On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> But that still doesn't solve the problem of viewing the Unix print
> queue from within Windows. That works with regular lpr, but not lprng.
i had no problems with the print queue when i used it on my system. this
was with win95, not win3 if that makes a
But that still doesn't solve the problem of viewing the Unix print queue
from within Windows. That works with regular lpr, but not lprng.
On Mar 5, Craig Sanders wrote:
> but that's not necessary at all. with samba, printers listed in
> /etc/printcap appear on the Win3/Win95/etc machines prin
> "Nils" == Nils Rennebarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nils> On Tue, 4 Mar 1997, Craig Sanders wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
>>> lprng has removed the possibility to automatically remove Files
>>> after printing. This is however necessary to remove spooled
>>> jobs
On Tue, 4 Mar 1997, Craig Sanders wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
>> lprng has removed the possibility to automatically remove Files after
>> printing. This is however necessary to remove spooled jobs. How do you
>> work around this problem?
>I'm not sure what you mean. Files in
On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > actually, it's completely untrue. samba works very well with lprng.
>
> lprng has removed the possibility to automatically remove Files after
> printing. This is however necessary to remove spooled jobs. How
On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> I had tried the first item you suggested before reverting back to normal
> lpr, I do recall. I also seem to remember that in some of Samba's
> documentation, the lprng option was mentioned, while in other areas where
> the options for printing were listed
Adrian Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A suggestion for people using Lprng and having problems is to check
> out the Lprng mailing list (10-20 messages a day - see the doc
> dir. for info). I joined a few weeks ago and they have covered this
> problem (Samba) and many others; and Patrick Po
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > On Mar 03, 1997 at 08:58:41PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > well, actually i had a few initial hassles getting the win95 box
> > > to print with the PCL driver. Postscript worked fine (through
> > > gh
Scott Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anyone tell me what the differences are between lpr and lprng. In
> what ways has lprng been ``enhanced and extended'', to quote the package
> description.
Read /usr/doc/lprng/Intro.txt.gz and others.
Sven
--
Sven Rudolph <[EMAIL PROTEC
William Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > This is *not* an acceptable fix. Other packages, for isntance Samba, will
> > **NOT** work with lprng.
> >
> Doesn't getting rid of name canonizing in lpr work? Just get the source of
> an older version of
On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Craig Sanders wrote:
>actually, it's completely untrue. samba works very well with lprng.
lprng has removed the possibility to automatically remove Files after
printing. This is however necessary to remove spooled jobs. How do you work
around this problem?
Nils
--
\
I had tried the first item you suggested before reverting back to normal
lpr, I do recall. I also seem to remember that in some of Samba's
documentation, the lprng option was mentioned, while in other areas where
the options for printing were listed, lprng was not mentioned.
I do not recall if I
> "John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> John Goerzen writes: > This is *not* an acceptable fix. Other
>> packages, for isntance Samba, will > **NOT** work with lprng.
>>
>> Why won't samba not work with it? Please file an appropriate
>> bug against the sam
On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mar 03, 1997 at 08:58:41PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > well, actually i had a few initial hassles getting the win95 box
> > to print with the PCL driver. Postscript worked fine (through
> > ghostscript to my HP4L), but PCL failed. Eventually some
On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> > i've got it running on my system, using lprng & magicfilter with .
> > samba no problems. it works.
>
> Not in my experience. I also tried lprng, magicfilter, and samba. I
> found the same "nonprintable" option
On Mar 2, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, Scott Stanley wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> >
> > > This is *not* an acceptable fix. Other packages, for isntance Samba,
> > > will **NOT** work with lprng.
> >
> > This is nice to know
>
> actually, it's compl
On Mar 03, 1997 at 08:58:41PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> well, actually i had a few initial hassles getting the win95 box to
> print with the PCL driver. Postscript worked fine (through ghostscript
> to my HP4L), but PCL failed. Eventually somebody on debian-user
> suggested that I put "check_fo
On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, Scott Stanley wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > This is *not* an acceptable fix. Other packages, for isntance Samba,
> > will **NOT** work with lprng.
>
> This is nice to know
actually, it's completely untrue. samba works very well with lprng.
i'v
> John Goerzen writes:
> > This is *not* an acceptable fix. Other packages, for isntance Samba, will
> > **NOT** work with lprng.
>
> Why won't samba not work with it? Please file an appropriate bug against
> the samba package.
Because Samba depends on the output formats of the lp* commands, in
John Goerzen writes:
> This is *not* an acceptable fix. Other packages, for isntance Samba, will
> **NOT** work with lprng.
Why won't samba not work with it? Please file an appropriate bug against
the samba package.
Regards
Joey
--
/ Martin Schulze * Debian Linux Maintainer * [
On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> This is *not* an acceptable fix. Other packages, for isntance Samba, will
> **NOT** work with lprng.
>
This is nice to know Sounds like the thing to do is work on lpr to
get it working. Besides, I am running into as many problems getting
lprng
On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> This is *not* an acceptable fix. Other packages, for isntance Samba, will
> **NOT** work with lprng.
>
Doesn't getting rid of name canonizing in lpr work? Just get the source of
an older version of lpr or unpatch the current sources or get an older lp
This is *not* an acceptable fix. Other packages, for isntance Samba, will
**NOT** work with lprng.
> On Wed, 26 Feb 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Much Deleted.
>
> >
> > The real fix seems to go to lprng. That's the official position of the
> > maintainer as well, as stated in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Yes. The suggestion is wrong, the suggestion is just a hack. The
> problem is due to an incoherence between lprm/lpr/lpd. I sent a patch
> for this last year, I think it was applied but it may have been
> dropped. I haven't followed lpr*.deb since, because for me it's
>
Scott Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > The real fix seems to go to lprng. That's the official position of the
> > maintainer as well, as stated in a msg. to this list last year. I'll
> > do it as soon as I have a chance.
> >
>
> If the recommended fix (by the package maintainer even)
Philippe Troin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 26 February 1997 09:34:
>> lprm can't regonize that the user "spiegl" is a local user because of
>> a problem with your hostname in /etc/hostname and /etc/hosts.
>>
>> If /etc/hostname looks like
>> your_hostname
>>
>> then your /etc/hosts fi
On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Philippe Troin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 1997 15:13:58 +0100 Andreas Nowack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
> achen.de) wrote:
>
> > lprm can't regonize that the user "spiegl" is a local user because of
> > a problem with your hostname in /etc/hostname and /etc/hosts.
> >
> > If /etc/ho
On Wed, 26 Feb 1997 15:13:58 +0100 Andreas Nowack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
achen.de) wrote:
> lprm can't regonize that the user "spiegl" is a local user because of
> a problem with your hostname in /etc/hostname and /etc/hosts.
>
> If /etc/hostname looks like
> your_hostname
>
> then your /etc/
On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >
> >Hi!
> >
> >something must be wrong with my lpd-setup. When a user starts
> >a print job, s/he can't cancel it anymore. Example: (user 'spiegl')
> >
> > $ lpr abc.txt
> > $ lpq
> > lp is ready and printing
> > Rank Owner Job Files
>
>Hi!
>
>something must be wrong with my lpd-setup. When a user starts
>a print job, s/he can't cancel it anymore. Example: (user 'spiegl')
>
> $ lpr abc.txt
> $ lpq
> lp is ready and printing
> Rank Owner Job Files Total Size
> active spiegl 27 abc.
30 matches
Mail list logo
