Re: libc6 optimizations

2003-08-24 Thread Neilen
Hi On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 05:24, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:33:11 +0200, > Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Benchmark have been made between Debian, Mandrake and Gentoo, with > > identical version of programs, and there is no si

Re: libc6 optimizations

2003-08-24 Thread Manolis Tzanidakis
[20030823] Mental Patient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was just boredom on the rampage :) :D btw. a good source for "tested" CFLAGS etc. for compiling is gentoo's portage. Just go to www.gentoo.org "view cvs tree" and select the package you want. AFAIR they leave glibc as is, without any C

Re: libc6 optimizations

2003-08-23 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:33:11 +0200, Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Benchmark have been made between Debian, Mandrake and Gentoo, with > identical version of programs, and there is no signficant speedup with > Gentoo. > > As a matter of fact, it is th

Re: libc6 optimizations

2003-08-23 Thread Pierre THIERRY
> I was thinking that in addition to the kernel, libc6 was a good > candidate for a recompile in terms of overall performance boosts. I > know about gentoo, but I dont feel like changing distros. Benchmark have been made between Debian, Mandrake and Gentoo, with identical version of programs, and

Re: libc6 optimizations

2003-08-23 Thread Mental Patient
Manolis Tzanidakis wrote: [20030822] Mental Patient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Earlier today I was toying with the idea of recompiling libc6 with a bunch of optimization flags. I did an apt-get source libc6 and added the flags I wanted. I built binaries via "fakeroot ./debian/rules binary" and

Re: libc6 optimizations

2003-08-23 Thread Mental Patient
Diego Calleja García wrote: El Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:52:12 -0400 Mental Patient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: Its not really critical or anything, I was just wondering about it. Try apt-src/apt-build No, I know how to build the debs. The problem is I belive the CFLAGS I used. The kernel uses -fo

Re: libc6 optimizations

2003-08-23 Thread Diego Calleja García
El Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:52:12 -0400 Mental Patient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Its not really critical or anything, I was just wondering about it. Try apt-src/apt-build -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libc6 optimizations

2003-08-22 Thread Pigeon
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:52:12PM -0400, Mental Patient wrote: > > Anyways... has anyone done this sort of crazy thing? I've locally compiled libc6, among other things. I have a wrapper around gcc to force the flags I want as some makefiles (though not most Debian ones) make it a real pain to r

Re: libc6 optimizations

2003-08-22 Thread Manolis Tzanidakis
[20030822] Mental Patient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Earlier today I was toying with the idea of recompiling libc6 with a > bunch of optimization flags. I did an apt-get source libc6 and added the > flags I wanted. I built binaries via "fakeroot ./debian/rules binary" > and did a dpkg -i on

libc6 optimizations

2003-08-22 Thread Mental Patient
Earlier today I was toying with the idea of recompiling libc6 with a bunch of optimization flags. I did an apt-get source libc6 and added the flags I wanted. I built binaries via "fakeroot ./debian/rules binary" and did a dpkg -i on the resulting deb files. Well, the install hung and failed. l