On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:44:41PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
> alias lsd='ls -d */'
> NOTE: This has nothing to do the the Opium Thread!!
I was thinking about sensible aliases, and I came to the same conclusion
:-)
--
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Lynn W([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I know this must be a silly question, but I have tried looking at the man and the
> --help and could not find it:
>
> How does one use the ls command to display just the directories' names, and suppress
> those which are not directories? In M
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:32, Lynn W wrote:
> I know this must be a silly question, but I have tried looking at the man and the
> --help and could not find it:
>
> How does one use the ls command to display just the directories' names, and suppress
> those which are not directories? In MS-DOS, it
"Lynn W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, but how do I use
> find -maxdepth 1 -type d
> to just display the directories in the current directory, and not to
> recurse into subdirectories, *and* to display all the directories'
> permissions?
I'd chant something like
find . -name . -o -
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:38:21AM -0600, Lynn W wrote:
> Thanks, but how do I use
> find -maxdepth 1 -type d
> to just display the directories in the current directory, and not to recurse
> into subdirectories, *and* to display all the directories' permissions?
find -maxdepth 1 -type d -exec
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:38:21AM -0600, Lynn W wrote:
> Thanks, but how do I use
> find -maxdepth 1 -type d
> to just display the directories in the current directory, and not to recurse into
> subdirectories, *and* to display all the directories' permissions?
Okay, I'm just taking a quick
Thanks, but how do I use
find -maxdepth 1 -type d
to just display the directories in the current directory, and not to recurse into
subdirectories, *and* to display all the directories' permissions?
Thanks very much!
Lynn
>
>I use "find -type f" for that.
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:04:16AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 at 16:41 GMT, Tom penned:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:32:27AM -0600, Lynn W wrote:
> >> I know this must be a silly question, but I have tried looking at the
> >> man and the --help and could not find it:
>
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 at 16:41 GMT, Tom penned:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:32:27AM -0600, Lynn W wrote:
>> I know this must be a silly question, but I have tried looking at the
>> man and the --help and could not find it:
>>
>> How does one use the ls command to display just the directories'
>> na
Why do you not use `find' ?
Lynn W wrote:
I know this must be a silly question, but I have tried looking at the man and the --help and could not find it:
How does one use the ls command to display just the directories' names, and suppress those which are not directories? In MS-DOS, it was dir /ad
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:32:27AM -0600, Lynn W wrote:
> I know this must be a silly question, but I have tried looking at the man and the
> --help and could not find it:
>
> How does one use the ls command to display just the directories' names, and suppress
> those which are not directories?
I know this must be a silly question, but I have tried looking at the man and the
--help and could not find it:
How does one use the ls command to display just the directories' names, and suppress
those which are not directories? In MS-DOS, it was dir /ad
Doing ls -ld * does not do it as it onl
12 matches
Mail list logo
