Re: loopback routing - just curious

2000-02-23 Thread Mirek Kwasniak
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 03:42:19AM +0800, da Bobstopper wrote: > hiya, i've noticed that > > route add -net 127.0.0.0 > > doesn't seem to work anymore and, even more curiously, doesn't seem to be > needed. i can still ping 127.0.0.1 but the 127.0.0.0 route isn't evident in > my route -n output.

Re: loopback routing - just curious

2000-02-22 Thread James Sasitorn
the 2.2 series kernel implicitly creates the network config (in comparison to the manual creation you have to do in 2.0) james On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, da Bobstopper wrote: > hiya, i've noticed that > > route add -net 127.0.0.0 > > doesn't seem to work anymore and, even more curiously, doesn't se

loopback routing - just curious

2000-02-22 Thread da Bobstopper
hiya, i've noticed that route add -net 127.0.0.0 doesn't seem to work anymore and, even more curiously, doesn't seem to be needed. i can still ping 127.0.0.1 but the 127.0.0.0 route isn't evident in my route -n output. i gather that this is kernel related, not debian related since it only happe