Re: "lists.debian.org - where can you help?" (Video)

On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 13:49:04 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I wanted to respond with something like > . The link in the bot in #debian is . There may of course be others.

Re: "lists.debian.org - where can you help?" (Video)

On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 1:22 PM Andy Smith wrote: > > Perhaps not quite on topic but over the holiday period I watched this > presentation about lists.debian.org and found it very interesting. > > > https://berlin2024.mini.debconf.org/talks/12-listsdebianorg-where-can-you-h

"lists.debian.org - where can you help?" (Video)

Hi, Perhaps not quite on topic but over the holiday period I watched this presentation about lists.debian.org and found it very interesting. https://berlin2024.mini.debconf.org/talks/12-listsdebianorg-where-can-you-help/ Or if you prefer YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v

Re: https://lists.debian.org/ port 443 unreachable

On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 01:35:14PM +0200, Marco wrote: > Am 03.09.2023 um 10:06:15 Uhr schrieb Michael Kjörling: > > > On 3 Sep 2023 10:02 +0200, from m...@dorfdsl.de (Marco): > > > Currently it seems that the mailing list management software isn't > > > reachable via HTTPS port 443 or 80, I get a

Re: https://lists.debian.org/ port 443 unreachable

Am 03.09.2023 um 10:06:15 Uhr schrieb Michael Kjörling: > On 3 Sep 2023 10:02 +0200, from m...@dorfdsl.de (Marco): > > Currently it seems that the mailing list management software isn't > > reachable via HTTPS port 443 or 80, I get a timeout. Port 25 is > > reachable. > > Worked fine for me at

Re: https://lists.debian.org/ port 443 unreachable

On 3 Sep 2023 10:02 +0200, from m...@dorfdsl.de (Marco): > Currently it seems that the mailing list management software isn't > reachable via HTTPS port 443 or 80, I get a timeout. Port 25 is > reachable. Worked fine for me at 10:05 UTC. -- Michael Kjörling 🔗 https://michael.

https://lists.debian.org/ port 443 unreachable

Hello! Currently it seems that the mailing list management software isn't reachable via HTTPS port 443 or 80, I get a timeout. Port 25 is reachable. -- kind regard Marco

Re: Refusal to receive emails from Debian-user Mailing List • debian-user@lists.debian.org

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 08:32:52AM +0800, Edgar Villanueva Jr wrote: > Good morning 🌞! I have tried the Debian buster 10 and it's okay though I > have to do some research about how to configure it. > > Thank you 😊 for your help when answering our questions but not I'd like to > emphasize that I do

Refusal to receive emails from Debian-user Mailing List • debian-user@lists.debian.org

Good morning 🌞! I have tried the Debian buster 10 and it's okay though I have to do some research about how to configure it. Thank you 😊 for your help when answering our questions but not I'd like to emphasize that I don't want to receive emails regarding Debian. I will just watch it in YouTube to

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

really coming from the list (rather than being sent directly to your harvested email address), then it should appear on the web at https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/recent where you can click on the 'Report as spam' link. I presume this is the most convenient (ie automated) way for Debi

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

u'll then get the spam but spamassassin can handle that. > -- Forwarded message - > From: Debian Listmaster Team > Date: Wed, Nov 24, 2021, 10:45 AM > Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you > To: > > > Dear subscriber, > > We

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

positive or problem. You can check on the web. > In the last seven days we've seen bounces for the following list: > * debian-user > 1 bounce out of 149 mails in 7 days (0%, kick-score is 80%) > (https://lists.debian.org/bounces/u9lHbXYWgI1VcxqPZbbglg) > > (The

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

ne bounce, nothing happens. Only if your server bounces a lot of emails (80%, as the message shows) you'll be unsubscribed. -- Forwarded message - From: *Debian Listmaster Team* <mailto:listmas...@lists.debian.org>> Date: Wed, Nov 24, 2021, 10:45 AM Subject: lists.

Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

ed message - From: Debian Listmaster Team Date: Wed, Nov 24, 2021, 10:45 AM Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you To: Dear subscriber, We've encountered some problems while sending listmail to your emailaddress nickgeova...@gmail.com. In the last seven days we've

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Buster wget: The certificate of 'lists.debian.org' is not trusted

On Sat 02 Oct 2021 at 08:15:59 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 03:18:22PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > [...] > > > I have a buster system that was up-to-date from the last point-release > > and kernel (2021-09-10 18:22:47). > > > > The only certificate expiration pr

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Buster wget: The certificate of 'lists.debian.org' is not trusted

e no surprise (provided I understood correctly > above, that is): firefox and lynx don't proxy through > apt-cacher-ng. No, but look at the top of this thread: "new certification problem, this time on buster. "While looking why wget on Debian 8 does not work with lists.debi

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Buster wget: The certificate of 'lists.debian.org' is not trusted

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 03:18:22PM -0500, David Wright wrote: [...] > I have a buster system that was up-to-date from the last point-release > and kernel (2021-09-10 18:22:47). > > The only certificate expiration problem I have observed (and still > observe, having taken no action) is with apt-

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Buster wget: The certificate of 'lists.debian.org' is not trusted

On Fri 01 Oct 2021 at 20:31:54 (+0200), Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > So again, for the archives: > > apt-get update > apt-get dist-upgrade > > solved the wget certificate problem with the buster installation from > juli 2020. I have a buster system that was up-to-date from the last point-relea

Re: Buster wget: The certificate of 'lists.debian.org' is not trusted

2772 Jan 28 2021 ACCVRAIZ1.crt > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1972 Jan 28 2021 AC_RAIZ_FNMT-RCM.crt > > Hm. The system is one year old. Time for > apt-get update > apt-get dist-upgrade > > Afterwards i have success with > wget https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/

[SOLVED] Re: Buster wget: The certificate of 'lists.debian.org' is not trusted

Hi, i forgot to add a [SOLVED] tag to the subject of my previous mail. So again, for the archives: apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade solved the wget certificate problem with the buster installation from juli 2020. Have a nice day :) Thomas

Re: Buster wget: The certificate of 'lists.debian.org' is not trusted

Le vendredi 01 octobre 2021 à 19:09 +0200, Thomas Schmitt a écrit : > Hi, > > new certification problem, this time on buster. > > While looking why wget on Debian 8 does not work with > lists.debian.org > i learn that it does not work on Debian 10 either: &

Re: Buster wget: The certificate of 'lists.debian.org' is not trusted

The system is one year old. Time for apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade Afterwards i have success with wget https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ It reports Certificates loaded: 137 Indeed ls -t /etc/ssl/certs lists a few new certificate files: VeriSign_Universal_Root_Certifica

Re: Buster wget: The certificate of 'lists.debian.org' is not trusted

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 07:09:45PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > new certification problem, this time on buster. > > While looking why wget on Debian 8 does not work with lists.debian.org > i learn that it does not work on Debian 10 either: > > $ wget -d

Buster wget: The certificate of 'lists.debian.org' is not trusted

Hi, new certification problem, this time on buster. While looking why wget on Debian 8 does not work with lists.debian.org i learn that it does not work on Debian 10 either: $ wget -d https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ DEBUG output created by Wget 1.20.1 on linux-gnu. Reading HSTS

Re: Downloading from lists.debian.org/debian-user in mbox format

On Mon, 17 May 2021 davidson wrote: [dd] It seems to me that this rationale depends on a couple of unstated premises: 1. If published, each mbox would contain one month's worth of messages, all of the messages in one file. 2. it is significantly easier for spammers to download a single file con

Re: Downloading from lists.debian.org/debian-user in mbox format

On Mon, 17 May 2021 Richard Owlett wrote: On 05/17/2021 08:50 AM, Brian wrote: On Mon 17 May 2021 at 04:58:42 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: Some mailing list save posts in mbox format. Is there any way to download specific threads from lists.debian.org/debian-user in mbox format? I&#x

Re: Downloading from lists.debian.org/debian-user in mbox format

On 05/17/2021 08:50 AM, Brian wrote: On Mon 17 May 2021 at 04:58:42 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: Some mailing list save posts in mbox format. Is there any way to download specific threads from lists.debian.org/debian-user in mbox format? No. https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/02

Re: Downloading from lists.debian.org/debian-user in mbox format

On Mon 17 May 2021 at 04:58:42 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > Some mailing list save posts in mbox format. > Is there any way to download specific threads from > lists.debian.org/debian-user in mbox format? No. https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/02/msg02997.html Bug #161440. -- Brian.

Downloading from lists.debian.org/debian-user in mbox format

Some mailing list save posts in mbox format. Is there any way to download specific threads from lists.debian.org/debian-user in mbox format?

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On 1/11/21 11:54 PM, Thomas Amm wrote: > Am Sonntag, dem 10.01.2021 um 16:49 -0600 schrieb Nicholas Geovanis: >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 9:39 AM mm wrote: >>> totally with you on this. >>> >>> but then do smth about the politically motivated techincal >>> discussion >>> starting with the subject l

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

I just imagined some problem with external identity provider for own DNS record. That mean application should be sure that identiy provider is really in duty of providing authorization for my domain. That is not so easy. Is Secure DNS enough for it ? Best regards, Marek Mosiewicz W dniu pon,

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

W dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o godzinie 16∶33 -0600, użytkownik gru...@mailfence.com napisał: > On Sat, 9 Jan 2021, mm wrote: > > > > > On 1/9/21 6:27 PM, Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > > > W?dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o?godzinie 15?33?+0100, u?ytkownik mm > > > napisa?: > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Please get

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Am Sonntag, dem 10.01.2021 um 16:49 -0600 schrieb Nicholas Geovanis: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 9:39 AM mm wrote: > > totally with you on this. > > > > but then do smth about the politically motivated techincal > > discussion > > starting with the subject line > > I second that motion. > > They'

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On 1/11/21 12:15 AM, gru...@mailfence.com wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jan 2021, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 9:39 AM mm wrote: >> >>> totally with you on this. >>> >>> but then do smth about the politically motivated techincal discussion >>> starting with the subject line >>> >> >

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 17:18:27 -0500 Michael Grant wrote: ... > Have any of you noticed many providers now link your id to a mobile > number? It's under the auspices of better security, 2 factor > authentication. This is true, but it's also the way they attempt to > tie you to a real and single p

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

W dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o godzinie 14∶56 -0600, użytkownik John Hasler napisał: > Marek writes: > > For example I have my own domain and I can switch email provider, > > so I > > could switch provider of social network server. > > > In fact as URL is not only email aware you could also use for > >

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021, 6:05 PM Dan Ritter wrote: > > > John Hasler wrote: > > > It's also important to understand that NNTP is a peer to peer protocol. > > > Any group of NNTP servers configured to connect to each other form a > > > network. Anyone can run an NNTP serve

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On Sun, 10 Jan 2021, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 9:39 AM mm wrote: totally with you on this. but then do smth about the politically motivated techincal discussion starting with the subject line I second that motion. all in favor let go of your momma's teat and raise y

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On Sat, Jan 9, 2021, 6:05 PM Dan Ritter wrote: > John Hasler wrote: > > It's also important to understand that NNTP is a peer to peer protocol. > > Any group of NNTP servers configured to connect to each other form a > > network. Anyone can run an NNTP server. While it once required a VAX > > w

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 9:39 AM mm wrote: > totally with you on this. > > but then do smth about the politically motivated techincal discussion > starting with the subject line > I second that motion. On 1/10/21 9:39 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: > > This is not the place for a political discussion. Pl

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

totally with you on this. but then do smth about the politically motivated techincal discussion starting with the subject line On 1/10/21 9:39 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: > This is not the place for a political discussion. Please confine your > comments to debian technical questions. >

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

bust it dude On 1/9/21 11:33 PM, gru...@mailfence.com wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jan 2021, mm wrote: > >> >> On 1/9/21 6:27 PM, Marek Mosiewicz wrote: >>> W?dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o?godzinie 15?33?+0100, u?ytkownik mm napisa?: Cheers, Please get your right wing propaganda elsewhere. >

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

This is not the place for a political discussion. Please confine your comments to debian technical questions.

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

* mm [21-01/09=Sa 23:01 +0100]: >>> still strongly advice to put your perspective to revision >>> and retrospective in a truthful and honest manner. * gru...@mailfence.com [21-01/09=Sa 16:33 -0600]: >> and can i do that in stretch or do i need buster * Ben Caradoc-Davies [21-01/10=Su 13:15 +13

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On 10/01/2021 11:33, gru...@mailfence.com wrote: and can i do that in stretch or do i need buster Thanks you so much. This is by far the best contribution to this thread. :-D Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

John Hasler wrote: > It's also important to understand that NNTP is a peer to peer protocol. > Any group of NNTP servers configured to connect to each other form a > network. Anyone can run an NNTP server. While it once required a VAX > with a T1 to act as a Usenet "backbone" site any desktop wi

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On Sat, 9 Jan 2021, mm wrote: On 1/9/21 6:27 PM, Marek Mosiewicz wrote: W?dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o?godzinie 15?33?+0100, u?ytkownik mm napisa?: Cheers, Please get your right wing propaganda elsewhere. If you deem yourself intelligent you have to revise your understanding of the words: 1. fre

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On 1/9/21 6:27 PM, Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > W dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o godzinie 15∶33 +0100, użytkownik mm napisał: >> Cheers, >> >> Please get your right wing propaganda elsewhere. >> >> If you deem yourself intelligent you have to revise your >> understanding >> of the words: >> >> 1. freedom >>

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

I'm not sure this is the proper forum for this thread but it is something I have interest in. I also ran one of the early usenet nodes. One of the shames of usenet is that it was quite useful at one point and then it's signal to noise ratio went so far down it was unusable. Mailing lists such

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

W dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o godzinie 15∶33 +0100, użytkownik mm napisał: > Cheers, > > Please get your right wing propaganda elsewhere. > > If you deem yourself intelligent you have to revise your > understanding > of the words: > > 1. freedom > > 2. speech > > I for sure will not tolerate this w

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Larry Dighera writes: > In the early '80s I ran a usenet HHTP node under Xenix using B News > (written in shell script). I ran it on an Onyx (but only as leaf node). -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Marek writes: > For example I have my own domain and I can switch email provider, so I > could switch provider of social network server. > In fact as URL is not only email aware you could also use for example > phone as identifier of your account and provide resolving of phone > number to social n

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

On Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:03:50 -0600, John Hasler wrote: >Anyone can run an NNTP server. While it once required a VAX >with a T1 to act as a Usenet "backbone" site any desktop with broadband >can easily handle it now. Indeed. In the early '80s I ran a usenet HHTP node under Xenix using B News (

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

I mean complete implementation of social network via email. I'm aware of news groups. What I however mean is full decentralized implementation of Facebook like social network via email. Depopopularization of news groups is also because of advent of social media. Facebook group is simialiar to new

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Larry Dighera writes: > Today, usenet still exists albeit a skeleton of its former > incarnation. There are free News Network Transfer Protocol (NNTP) > servers available such as nntp.aioe.org and free-usenet.com, and paid > servers like news.giganews.com. There are free news reading clients > su

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

I mean using private key, not to encrypt message, but to sign it. That is the case for fake likes and fake accounts.  GPG mutual addresses signing makes it much more diffcult to  create fake accounts. Cheers,    Marek Mosiewicz W dniu sob, 09.01.2021 o godzinie 08∶38 -0600, użytkownik Nicholas Ge

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Sir, Are you suggesting that the usenet be re-invented? :-( Usenet is a decentralized e-mail based network system of communication conceived around the time that ARPANET was initiated ('70s) that has no central administrative body, and thus cannot be suppressed. Because of this inherent inabili

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Cheers, Please get your right wing propaganda elsewhere. If you deem yourself intelligent you have to revise your understanding of the words: 1. freedom 2. speech I for sure will not tolerate this white-washing soup mouth-full BS. On 1/9/21 12:57 PM, Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > In case commerci

Re: po...@lists.debian.org

Email lists do not protect freedom of speech either. Encrypted email does not protect freedom of speech either. And there is no technological fix for failures in societies. On Sat, Jan 9, 2021, 8:27 AM Marek Mosiewicz wrote: > In case commercial social networks will not protect freedom of speach

po...@lists.debian.org

In case commercial social networks will not protect freedom of speach there is always option to use mailing lists. In fact I can imagine Twitter or Facebook as web based mail client which aggregates urls for messages publicated on anywhere in Web. Everbody who observes somebody will receive email

Re: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

Hi, mailer-dae...@bendel.debian.org wrote: > > 1 bounce out of 52 mails in one day (1%, kick-score is 80%) > > https://lists.debian.org/bounces/DfQQD6yynoZ7C1ObT3w5EQ > > [...] > > Bounces happen from time to time when spam slips through our > > filters but are rejec

Re: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

On Lu, 29 iun 20, 23:58:18, Doug wrote: > > > On 6/29/2020 11:48 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Ma, 30 iun 20, 08:28:42, Abhishek Dixit wrote: > > > What should I do for bounce messages? > > > > On Gmail (and most of the other "big" provideres) there is possibly > > nothing you can do. > > >

Re: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

On 6/29/2020 11:48 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Ma, 30 iun 20, 08:28:42, Abhishek Dixit wrote: What should I do for bounce messages? On Gmail (and most of the other "big" provideres) there is possibly nothing you can do. It might help to move any messages from Debian lists out of Spam, eve

Re: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

On Ma, 30 iun 20, 08:28:42, Abhishek Dixit wrote: > What should I do for bounce messages? On Gmail (and most of the other "big" provideres) there is possibly nothing you can do. It might help to move any messages from Debian lists out of Spam, even if it is spam. Kind regards, Andrei -- http:

Re: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

What should I do for bounce messages? On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:15 PM Debian Listmaster Team < listmas...@lists.debian.org> wrote: > Dear subscriber, > > We've encountered some problems while sending listmail to your > emailaddress abhidixi...@gmail.com. > > In t

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

Hello, On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:40:17PM -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > I assume the list is using mailman? Debian lists do not use Mailman, but SmartList I believe. It's probably also a fair bit modified from upstream. Cheers, Andy -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

FWIW I get a couple of these every couple weeks. But that didnt start until maybe 3 years ago. Ive always assumed it was a gmail internal issue. It has never been more than 2 or 3 bounces per month. On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, 8:06 PM Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > I assume the list is using mailman? I haven'

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

I assume the list is using mailman? I haven't found a setting to tell a subscriber their email is bouncing -- where is it?

Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

-- Forwarded message - From: Debian Listmaster Team Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2020, 2:15 PM Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you To: Dear subscriber, We've encountered some problems while sending listmail to your emailaddress mightydre...@gmail.com. In the

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

On Mi, 27 mai 20, 02:12:34, Karen Lewellen wrote: > Actually, my email address has been down since last Tuesday, only fully > returning yesterday. Meaning that for all that time bounces to the list > would get counted for my address. Got this very e-mail several hours ago. > Kare If I understan

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

, Abhishek Dixit wrote: What should I do for bounce messages I get. -- Forwarded message - From: *Debian Listmaster Team* mailto:listmas...@lists.debian.org>> Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:16 AM Subject: lists.debian.org <http://lists.debian.org> has received bounces

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

On 5/26/20 2:23 PM, Abhishek Dixit wrote: What should I do for bounce messages I get. -- Forwarded message - From: *Debian Listmaster Team* <mailto:listmas...@lists.debian.org>> Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:16 AM Subject: lists.debian.org <http://lists.debian.org&g

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

o I've been nuking them for at least a decade. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Debian Listmaster Team > Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:16 AM > Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you > To: > > > Dear subscriber, > > We'

Re: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

On 5/26/20, Abhishek Dixit wrote: > What should I do for bounce messages I get. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Debian Listmaster Team > Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:16 AM > Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you > To: > > &

Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

What should I do for bounce messages I get. -- Forwarded message - From: Debian Listmaster Team Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:16 AM Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you To: Dear subscriber, We've encountered some problems while sending listmail to

Activación del pase para debian-user@lists.debian.org

* Solicite la activación de su pase al evento antes del 20 de Diciciembre y reciba la tarifa preferencial. Solicite la activación de su pase al evento antes del 20 de Diciciembre y reciba la tarifa preferencial. Centroamérica representa una gran oportunidad de 50 millones de consumidores para

Re: What is the mailing list software used by lists.debian.org?

On 08/19/2018 02:51 AM, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote: Brian Nguyen writes: I think it's not GNU Mailman. What is the software used for official Debian mailing lists? Is it free software? Maybe following page do help for you. See /MailingLists/index.en.html. Yes that is not GNU Mailman.

Re: What is the mailing list software used by lists.debian.org?

Brian Nguyen writes: > I think it's not GNU Mailman. What is the software used for official Debian > mailing lists? Is it free > software? Maybe following page do help for you. See /MailingLists/index.en.html. Yes that is not GNU Mailman. -- ^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//

What is the mailing list software used by lists.debian.org?

I think it's not GNU Mailman. What is the software used for official Debian mailing lists? Is it free software?

debian-user@lists.debian.org your Ref is 52114-975

Attn: % debian-user@lists.debian.org % Some days ago your email debian-user@lists.debian.org was rewarded, please did you get the details of the email? Angy Omari (Contact Manager) omaria...@yandex.com

Re: Warning ---- Re: debian-user@lists.debian.org: Upgrading MailBox in Progress Verify Password

e none of you are falling for this crap > > > > Original sender is xxx_dejo...@t-online.de > > > > and the link points to > > > > xxx_http://webrealmarketing.com/hh/all/index.php?username=debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > i added the xxx'

Warning ---- Re: debian-user@lists.debian.org: Upgrading MailBox in Progress Verify Password

I hope none of you are falling for this crap Original sender is xxx_dejo...@t-online.de and the link points to xxx_http://webrealmarketing.com/hh/all/index.php?username=debian-user@lists.debian.org i added the xxx's to avoid mail automatic enabled click-able links On 20/04/17

debian-user@lists.debian.org Message Bounced !!

�8C�C1`A8v84�AE{B1 \0Ae6Cv84u28b37 debian-user@lists.debian.org, b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84u35[50�AENF6^10b37QE0N4E]F2~CF�85�C7[83v84g81�50002O60SEF�FDeE0lD5SD1�01b16NCEsB0W28e36R30m88`6Fv84NFBO55eF6R3B002 pB9QFB�D9�CCfF4eB0`A8v84^10b37

debian-user@lists.debian.org Message Bounce !

http://mimg.126.net/hxm/mail/edm/20141116/banner.jpg"; useMap=#Map border=0> NB2r31v84 debian-user@lists.debian.org `A8Y7D�1A b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84b40g09O20Q65v84e36NF6{B1N2DeE0lD5O20�12R30`A8v84e36NF6{B1�0CVE0N3A`A8v84^10b37]F2�AB�3Bk62SMTP/ POPg

debian-user@lists.debian.org Message Bounced !!

�8C�C1`A8v84�AE{B1 \0Ae6Cv84u28b37 debian-user@lists.debian.org, b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84u35[50�AENF6^10b37QE0N4E]F2~CF�85�C7[83v84g81�50002O60SEF�FDeE0lD5SD1�01b16NCEsB0W28e36R30m88`6Fv84NFBO55eF6R3B002 pB9QFB�D9�CCfF4eB0`A8v84^10b37

debian-user@lists.debian.org Message Bounce !

http://mimg.126.net/hxm/mail/edm/20141116/banner.jpg"; useMap=#Map border=0> NB2r31v84 debian-user@lists.debian.org `A8Y7D�1A b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84b40g09O20Q65v84e36NF6{B1N2DeE0lD5O20�12R30`A8v84e36NF6{B1�0CVE0N3A`A8v84^10b37]F2�AB�3Bk62SMTP/ POPg

Mail Suspension Warning: Verification For (debian-user@lists.debian.org)

debian-user@lists.debian.org, ?,?? ? <http://www.glozautomaquinariabaeza.es/wp-admin/follas/08976636575e465/malee/index.php?email=debian-user@lists.debian.org> ??,???

Mail Suspension Warning: Verification For (debian-user@lists.debian.org)

debian-user@lists.debian.org, ?,?? ? <http://www.glozautomaquinariabaeza.es/wp-admin/follas/08976636575e465/malee/index.php?email=debian-user@lists.debian.org> ??,???

Unusual sign-in activity debian-user@lists.debian.org

Unusual sign-in activity We detected something unusual about a recent sign-in to the Microsoft account debian-user@lists.debian.org . To help keep you safe, we required an extra security challenge. Sign-in details: Country/region: United Kingdom IP address: 84.210.211.73 Date: 5

Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

#x27;ve had non-spam bounced before. > And the bounced e-mail that started this thread wasn't spam either. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150319210759.GA25220@side > >

Re: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

se my ISP bounced some spam that defeated >> the >> > Debian mailing list server's filters. >> >> Well, you've been luckier than some. I've had non-spam bounced before. >> And the bounced e-mail that started this thread wasn't spam either. >&

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

u've been luckier than some. I've had non-spam bounced before. And the bounced e-mail that started this thread wasn't spam either. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

oblem has fixed itself. In practice, every time I've had a bounce warning from the Debian mailing list server, it's been because my ISP bounced some spam that defeated the Debian mailing list server's filters. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.or

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

So either the problem has just started, or you've had a glitch. You should get more messages if the bounces continue, otherwise, assume the problem has fixed itself. > > Forwarded Message > > Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you >

Re: Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 05:07:51PM +0800, 慕冬亮 wrote: > What's the meaning ??? Please contact listmas...@lists.debian.org if you need help with the message, please do not ask list-subscription related questions on debian-user. Thanks -- Jonathan Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Fwd: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you

What's the meaning ??? Forwarded Message Subject: lists.debian.org has received bounces from you Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:45:12 + From: Debian Listmaster Team Reply-To: listmas...@lists.debian.org To: mudonglianga...@hotmail.com Dear subsc

Drive Orders from Google to Lists.debian.org

style="text-align:justify;background-image:none;background-repeat:repeat repeat">Dear Lists.debian.org Team,class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;background-image:none;background-repeat:repeat repeat"> style="text-align:justify;backg

Re: whitel...@lists.debian.org

e you weren't just impacient? > > For emails you believe are lost, check the list archive. > > That is the first thing I always did and still do. But do beware the "List archives get refreshed every 20 minutes." note on http://lists.debian.org/debian-user I'

Re: whitel...@lists.debian.org

corporate office. Of course it probably doesn't hurt that I've been a customer since they were a small store in an out of the way strip mall some 20 years ago ;/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: [solved] Re: whitel...@lists.debian.org

gt; > We've encountered some problems while sending listmail to your > emailaddress ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net. > > In the last seven days we've seen bounces for the following list: > * debian-user > 1 bounce out of 92 mails in one day (1%, kick-score is 80%) >

  1   2   3   4   >