er still segfaults, presumably
because it doesn't like having libg++ linked against libc5.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:19:53AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> I'm trying to install some software whose installer wants to see
> libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2, libg++.so.2.7.2, and libstdc++.so.27.
> I've installed libg++27 and symlinked those libraries from
> /usr/lib/libc5-
I'm trying to install some software whose installer wants to see
libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2, libg++.so.2.7.2, and libstdc++.so.27.
I've installed libg++27 and symlinked those libraries from
/usr/lib/libc5-compat to /usr/lib and /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3
to libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2.
> "Graeme" == Graeme Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Graeme> If you want to search for the package that a file belongs to, find
Graeme> /debian/dists/potato/Contents-i386.gz and zgrep for particular
files.
`dpkg-awk' works pretty good, and so does `apt-cache', for finding
thi
I was under the impression that libg++ was an old class library that the
FSF used to distribute with the g++ compiler. When the C++ Standard
started to near finalization the FSF produced (and/or ported) their own
version of the Standard Library that became libstdc++. libstdc++
contains the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>While on the subject of 2.3.99-pre8, can Debian users who have tried it
>comment on its stability (or lack thereof) for basic home-use (email &
>WWW browsing under X) with Debian potato ? How about with Debian woody ?
Though I haven't tried 2.3.99-pre8 personally, I've tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
"S. Salman Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone please highlight the difference between libg++ and libstdc++
> ?
IIRC, libstdc++ has now been split into two packages: libg++ and libstdc++.
libg++ contains the
nevermind found what i needed!
- Original Message -
From:
Beavis
To: debian list
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 4:03
PM
Subject: libg++
i am install StarOffice-3.1 from a tar because i
could not find it in a deb format.
it say upon installation, can&#
i am install StarOffice-3.1 from a tar because i
could not find it in a deb format.
it say upon installation, can't load library
libg++.so.27
i have the g++ engine installed.
what package could i be missing?
thankx as always beavis
> Just a quick one, I am trying to get netscape 4.5 going on slink, it seems
> to need libg++ 2.7, the old libs version on slink is 2.8.
If you ever need a specific file, usually a lib like that, use the bottom search
engine at www.debian.org/distrib/packages. I find it VERY useful and I h
>
> Hello all,
>
> Just a quick one, I am trying to get netscape 4.5 going on slink, it seems
> to need libg++ 2.7, the old libs version on slink is 2.8.
>
> Is this on hamm and will it do any damage installing it? If not, where can
> I get it in a .deb?
I think http:/
Hello all,
Just a quick one, I am trying to get netscape 4.5 going on slink, it seems
to need libg++ 2.7, the old libs version on slink is 2.8.
Is this on hamm and will it do any damage installing it? If not, where can
I get it in a .deb?
Thanks.
>
> I downloaded pklin251.exe, to be able to work with .zip files.
> I moved pklin251.exe to /usr/local and, according to pkware's site:
> # chmod 755 pklin251.exe
> # ./pklin251.exe
>
> result:
> # can't load library libg++.so.27
>
> eventhough:
>
&
On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 02:33:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded pklin251.exe, to be able to work with .zip files.
> I moved pklin251.exe to /usr/local and, according to pkware's site:
> # chmod 755 pklin251.exe
> # ./pklin251.exe
>
> result:
> # can&#
On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 14:33:31 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded pklin251.exe, to be able to work with .zip files.
Any particular reason you're not using the "zip" and "unzip" packages from
non-free?
> result:
> # can't load library libg+
I downloaded pklin251.exe, to be able to work with .zip files.
I moved pklin251.exe to /usr/local and, according to pkware's site:
# chmod 755 pklin251.exe
# ./pklin251.exe
result:
# can't load library libg++.so.27
eventhough:
$ dpkg -L libg++272
/.
/usr
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/libg++.so.2.
t; > stdc++-lib. I know that String _is_ in libg++-dev, but stdc++-dev and
> > libg++-dev conflict which each other. I'd like to go back to g++ from GCC
> > but I don't see it anywhere.
> >
> > Please, let me know if that's "a bug".
ftp://llug.sep.bn
ular expression. When I did upgrade, I didn't check if
> > everything had compiled ok.
> >
> > First of all, I had to use EGCS g++, which uses stdc++2.8, as g++ from
> > wasn't anymore in GCC package. It seems there isn't any String class in
> > std
x27;t check if
> everything had compiled ok.
>
> First of all, I had to use EGCS g++, which uses stdc++2.8, as g++ from
> wasn't anymore in GCC package. It seems there isn't any String class in
> stdc++-lib. I know that String _is_ in libg++-dev, but stdc++-dev and
> libg
idn't check if everything had compiled ok.
First of all, I had to use EGCS g++, which uses stdc++2.8, as g++ from
wasn't anymore in GCC package. It seems there isn't any String class
in stdc++-lib. I know that String _is_ in libg++-dev, but stdc++-dev
and libg++-dev conflict which eac
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Dale Martin wrote:
> "Orn E. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If you have to remove all the classes in c++ to get threads working,
> > there isn't much sense in using c++ :-)
> >
> > I've had the same problem, and as far as I've been able to collect,
> > g++ simply isn't
"Orn E. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you have to remove all the classes in c++ to get threads working,
> there isn't much sense in using c++ :-)
>
> I've had the same problem, and as far as I've been able to collect,
> g++ simply isn't, and won't be thread safe. If you wish for a threa
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Dale Martin wrote:
> "Orn E. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If you have to remove all the classes in c++ to get threads working,
> > there isn't much sense in using c++ :-)
> >
> > I've had the same problem, and as far as I've been able to collect,
> > g++ simply isn'
"Orn E. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you have to remove all the classes in c++ to get threads working,
> there isn't much sense in using c++ :-)
>
> I've had the same problem, and as far as I've been able to collect,
> g++ simply isn't, and won't be thread safe. If you wish for a thre
Dale Martin writes:
>
> Are the latest libg++ and threads happy together? I have libg++272 version
> 2.7.2.8-0.1 installed, and I'm running mostly libc6 stuff.
>
> Here's my program, reduced to illustrate the problem precisely.
>
If you have to remove a
Are the latest libg++ and threads happy together? I have libg++272 version
2.7.2.8-0.1 installed, and I'm running mostly libc6 stuff.
Here's my program, reduced to illustrate the problem precisely.
[ begin program ]
#include
#include
#include
#include
#define THREAD
uot;Oh dear" message regarding libg++27.
Could you help me?
Signed,
Melody Bohn
Perplexed In Paradise
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
>
> I am trying to build octave 2.0 on my 1.1 system. I did not have the c++
> libs (libg++), but if I get the new libg++, that depends on libc5.4, but I
> have libc5.2. (I am assuming that my lack of the c++ libs is what is causing
> the octave configure script to think my C++ co
On Thu, 19 Dec 1996, Hunter Marshall wrote:
> I am trying to build octave 2.0 on my 1.1 system. I did not have the c++
> libs (libg++), but if I get the new libg++, that depends on libc5.4, but I
> have libc5.2. (I am assuming that my lack of the c++ libs is what is causing
> the octa
I am trying to build octave 2.0 on my 1.1 system. I did not have the c++
libs (libg++), but if I get the new libg++, that depends on libc5.4, but I
have libc5.2. (I am assuming that my lack of the c++ libs is what is causing
the octave configure script to think my C++ compiler does not work (the c
On Tue, 10 Sep 1996, Amos Shapira wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> |From: Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |> In order to test a local copy of buzz-fixed before burning it on a
> |> CD-ROM, we tried to run "dpkg --root=... --unpack", just to see if the
> |> files aren't corru
Bruce Perens writes:
> The libg++ doesn't compile with the ELF libc. That's why it's in that
> state. I'm not sure what's happening with this - whether there is a
> maintainer working on it or if we're just going to wait for GNU LIBC 6.
What do you mean? l
ad the scripts under /usr/src/boot-floppies . If you don't
have time for this, create a CD-writable pre-master, and go through the
entire installation process with it (magic and all). Then you can come back
and learn the magic later on.
>> The libg++ doesn't compile with the ELF libc.
y
configured tree be provided?
I might be totally wrong here, but I'd like to test things by manually
installing whatever is need to be done, rather than let dselect and
the boot disks do their magic behind my back. I think I'd just feel
more comfortable with the resulting image if I knew what
, as everything will be configured
properly. You might try to extract disks-i386/current/base1_1.tgz there
instead, but that will not completely configure the system so some stuff
might still break.
The libg++ doesn't compile with the ELF libc. That's why it's in that
state. I'm
2
(I've cut a couple of lines to fit to the mail message).
Notice that the system-level error is "No such file or directory".
When run without the --root option, it installs fine.
In addition, libg++ in particular seems to be still in old .deb format
(0.93).
I've updated th
ations
// same as complext.h including cinst.h
#endif
and complext.h like this:
//#include breaks stl (RLB) -- ambiguous instantiations.
// same problem as bastring.h including sinst.h
Don't know if this is your problem, but I thought it might help.
Hopefully libg++ will get this strai
I have been trying to use gcc to compile some C++ code. Libg++27 seems to
be the supplier of standard headers for C++. I have both gcc-2.7.2-8 and
libg++27-2.7.1-2 installed. When I try to compile something, I get:
g++ -c -I./source/include -I/usr/include/g++/std ./source/parody2/tnode.cc
In file
38 matches
Mail list logo
