Re: libc.so.5

2000-07-22 Thread Mike Werner
David S. Jackson wrote: > This is probably in a FAQ somewhere, but I don't know where. :-) > > I upgraded to Potato just recently (finally) and don't know the > name of the file that provides a compatability library for > libc.so.5. Can anyone tell me so I can apt-ge

libc.so.5

2000-07-22 Thread David S. Jackson
This is probably in a FAQ somewhere, but I don't know where. :-) I upgraded to Potato just recently (finally) and don't know the name of the file that provides a compatability library for libc.so.5. Can anyone tell me so I can apt-get it? TIA! -- David S. Jackson

Re: matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 & libc.so.5 ?)

1999-04-16 Thread Brian Servis
> /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libg++.so.27 (0x400e8000) libstdc++.so.27 => /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libstdc++.so.27 (0x40120 000) libm.so.5 => /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libm.so.5 (0x40152000) libc.so.5 => /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libc.so.5 (0x4015b0

Re: matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 & libc.so.5 ?)

1999-04-16 Thread Robert King
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > Mathworks tech support has been unable to help get matlab 5.3 > running on my Debian system. I was wondering if anybody else has got > it working and perhaps would know how to fix my problem. Hi, I haven't undated my 5.2 to 5.

Re: matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 & libc.so.5 ?)

1999-04-15 Thread Hamori Andras
t; libg++.so.27 => /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libg++.so.27 > (0x4095c000) > libstdc++.so.27 => /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libstdc++.so.27 > (0x4099) > libm.so.5 => /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libm.so.5 (0x409bf000) > -> libc.s

matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 & libc.so.5 ?)

1999-04-14 Thread amj
libc.so.5 . Mathworks says they don't support libc6. If this is the problem how would I, just for matlab ;-), "hide" the fact that libc6 is on my system? How does it find /lib/libc.so.6 when it doesn't want it? Commercial products linked against old libs are frustrating... th

Re: libc.so.5 the stuff from non-free requires

1996-06-06 Thread branderh
> Newbie alert on!!! > Does anyone know of majordomo.deb package that would run with the 0.93 > distribution and the libc that the distribution carries. Do not use 0.93, install 1.1 aka unstable from now on, it is far more stable than 0.93. "Unix: 30 definitions of regular expressions living unde

libc.so.5 the stuff from non-free requires

1996-06-06 Thread Juhani Luhtanen
Newbie alert on!!! Hi the problem is this: I need to install a linux-box that will run WWW-server and a couple of mailing-lists. Just something very straight-forward. I installed the stable 0.93 and got the cern-server up and running. Now majordomo requires libc.5 and the distribution doesn't