Re: libg++ for 1.1

1996-12-20 Thread joost witteveen
> > I am trying to build octave 2.0 on my 1.1 system. I did not have the c++ > libs (libg++), but if I get the new libg++, that depends on libc5.4, but I > have libc5.2. (I am assuming that my lack of the c++ libs is what is causing > the octave configure script to think my C++ compiler does not w

Re: libg++ for 1.1

1996-12-19 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Thu, 19 Dec 1996, Hunter Marshall wrote: > I am trying to build octave 2.0 on my 1.1 system. I did not have the c++ > libs (libg++), but if I get the new libg++, that depends on libc5.4, but I > have libc5.2. (I am assuming that my lack of the c++ libs is what is causing > the octave configure

libg++ for 1.1

1996-12-19 Thread Hunter Marshall
I am trying to build octave 2.0 on my 1.1 system. I did not have the c++ libs (libg++), but if I get the new libg++, that depends on libc5.4, but I have libc5.2. (I am assuming that my lack of the c++ libs is what is causing the octave configure script to think my C++ compiler does not work (the c+