > ordinary files afterwards? Do others actually see that behaviour in
> > > terminals?
>
> > Sure. That's how it works for me.
Not for me. I ge
On 09/23/2007 03:05 PM, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
[...]
Do you have LS_OPTIONS set, or 'ls' aliased?
I apologize for suggesting that aliasing ls to 'ls -X' would give the
behavior you want; it does not (but it comes close).
I've never seen ls sort directory names
On 9/23/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > namely, an 'ls' that sorts directories first, and
> > ordinary files afterwards? Do others actually see that behaviour in
> > terminals?
> Sure. That's how it works for me.
> $ locale
> LANG=
> LANGUAGE=en_US:en_GB:en
> LC_CTYPE="POSIX"
> L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/07 00:49, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
> On 9/22/07, Benjamin A'Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Do 'printenv | grep LC_COLLATE' or 'locale' show the right setting?
>
> I am beginning to think I am a victim of my addled pate. Have I been
> using
On 9/22/07, Benjamin A'Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do 'printenv | grep LC_COLLATE' or 'locale' show the right setting?
I am beginning to think I am a victim of my addled pate. Have I been
using midnight commander too much? Am I looking for a fig newton of my
imagination, namely, an 'ls' that
On 09/22/2007 05:53 PM, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
Last night I installed, and then removed, the ftpd and proftpd debs,
in that order. Now I cannot by hook or crook get 'ls' to behave as it
did before those ftp experiments. 'ls' now sorts strictly by filename
-- including directories -- so that the lat
Eric d'Alibut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Last night I installed, and then removed, the ftpd and proftpd debs,
Glad I don't use 'em.
> in that order. Now I cannot by hook or crook get 'ls' to behave as it
> did before those ftp experiments. 'ls' now sorts strictly by filename
> -- including direct
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 06:53:57PM -0400, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
> Last night I installed, and then removed, the ftpd and proftpd debs,
> in that order. Now I cannot by hook or crook get 'ls' to behave as it
> did before those ftp experiments. 'ls' now sorts strictly by filename
> -- including direct
Last night I installed, and then removed, the ftpd and proftpd debs,
in that order. Now I cannot by hook or crook get 'ls' to behave as it
did before those ftp experiments. 'ls' now sorts strictly by filename
-- including directories -- so that the latter are "mixed in" with
regular files in the ou
The environment variables LANG and LC_COLLATE control sort order and regex
pattern matching expansion.
See files: /etc/environment and possibly /etc/profile (if edited...)
LC_COLLATE is set via LANG (or LANGUAGE) unless overridden via the shell.
Use the command "locale" to see the current values.
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:11:12 -0500, cothrige wrote:
> * Ben Breslauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> T wrote:
>> >Hi
>> >
>> >I am using Debian testing, I read that the ls is able to sort
>> >alphabetically, but mixes uppercase and lowercase together i.e. 'Pearl'
>> >comes before 'pearl' but after
* Ben Breslauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> T wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >I am using Debian testing, I read that the ls is able to sort
> >alphabetically, but mixes uppercase and lowercase together i.e. 'Pearl'
> >comes before 'pearl' but after 'otter'.
> >
> >otter
> >Pearl
> >pearl
> >
> >I want that be
On 2006-10-17 06:11:59 +0400, Rad wrote:
> I think there're unicode.
This is not directly related to Unicode (this also happens with
ISO8859-1), but to a language.
> Try this:
>
> export LC_COLLATE=C
and this will also fix the hyphen-minus problem:
vin:~> printf '%s\n' 1-2 1-3 12 13 | LC_COLLA
I think there're unicode. Try this:
export LC_COLLATE=C
T wrote:
Hi
I am using Debian testing, I read that the ls is able to sort
alphabetically, but mixes uppercase and lowercase together i.e. 'Pearl'
comes before 'pearl' but after 'otter'.
otter
Pearl
pearl
I want that behavior. How can I do that, instead of the traditional order?
I'm using tes
Hi
I am using Debian testing, I read that the ls is able to sort
alphabetically, but mixes uppercase and lowercase together i.e. 'Pearl'
comes before 'pearl' but after 'otter'.
otter
Pearl
pearl
I want that behavior. How can I do that, instead of the traditional order?
thanks
--
Tong (remove
Eric d'Alibut wrote:
On 9/14/06, Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this some utf-8 mutation?
Yup. If you want the old behavior, use this:
export LC_COLLATE=C
Bingo. Thank you sir!
Thank You! I could deal with the case-insensitive sort, but what really
annoyed me was hidden
On 9/14/06, Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this some utf-8 mutation?
Yup. If you want the old behavior, use this:
export LC_COLLATE=C
Bingo. Thank you sir!
--
No no no, my fish's name is Eric, Eric the fish. He's an halibut. I am
not a looney! Why should I be tarred with the
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:01:25PM -0400, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
> I just noticed on a brand new install of testing that ls has begun to
> sort alphabetically, but mixes uppercase and lowercase together i.e.
> 'Pearl' comes before 'pearl' but after 'otter'.
[...]
> A stable Debian version I maintain
I just noticed on a brand new install of testing that ls has begun to
sort alphabetically, but mixes uppercase and lowercase together i.e.
'Pearl' comes before 'pearl' but after 'otter'.
otter
Pearl
pearl
A stable Debian version I maintain behaves the good old-fashioned way:
Pearl
otter
pearl
>
> What about "ls -d */" ?
>
ls -d .*/ */for hidden directories
Hello fellows,
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:06:50PM +, andrej hocevar wrote:
> hi jesper,
...
> written. my beginner's try was simply "ls | grep "/"" which gives
> the right result. but how do i make it print the result in columns?
What about "ls -d */" ?
>
> andrej
Cheers,
--
Serafim Zani
[ I missed the original, but here's some comments anyways ]
| On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 12:58:56PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
| > * On Sun Oct 14, Daniel Jones wrote:
| > >
| > > I'm going to feel silly if this is as easy as it seems like
| > > it should be but after poring over the man pages I
hi jesper,
your reply -- and even more the question you were replying to --
made me curious. i wanted to try it out. even though your command
works i wanted to define it myself from scratch -- because it's a
good way to learn and second because i don't understand all you've
written. my beginner's t
Hi Daniel,
I don't think this is possible with the the ls options. I use a function
specified in my /etc/profile:
ll () {
ls -l --color=always "$@"|grep ^d |cat
ls -l --color=always "$@"|egrep -v "^d|total\ [0-9]" |cat
}
This works like ls -l, but first gives directories, then other files.
I'm going to feel silly if this is as easy as it seems like
it should be but after poring over the man pages I can't
figure it out.
Is it possible to have "ls" display contents with
directories listed first, sorted alphabetically, then all
other files, also sorted alphabetically? None of the sort
29 matches
Mail list logo
