On Thursday 18 October 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Why? I have been running without udev without problems and for the few
> > things that need a directory to place a udev rule, I simply create the
> > directory
>
> I do not use udev and I am happy with all the systems I have used
> without
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:23:27PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Why? I have been running without udev without problems and for the few things
> that need a directory to place a udev rule, I simply create the directory
I do not use udev and I am happy with all the systems I have used
without it. I
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:23:27PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Why? I have been running without udev without problems and for the few things
> that need a directory to place a udev rule, I simply create the directory
> when an error messages complains about this. So ... the rule is there and I
>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:23:27PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Why? I have been running without udev without problems and for the few things
> that need a directory to place a udev rule, I simply create the directory
> when an error messages complains about this. So ... the rule is there and I
>
Why? I have been running without udev without problems and for the few things
that need a directory to place a udev rule, I simply create the directory
when an error messages complains about this. So ... the rule is there and I
do not use it.
Maybe it is time to go to udev, it does work fine on
5 matches
Mail list logo
