On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 06:54:37PM +0300, Tommi Komulainen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:12:20PM +0200, Joel Gautschi wrote:
> > > I dit an apt-get remove and apt-get install of libc6, still not working.
> >
> > the following thing worked for me (tk told me the whole thing on #debian):
>
>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:12:20PM +0200, Joel Gautschi wrote:
> > I dit an apt-get remove and apt-get install of libc6, still not working.
>
> the following thing worked for me (tk told me the whole thing on #debian):
For those unfortunate who managed to do the upgrade and now wish to
downgrade,
> I dit an apt-get remove and apt-get install of libc6, still not working.
the following thing worked for me (tk told me the whole thing on #debian):
---
I downgraded the libc in the following order:
libdb2_2.4.14-2.7.7.1.c.deb, libc6*.deb locales_2.1.3-13_i386.deb, all the
files need to be down
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 06:27:49AM -0400, Joel Dinel wrote:
> After doing a routine apt-get dist-upgrade, I started having mail
> problems.
>
That's the reward of naively trusting unstable/woody. There have been
new libc6 packages uploaded which make it necessary to recompile lots
of other packa
After doing a routine apt-get dist-upgrade, I started having mail problems.
When I do a simple "mail somebody" and I try to send the email , this is what I
get :
send-mail: /usr/lib/libdb.so.2: no version information available (required by
send-mail)
The email eventually goes through, but it's
5 matches
Mail list logo