lm_sensors coretemp-isa-0000 values below ambient temp

Hi, I am trying to setup lm_sensors for an older Zotac IONITX-U-E mainboard. The values I get from the w83667hg-isa-0a10 are all looking good and are in line with what I see in the BIOS. But the values I get from coretemp-isa- are way off. They are around +9/+10°C for both cores while the

lm_sensors log

Bonjour, After the last upgrade of my debien sid, lm_sensors reports in logwatch (first time I see that! I didn't change anything in my config). Here is the last report: - lm_sensors output Begin acpitz-virtual-0 Adapter: Virtual device

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

Patrick Zaloum wrote: Final Thought - Addendum to step 6... DO remove lm-sensors package, or change the Makefile to install to /usr. It will otherwise install to /usr/local and you will have duplicates. On Feb 12, 2008 11:26 PM, Patrick Zaloum <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wr

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

Final Thought - Addendum to step 6... DO remove lm-sensors package, or change the Makefile to install to /usr. It will otherwise install to /usr/local and you will have duplicates. On Feb 12, 2008 11:26 PM, Patrick Zaloum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Problem SOLVED! > So for anyone using a new mo

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

Problem SOLVED! So for anyone using a new motherboard with Etch facing the same error many people were: FATAL: Error inserting w83627ehf (/lib/modules/2.6.18-6-686/kernel/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.ko): No such device The steps i took to successfully get it to work: 1. Upgrade to kernel 2.6.22 fro

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:00:24 -0500 "Patrick Zaloum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually that's precicely what I just did, i'm running 2.6.22-3 from > backports now, but so far i'm not any better for trying. Now when i run > sensors i get the following error: > > > w83627dhg-i2c-9191-290 > ERR

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

Actually that's precicely what I just did, i'm running 2.6.22-3 from backports now, but so far i'm not any better for trying. Now when i run sensors i get the following error: w83627dhg-i2c-9191-290 ERROR: Can't get adapter or algorithm?!? So new question: What do i do now? :/ On Feb 12, 2

Re: lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 08:21:26PM -0500, Patrick Zaloum wrote: > I have a modern motherboard (Asus p5kc) running Etch-r2. I know it has the > devices necessary to provide sensor data but the kernel version that etch is > built on (2.6.18) is not recent enough for the required module (w83627ehf) >

lm_sensors does not support my board with w83627ehf

I have a modern motherboard (Asus p5kc) running Etch-r2. I know it has the devices necessary to provide sensor data but the kernel version that etch is built on (2.6.18) is not recent enough for the required module (w83627ehf) to support it: # modprobe w83627ehf FATAL: Error inserting w83627ehf (/

Re: lm_sensors shows wrong values

I am having the same problem that you have/had. I have 127C for all of my temp values and can't find the error. By any chance have you figured anything out? Thanks, Shawn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

Lubos Vrbka wrote: > > #cut here > # I2C adapter drivers > i2c-i801 > # I2C chip drivers > # no driver for Smart Battery Charger yet > #cut here It seems your card is not supported by lm-sensors. Check http://www.lm-sensors.nu, specifically the supported devices sect

Re: lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

dules you need to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. You need to have i2c and lm_sensors installed before running this program. Also, you need to be `root', or at least have access to the /dev/i2c-* files, for most things. If you have patched your kernel and have some drivers built i

Re: lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

Lubos Vrbka wrote: > Felipe Sateler wrote: >> This happens on my system when I unload w83627hf (which is the module I >> need for my chipset). Have you loaded the modules sensors-detect said you >> should load? Adding the lines in /etc/modules doesn't automatically load >> them (actually, yes, the

Re: lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

Felipe Sateler wrote: This happens on my system when I unload w83627hf (which is the module I need for my chipset). Have you loaded the modules sensors-detect said you should load? Adding the lines in /etc/modules doesn't automatically load them (actually, yes, they are loaded automatically, but

Re: lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

Lubos Vrbka wrote: > $ sensors > Can't access procfs/sysfs file > Unable to find i2c bus information; > For 2.6 kernels, make sure you have mounted sysfs and libsensors > was compiled with sysfs support! > For older kernels, make sure you have done 'modprobe i2c-proc'! This happens on my system w

lm_sensors procfs/sysfs problem

hi guys, there has recently been a discussion on amd64 list about the lm_sensors. when trying it on my i386 box i seem to have the same problem, however solution was not given on amd64. maybe someone can provide me with some hints? $ sensors Can't access procfs/sysfs file Unable to fin

Re: lm_sensors in 2.6.12

phyrster on 31/07/05 11:45, wrote: On 19:38 Sat 30 Jul 2005, Adam Hardy wrote: When I installed the new kernel with the debian package, I configured it with make xconfig, but I didn't see any choices for i2c_i801 in the i2c section. Now I see it, but it is greyed out and I cannot select it.

Re: lm_sensors

On 19:38 Sat 30 Jul 2005, Adam Hardy wrote: > When I installed the new kernel with the debian package, I configured it > with make xconfig, but I didn't see any choices for i2c_i801 in the i2c > section. Now I see it, but it is greyed out and I cannot select it. Not sure what's wrong. try 'make

programming the lm_sensors daemon

Hi, Has anybody had any experiences programming the lm_sensors daemon? It allows you to read the disk temps via a port. They have an example of it in their contrib section "crash.c". That works OK but after a while connect complains that the filedescriptor is bad. Leaves me at a

lm_sensors

I upgraded my kernel to 2.6.12 last week and during rebooting, I saw an error saying: lm_sensors Module i2c_i801 not found or something similar - I cannot find any boot log now. So my gKrellM monitor can't show any CPU temperature. When I installed the new kernel with the debian packa

Re: Missing Modules for lm_sensors, where do they come from?

Chris, I didn't include any more information as I was not expecting any more help at that time. But thanks anyway. I have followed the links you gave me and I think I understand how it all fits together now , and I of course found the it87.c source file too. At the moment I have an unresolved s

Re: Missing Modules for lm_sensors, where do they come from?

On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 11:50:21 +0200 Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chris, > thanks for your answer, I spent most of yesterday googling and looking > at the lm-sensors website. I found various module packages, but never > did actually find one for my Kernel, but I also never ever found > anythi

Re: Missing Modules for lm_sensors, where do they come from?

looking for. Cheers Brian Chris Metzler wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2004 21:41:32 +0200 Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am currently trying to get lm_sensors installed. Sensors-detect seemed to go OK. In fact all seems to be going OK until the IT87 modules should be loaded. There I get "modul

Re: Missing Modules for lm_sensors, where do they come from?

On Mon, 31 May 2004 21:41:32 +0200 Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > I am currently trying to get lm_sensors installed. Sensors-detect seemed > to go OK. In fact all seems to be going OK until the IT87 modules should > be loaded. There I get "module not found&qu

Missing Modules for lm_sensors, where do they come from?

Hi, I am currently trying to get lm_sensors installed. Sensors-detect seemed to go OK. In fact all seems to be going OK until the IT87 modules should be loaded. There I get "module not found". And sure enough the module is not there. Reading much of the lm_sensors stuff did not tel

Re: Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 05:05:27AM +, Pigeon wrote: > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote: > > > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case, > > > where there isn't a convenient comma

Re: Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 07:52:18PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > 3) get the woody backport of X4.2 from >http://people.debian.org/~blade/woody/ :) Nah, just looked there. His is the testing version (4.2.1), I have 4.2.0. But thanks anyway. Pigeon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lm_sensors

...snip... Thanks to all and George,David,Jsen and Hugo Let me explain somewhat better what's my pb: My MB is a ASUS P4T533-R with an ASB100 - Bach chip ( w83781d ??) And have kernels 2.4.20-bf24, 2.4.18-bf24, 2.4.686 and my own 2.4.20 installed. Yes by old-way I mean bzImage, etc... ( all manu

Re: Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote: > > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case, > > where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg. > > > > My particular case is X 4.2.0, which

Re: Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote: > > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case, > > where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg. > > > > My particular case is X 4.2.0, which

Re: Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote: > It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case, > where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg. > > My particular case is X 4.2.0, which I downloaded the source of and > compiled for slink, then for woody when I

Re: lm_sensors

George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since you (mess-mate) probably have your own reasons and desires to > continue to use your own kernel, another alternative is to make a > 'dummy' deb info entry. The 'equivs' package can do this. But, really, there are better options. Foremost is us

Packaging system and non-Debian packages [was: Re: lm_sensors]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:01:25PM -0700, Hugo Graumann wrote: > * On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:00:17AM +0100, mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Sorry, this error messages appaers on the install of this i2c package : > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of i2c-2.4.20: > > i2c-2

Re: lm_sensors

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:42:38AM +0800, Jsen wrote: >* Hugo Graumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> * On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:00:17AM +0100, mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> > Sorry, this error messages appaers on the install of this i2c package : >> > dpkg: dependency problems prevent

Re: lm_sensors

, 2003 at 02:19:45PM -0500, karrottop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > | > > > | > I am re-posting this because I was made aware I sent it as a reply to > > | > another post. Sorry about that, so without further adue here is my > > | > intended post now... > &g

Re: lm_sensors

| > I am re-posting this because I was made aware I sent it as a reply to > | > another post. Sorry about that, so without further adue here is my > | > intended post now... > | > > | > > | > I am having a great deal of trouble getting lm_sensors to work under

Re: lm_sensors

without further adue here is my | > intended post now... | > | > | > I am having a great deal of trouble getting lm_sensors to work under | > debian. I am pretty sure that I am about 75% on the way to getting this | > started but none the less, if someone could give me a bit

Re: lm_sensors

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:42:11AM -0700, Hugo Graumann wrote: > > Got hardware sensors working on a few motherboards here and even > took notes on how it was done. Perhaps these notes might be useful to you. Thanks Hugo! Johann -- Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036 Informasietegnolog

Re: lm_sensors

bout that, so without further adue here is my > > intended post now... > > > > > > I am having a great deal of trouble getting lm_sensors to work under > > debian. I am pretty sure that I am about 75% on the way to getting this > > started but none the less

Re: lm_sensors

great deal of trouble getting lm_sensors to work under > debian. I am pretty sure that I am about 75% on the way to getting this > started but none the less, if someone could give me a bit of a > walk-through to getting things running I would appreciate it. My > intention is mostly to moni

lm_sensors

I am re-posting this because I was made aware I sent it as a reply to another post. Sorry about that, so without further adue here is my intended post now... I am having a great deal of trouble getting lm_sensors to work under debian. I am pretty sure that I am about 75% on the way to getting

Re: lm_sensors

karrottop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Although I am sure I have about 75% of what I need to do complete, could > somebody give me a walkthrough of getting lm-sensors up and running on > debian? The goal being getting some sort of information with the > command sensors or with gkrellm's sensor pl

lm_sensors

Although I am sure I have about 75% of what I need to do complete, could somebody give me a walkthrough of getting lm-sensors up and running on debian? The goal being getting some sort of information with the command sensors or with gkrellm's sensor plugin, thanksif it matters I am using kerne

Re: i2c and lm_sensors

karrottop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am trying to get im_sensors running on my debian box, but I am getting > some opposition. First of all, I do have my kernel source, and it is > symlinked to /usr/src/linux. but for some reason when I go to where i2c > installed from apt get /usr/src/modu

Re: i2c and lm_sensors

hi ya usually... ( at least for me ) its easiest to d/l the latest/greatest lmsensors package and build it separate from the kernel http://www.Linux-1U.net/LCD/lm_sensors.Txt/i2c.uHowTo.txt c ya alvin On 1 Feb 2003, karrottop wrote: > I am trying to get im_sensors running on my debian box, b

i2c and lm_sensors

I am trying to get im_sensors running on my debian box, but I am getting some opposition. First of all, I do have my kernel source, and it is symlinked to /usr/src/linux. but for some reason when I go to where i2c installed from apt get /usr/src/modules/i2c (or something to that effect) and then

Re: lm_sensors

Mirek Dobsicek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've just recompiled kernel 2.4.18 a inserted all i2c* as modules. > Then installed lm_sensors deb package. > It wants i2c-viapro (my mother board is MSI Turbo with this chip) > but this module is not in kernel tree. Where can

lm_sensors

Good evening, I've just recompiled kernel 2.4.18 a inserted all i2c* as modules. Then installed lm_sensors deb package. It wants i2c-viapro (my mother board is MSI Turbo with this chip) but this module is not in kernel tree. Where can I get it a and how to compile and install? I'm run

Re: lm_sensors with 2.4.9

ble i2c in the main kernel build. RB> RB> I'm not sure what you mean by the phrase "outside the kernel". RB> If you use kernel-package it's all set up to build kernel modules RB> pretty automatically. JM> JM> With outside the kernel, I mean recompilin

Re: lm_sensors with 2.4.9

what you mean by the phrase "outside the kernel". If you use > kernel-package it's all set up to build kernel modules pretty automatically. With outside the kernel, I mean recompiling all "extensions" (i.e. i2c and lm_sensors) as modules, but without patching the kernel

Re: lm_sensors with 2.4.9

x27;s all set up to build kernel modules pretty automatically. At 09:57 AM 9/12/01 +0200, you wrote: Hi all, I want to compile lm_sensors. I'm using kernel 2.4.9 on woody. I've got my kernel and disable its i2c and bttv support. Why? Oh, they say that i2c is needed to be updated, a

Re: lm_sensors with 2.4.9

Julio Merino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JM> I want to compile lm_sensors. I'm using kernel 2.4.9 on woody. JM> JM> I've got my kernel and disable its i2c and bttv support. Why? Oh, they JM> say that i2c is needed to be updated, and I guess that bttv should also J

Re: lm_sensors with 2.4.9

Julio Merino wrote: > > Hi all, > > I want to compile lm_sensors. I'm using kernel 2.4.9 on woody. > > I've got my kernel and disable its i2c and bttv support. Why? Oh, they > say that i2c is needed to be updated, and I guess that bttv should also > be up

lm_sensors: first problem compiling kernel

Hi all, Here it comes my first problem... I've unpacked a freshly kernel-2.4.9 sources on /usr/src, and copied my old configuration there (.config). I've run make menuconfig and deselected the bttv drivers and i2c. (I've reviewed all the configuration and seems ok). So, I run: make-kpkg c

lm_sensors with 2.4.9

Hi all, I want to compile lm_sensors. I'm using kernel 2.4.9 on woody. I've got my kernel and disable its i2c and bttv support. Why? Oh, they say that i2c is needed to be updated, and I guess that bttv should also be updated... So, I've got the i2c package and I'm goin

Re: lm_sensors temp readings only 8C

On Thursday 17 May 2001 09:16, mikepolniak wrote: > Just installed lm_sensors for via-pro chipset VT82c596 and ran sensors: > > max1617-i2c-0-18 > Adapter: SMBus vt82c596 adapter at 5000 > Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter > temp: +8.0°C (min = +4°C, max = +0°C) > >

lm_sensors temp readings only 8C

Just installed lm_sensors for via-pro chipset VT82c596 and ran sensors: max1617-i2c-0-18 Adapter: SMBus vt82c596 adapter at 5000 Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter temp: +8.0°C (min = +4°C, max = +0°C) In /proc/sys/dev/sensors/max1617-i2c-0-18 i get: temp1 0 4 8 temp2 60 8 0 How do

Re: lm_sensors and ABit KT7A

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Damon Muller wrote: > Hi folks, > > I recently upgraded up system from a K6-2 350, to a K7 900, running on > an ABit KT7A Motherboard. This is all well and good and works fine and > is very stable... > > Anyway, I was reading recently about using

lm_sensors and ABit KT7A

Hi folks, I recently upgraded up system from a K6-2 350, to a K7 900, running on an ABit KT7A Motherboard. This is all well and good and works fine and is very stable... Anyway, I was reading recently about using lm_sensors to display things like the CPU temperature and stuff. So I decided to go

Re: Q: Where lm_sensors to compile?

> you don't to recompile your kernel, as long as you've the kernel > sources of the kernel you're running (same version) and the .config of > your kernel (for debian kernels, /boot/config-2.2.x) Oh great. Yes, I do. I just recompiled my kernel this morning because I found out ppp worked better as

Re: Q: Where lm_sensors to compile?

On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:06:02PM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: > > > > BTW: don't you need i2c too, for this work? i2c-source is a separate > > That was a good exhaustive intro, thanks. Save me hours and I have > adirection. I just don't know now if it's worth it. Others compiling in > this optio

Re: Q: Where lm_sensors to compile?

> > BTW: don't you need i2c too, for this work? i2c-source is a separate That was a good exhaustive intro, thanks. Save me hours and I have adirection. I just don't know now if it's worth it. Others compiling in this option? Does GKrellm track it? Anything else? If it's a module, do I have to re

Re: Q: Where lm_sensors to compile?

On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:04:55AM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: > > apt-get install lm-sensors-source > > > > can be builded thru kernel-package, read kernel-package docs for more > > info. > > Oh, thanks. I'll read up, but what am I looking for. What's the general > procedure... Like add the new

Re: Q: Where lm_sensors to compile?

> apt-get install lm-sensors-source > > can be builded thru kernel-package, read kernel-package docs for more > info. Oh, thanks. I'll read up, but what am I looking for. What's the general procedure... Like add the new packge to the kernel package, usre an include? Or you know what doc offhand?

Re: Q: Where lm_sensors to compile?

On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 10:31:43AM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: > Hi, > > I want to compile in lm_sensors for Gkrellm but can(t find a reference > to them in make xconfig... Are theya patch or buried deep within an > option? apt-get install lm-sensors-source can be builded thru

Q: Where lm_sensors to compile?

Hi, I want to compile in lm_sensors for Gkrellm but can(t find a reference to them in make xconfig... Are theya patch or buried deep within an option? Thanks, Jonathan -- "Hey, I think I finally got the hang of i-"