On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:42:38AM +0200, Pim Bliek wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:32:04 +1200, Richard Hector
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:35:57PM +0200, Pim Bliek wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I am no regular expression guru, and I am having severe difficultie
Thanx!
It was too late yesterday LOL. Off course it was smtpd ;). Also, I was
not aware of the extra rules in /etc/logcheck/violations.d! Stupid,
but I did not think of it. I commented out "failed" there and now it
doesn't show anymore! Now let's hope there are no other serious things
with "failed
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:35:57PM +0200, Pim Bliek wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am no regular expression guru, and I am having severe difficulties
> adjusting logcheck to my needs (on a Sid system).
>
> I get the following stuff mailed by logcheck from my syslog which I
> don't want to see:
> Sep 29 2
Hi All,
I am no regular expression guru, and I am having severe difficulties
adjusting logcheck to my needs (on a Sid system).
I get the following stuff mailed by logcheck from my syslog which I
don't want to see:
Sep 29 23:02:02 srv1 postfix/smtpd[29293]: _sasl_plugin_load failed on
sasl_auxprop
4 matches
Mail list logo
