Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote on 11/04/16 17:17:
> Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote on 11/04/16 14:39:
>> Maybe, this "one-liner" does what you want?
>>
>> aptitude -F "%p" search ~Astable| sort | \
>> (aptitude -F "%p" search ~Aunstable ~Atesting | sort -u | \
>> comm -23 --nocheck-order /dev/fd/3 -) 3<
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote on 11/04/16 14:39:
> Maybe, this "one-liner" does what you want?
>
> aptitude -F "%p" search ~Astable| sort | \
> (aptitude -F "%p" search ~Aunstable ~Atesting | sort -u | \
> comm -23 --nocheck-order /dev/fd/3 -) 3<&0
>
This needs a correction, if I'm not mistake
Maybe, this "one-liner" does what you want?
aptitude -F "%p" search ~Astable| sort | \
(aptitude -F "%p" search ~Aunstable ~Atesting | sort -u | \
comm -23 --nocheck-order /dev/fd/3 -) 3<&0
All three archives have to be present with the names used above in your
sources.list file (that is
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:16:03PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>> Not sure if you read the entire thread, I ended up writing a script to
>> do this now. So, if you want to see packages that are currently
>> installed on your system bu
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:58:32AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 18:40:57 +0900, Mark Fletcher a écrit :
>
> aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
>
> meet your needs?
>
> >>>
> >>>No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
> >>>output. What is it supposed to d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:48:23PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 14:46:05 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >>>Thanks. That's for your Debian Jessie boxes. Is that the same for your
> >>>Raspbian box?
> >>
> >>cat sources.list
> >>deb htt
Le 03-11-2016, à 14:46:05 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>Thanks. That's for your Debian Jessie boxes. Is that the same for your
>Raspbian box?
cat sources.list
deb http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/ jessie main contrib
non-free rpi
and
cat sources.list.d/raspi.list deb
http://ar
On Thu 03 Nov 2016 at 14:46:05 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:29:07PM +0100, steve wrote:
> > Le 03-11-2016, à 13:58:49 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> >
> > >On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
> > >>Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxt
>Thanks. That's for your Debian Jessie boxes. Is that the same for your
>Raspbian box?
cat sources.list
deb http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/ jessie main contrib
non-free rpi
and
cat sources.list.d/raspi.list deb
http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian/ jessie main ui
Hm. So my hunch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:29:07PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 13:58:49 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
> >>Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> >>
> >>>
Le 03-11-2016, à 13:58:49 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>Just wondering: what's the respective content of the /etc/apt/sources.list
>and children?
deb http://httpredir.debian
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:16:03PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Not sure if you read the entire thread, I ended up writing a script to
> do this now. So, if you want to see packages that are currently
> installed on your system but not part of jessie, you can do the
> following.
Thanks, I h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:51:54PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >Just wondering: what's the respective content of the /etc/apt/sources.list
> >and children?
>
> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/
Le 03-11-2016, à 12:45:46 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
Just wondering: what's the respective content of the /etc/apt/sources.list
and children?
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://ftp.ch.debian.org/debian/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:58:32AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 03-11-2016, à 18:40:57 +0900, Mark Fletcher a écrit :
>
> aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
>
> meet your needs?
>
> >>>
> >>>No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not pr
Le 03-11-2016, à 18:40:57 +0900, Mark Fletcher a écrit :
>>aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
>>
>>meet your needs?
>>
>
>No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
>output. What is it supposed to do?
I'm with Kamaraju on this, zero output. I also tried quoting the search
string i
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:36:59AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 02-11-2016, à 22:25:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
>
> >>does
> >>
> >>aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
> >>
> >>meet your needs?
> >>
> >
> >No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
> >output. What is it suppose
Le 02-11-2016, à 22:25:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
does
aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
meet your needs?
No, it does not. When I ran that command it did not produce any
output. What is it supposed to do?
I get this as an output (first few in French, sorry):
i ant - O
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:45 AM, steve wrote:
> Hi Kamaraju,
>
> Le 23-10-2016, à 20:48:46 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
>
>> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
>> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
>> testing or sid?
>
>
> does
>
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:48:46PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
>> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
>> testing or sid?
>
> This is a
Hi Kamaraju,
Le 23-10-2016, à 20:48:46 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
testing or sid?
does
aptitude search ~Ajessie~i
meet your needs?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:48:46PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
> testing or sid?
This is a good question (sorry I don't have the answer here). I recently
hi
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:48 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi
wrote:
> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
> testing or sid?
>
> For example, libkasten2okteta1controllers1abi1 libkasten2okteta1gui1
> are curre
On Oct 23, 2016, at 5:48 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi
wrote:
> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
> testing or sid?
try something like this
aptitude -F ‘%p' search '~i' | while read x; do aptitude -
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:16:56 -0400
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> But now I find that my system has lots of packages from Jessie which
> are no longer present in either Stretch or Sid. I would like get a
> list of all such packages and decide if I want to remove them.
A small change to my first s
Op 26-10-16 om 14:16 schreef kamaraju kusumanchi:
But now I find that my system has lots of packages from Jessie which
are no longer present in either Stretch or Sid. I would like get a
list of all such packages and decide if I want to remove them.
This isn't a complete answer to that, because
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:36:02 -0400
>
> Hmmm...
> Here I get:
> $ apt-show-versions -b | grep "\"
> python3.4:amd64/jessie
> python3.4-minimal:amd64/jessie
>
> What does apt-cache say about python3.4? Here I get
> $ apt-cache policy python3.4
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:36:02 -0400
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Thanks for the script. But I do not think it does what I want. For
> example, currently there is a python3.4 package installed on my
> system.
>
> % dpkg -l python3.4 | cut -c 1-72
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | S
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Michael Lange wrote:
>
> Nice. After these suggestions I hastily put together a small python
> script, that might come close to what Raju wants:
>
> #!/usr/bin/python
>
> from commands import getoutput
>
> allpkgs = getoutput('apt-show-versions -b').splitlines()
>
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:24:00 -0400
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> Oooohhh, shiny new toy that I just found because of you. This came via
> "man apt-show-versions":
>
> To upgrade all packages in testing:
>
>apt-get install `apt-show-versions -u -b | grep testing`
>
> Actually having som
On 10/23/16, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
> currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
> testing or sid?
>
> For example, ibkasten2okteta1controllers1abi1 libkasten2okteta1gui1
> are currently part of stable,
How can I list all the packages installed on my system that are
currently part of the stable distribution but not present in either
testing or sid?
For example, ibkasten2okteta1controllers1abi1 libkasten2okteta1gui1
are currently part of stable, but not present in either testing or
sid. The comman
2014-03-26 9:26 GMT+01:00 Karl E. Jorgensen :
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 03:07:58PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could be useful to someone:
> > dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
>
> Nice. But
>
> dpigs -20
>
dpig -n 20
Hi
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 03:07:58PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could be useful to someone:
> dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
Nice. But
dpigs -20
(from the debian-goodies package) is still shorter :-)
--
Karl E. Jorgensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mi, 26 mar 14, 15:07:58, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could be useful to someone:
> dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
See also:
popcon-largest-unused(8)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian use
Hi,
Could be useful to someone:
dpkg-query -Wf '${Installed-Size}\t${Package}\n' | sort -n | less
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Thank you Tom, this works as expected.
I was expecting ~A to match far less, but on second thought there will
be enough cases where the broader scope is essential.
All the best,
Peter
On 17.02.2014 22:04, Tom H wrote:
What is the correct filter to:
- list all installed packages coming from t
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Peter Schott wrote:
>
> What is the correct filter to:
> - list all installed packages coming from testing release;
> - while *not* listing installed packages from other releases (e.g. stable)
> for which an alternative version from testing is available?
aptitude
Hello all,
on a system I operate, Debian Squeeze 6.09 has been installed. At one
point, it was necessary to install a more recent version of roundcube
(web-mail client) out of the testing release. This of course caused some
other packages to be updated to testing, too.
My objective is as fol
On Mi, 24 apr 13, 08:43:07, green wrote:
>
> Following are the commands I use for backup and restore of the package
> selection. Please note that I have not needed to use these commands
> for some time. In fact, aptitude-create-state-bundle arrived some
> time after I implemented this; I have no
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:12:44PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
> The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
> packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
> aptitude that would be packages marked as "i " but not as &qu
Mark Weyer wrote at 2013-04-23 16:12 -0500:
> The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
> installed packages except those automatically installed to satisfy
> dependencies. In aptitude that would be packages marked as "i " but
> not as "i A"
On 24 Apr 2013, Lars Nooden wrote:
> On 04/23/2013 09:12 PM, Mark Weyer wrote:
> >
> >The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
> >packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
> >aptitude that would be packa
On 04/23/2013 09:12 PM, Mark Weyer wrote:
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed packages except those
automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In aptitude that would be packages marked as
"i " but not as "i A". And if there i
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:12:44PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
>
> The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
> installed packages except those automatically installed to satisfy
> dependencies. In aptitude that would be packages marked as "i " but
> n
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:12:44 +0200
Mark Weyer wrote:
>
> The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list
> installed packages except those automatically installed to satisfy
> dependencies.
>
aptitude search '~i!~M'
--
EMACS is my operating s
On 4/23/2013 17:11, staticsafe wrote:
> On 4/23/2013 17:12, Mark Weyer wrote:
>>
>> The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
>> packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
>> aptitude that would be packa
Hi Mark,
the following should work, listing only the manually installed packages.
aptitude search '?installed?not(?automatic)' -F %p | sed 's/ //g'
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Mark Weyer wrote:
>
> The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I
On 4/23/2013 17:12, Mark Weyer wrote:
>
> The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
> packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
> aptitude that would be packages marked as "i " but not as "i A".
The title is imprecise. Actually, the question is: How do I list installed
packages except those automatically installed to satisfy dependencies. In
aptitude that would be packages marked as "i " but not as "i A". And if there
is no command to list this, where in /etc (
On 08 Feb 2004, Sam Halliday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i would like to get a listing of all the packages i have installed, with
> the branch tag beside it.
apt-show-versions should do the trick
--
Philipp Weis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freiburg, Germany http://pweis.com/
--
To UNSUBS
hi there,
there are many ways to list all the packages a system has installed, but
unfortunately i cannot find how to get a list the way i want.
i would like to get a listing of all the packages i have installed, with
the branch tag beside it.
dpkg -l
seems to come closest, but lists the pack
Michael D Schleif wrote:
dpkg -l | grep ^i
hth
That's what I used to use, but you'd have to specify something like
COLUMNS='150' dpkg -l |grep ^i
Otherwise, you'll have names like this returned:
ii xtightvncviewe 1.2.7-3Virtual network computing client
software fo
Notice how
Nick Hastings wrote:
* Dave Carrigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040130 00:46]:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 07:58:36PM +0900, Nick Hastings wrote:
No I don't think so, note the "-w" flag. It will only match if the
package name _is_ "install".
That is correct, the -w flag makes it catch the entire
* Dave Carrigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040130 00:46]:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 07:58:36PM +0900, Nick Hastings wrote:
>
> > Careful, dpkg --get-selections doesn't always list only installed
> > packages
> > Try:
> >
> > dpkg --get-selections | grep -w install | cut -f1
>
> To be pedantic, this wi
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:21:38PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The origional idea for this was for instances of having installed
> something to try it out, then removing it. If a bunch of dependencies
> were pulled in, I don't remember what they are. Over time this leads to
> lots of
On 2004-01-29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] penned:
>
> The origional idea for this was for instances of having installed
> something to try it out, then removing it. If a bunch of dependencies
> were pulled in, I don't remember what they are. Over time this leads
> to lots of cruft on the system that takes
Thanks, for all the replies, they've been very helpfull.
At this point I should probably clarify what I'd like to do, since
thinking about it has brought about some changes. Dpkg keeps a record
of a few things- mainly package lists, their current state, and their
selected state.
This is all gr
On 2004-01-29, Pedro M. penned:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I know that somewhere there is a command to list all installed
>> packages (I even remember using it way back when...), but I can't
>> seem to find it. I've looked at the various apt utility man pages
>> and have not foun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I know that somewhere there is a command to list all installed packages
(I even remember using it way back when...), but I can't seem to find it.
I've looked at the various apt utility man pages and have not found
anything, even for apt-cache. I'm trying to writ
* "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:01:29:00:27:11-0500] scribed:
> Hi all,
>
> I know that somewhere there is a command to list all installed packages
> (I even remember using it way back when...), but I can't seem to find it.
> I've looked at the various apt utility man pages and ha
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 07:58:36PM +0900, Nick Hastings wrote:
> Careful, dpkg --get-selections doesn't always list only installed
> packages
> Try:
>
> dpkg --get-selections | grep -w install | cut -f1
To be pedantic, this will fail if a package has the string "install" in
its name and is in a
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040129 15:24]:
>
>
> Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:27:11AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>I know that somewhere there is a command to list all installed packages
> >
> >
> >Perhaps "dpkg --get-selections" would be a good s
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:27:11AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that somewhere there is a command to list all installed packages
Perhaps "dpkg --get-selections" would be a good starting point?
Doh!
I completely forgot about dpkg, I'm so used to apt.
This
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:27:11AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I know that somewhere there is a command to list all installed packages
Perhaps "dpkg --get-selections" would be a good starting point?
--
Jamin W. Collins
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question.
Hi all,
I know that somewhere there is a command to list all installed packages
(I even remember using it way back when...), but I can't seem to find it.
I've looked at the various apt utility man pages and have not found
anything, even for apt-cache. I'm trying to write a script to run the
co
66 matches
Mail list logo
