Re: lightweight caching www proxy

2001-01-23 Thread kmself
on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:01:23PM +1030, David Purton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: > > > on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:42:29PM +1030, David Purton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, I'm looking to set up a caching www proxy on my dialup

Re: lightweight caching www proxy

2001-01-23 Thread David Purton
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: > on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:42:29PM +1030, David Purton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > > > Hi, I'm looking to set up a caching www proxy on my dialup machine. > > > > Can anybody recommend a lightweight option here? > > > > I looked at squid,

Re: lightweight caching www proxy

2001-01-23 Thread kmself
on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:42:29PM +1030, David Purton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hi, I'm looking to set up a caching www proxy on my dialup machine. > > Can anybody recommend a lightweight option here? > > I looked at squid, but it seems a bit of an overkill for what I want. Define your n

Re: lightweight caching www proxy

2001-01-22 Thread Joerg Johannes
Try wwwoffle (sounds funny, doesn't?). Very good program joerg David Purton schrieb: > > Hi, I'm looking to set up a caching www proxy on my dialup machine. > > Can anybody recommend a lightweight option here? > > I looked at squid, but it seems a bit of an overkill for what I want. > >

lightweight caching www proxy

2001-01-22 Thread David Purton
Hi, I'm looking to set up a caching www proxy on my dialup machine. Can anybody recommend a lightweight option here? I looked at squid, but it seems a bit of an overkill for what I want. Today people in droves hurry up past Heumoz to Vill