I have been holding up the upgrade because of this. Meanwhile, several new
versions have been on Sid. Other grave bugs have been closed.
Is it safe to upgrade libc6 stuff?
Is this bug still current?
An amd-64 version bug?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 08:06 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:33:48AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > >On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:17:50PM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> > >>
> > >>This is the the 5th or 6th strange thing that ha
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 08:10 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:33:48AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> >
> > As for apt-spy, it is a handy little tool, but it seems to me that I
> > read in DWN that it was orphaned not too long ago.
> >
>
> just to follow up on
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:33:48AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>
> As for apt-spy, it is a handy little tool, but it seems to me that I
> read in DWN that it was orphaned not too long ago.
>
just to follow up on this, apt-spy is *not* in the list of orphaned
packages, though it does have s
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:33:48AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:17:50PM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> >>
> >>This is the the 5th or 6th strange thing that has happened since I
> >>rebuilt my laptop. The others have all been relat
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:17:50PM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Kevin Ross wrote:
Errors were encountered while processing:
libc6
libc6-amd64
libc6-dev
I'm running Sid with the 2.6.18-4-486 kernel.
Is it e
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:17:50PM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> >Kevin Ross wrote:
> >>>Errors were encountered while processing:
> >>> libc6
> >>> libc6-amd64
> >>> libc6-dev
> >>>
> >>>I'm running Sid with the 2.6.18-4-486 kernel.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Is it even poss
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Kevin Ross wrote:
Errors were encountered while processing:
libc6
libc6-amd64
libc6-dev
I'm running Sid with the 2.6.18-4-486 kernel.
Is it even possible to run 64-bit apps with a 486 kernel?
This is something that I have wondered about too. I've been cu
Kevin Ross wrote:
Errors were encountered while processing:
libc6
libc6-amd64
libc6-dev
I'm running Sid with the 2.6.18-4-486 kernel.
Is it even possible to run 64-bit apps with a 486 kernel?
This is something that I have wondered about too. I've been curious as
to why it was in
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> libc6
> libc6-amd64
> libc6-dev
>
> I'm running Sid with the 2.6.18-4-486 kernel.
Is it even possible to run 64-bit apps with a 486 kernel?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
I ran across a when running apt-get upgrade yesterday. It looks to be a
problem with the postinst script itself, but I'm not positive.
Here is what apt-get reports when setting up libc6.
Setting up libc6 (2.3.6.ds1-11) ...
invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/glibc.sh not found.
dpkg:
11 matches
Mail list logo