> Lynn
> My first post to this list.
Nice of you to join us :)
--
.''`. Paul William
: :' :Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
"Lynn W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My question is, given my httpd.conf settings for PHP4 and ColdFusion,
> should I apt-get apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?
Yes, one of those is probably what you want. :-) You might look at
the respective upstream Web pages (htt
s no need for you to install
SSL separately. However, if you do want to run SSL for other purposes
aside than Webmin, than yes you are correct, you do need something else.
I have pretty much the same set up that you have mentioned below on my
computer and I am using libapache-mod-ssl, it was ver
realised I should perhaps have SSL installed for
> Apache.
>
> My question is, given my httpd.conf settings for PHP4 and ColdFusion,
> should I apt-get apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?
>
> Many thanks!
> Lynn
My first post to this list.
Webmin has its own http server. Y
on is, given my httpd.conf settings for PHP4 and ColdFusion,
should I apt-get apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?
Many thanks!
Lynn
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
uctures", V4.4, when
referring to scheduling.]
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Alexander Meyer wrote:
> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:12:13 +0200
> From: Alexander Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Debian User Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: apache-ssl or libapache-mod-ssl?
&g
Hello:
Any help that anyone can give me or if you can at least point me in the
right direction I would really appreciate it. I installed
libapache-mod-ssl (on a debian system) last week and I haven't been able
to get it to work. I got to the section in the readme file (from the
libapache-mo
On Mon, 28 Juli 2003 18:11:16 -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> ScruLoose wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:12:13PM +0200, Alexander Meyer wrote:
> >
> >>hi list,
> >>
> >>i'm running a webserver for a client who wants to add an online payment
> >>system to his webshop so i have to deploy a ssl-enable
ScruLoose wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:12:13PM +0200, Alexander Meyer wrote:
hi list,
i'm running a webserver for a client who wants to add an online payment
system to his webshop so i have to deploy a ssl-enabled webserver on the
same machine. the question is now if i would upgrade the alre
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:12:13PM +0200, Alexander Meyer wrote:
> hi list,
>
> i'm running a webserver for a client who wants to add an online payment
> system to his webshop so i have to deploy a ssl-enabled webserver on the
> same machine. the question is now if i would upgrade the already runn
hi list,
i'm running a webserver for a client who wants to add an online payment
system to his webshop so i have to deploy a ssl-enabled webserver on the
same machine. the question is now if i would upgrade the already running
apache with mod-ssl or rather install an independent ssl-enabled apache
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021212 03:34]:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:44:37AM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> > Has anybody put together a good, clean way to get mod_ssl to use the
> > /usr/lib/i586/libssl.so.0.9.6 in order to gain that 2x speed boost?
>
> I was under the strong impression
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:44:37AM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> Has anybody put together a good, clean way to get mod_ssl to use the
> /usr/lib/i586/libssl.so.0.9.6 in order to gain that 2x speed boost?
I was under the strong impression that the dynamic loader (since well
before woody at least) lo
Evenin'
Has anybody put together a good, clean way to get mod_ssl to use the
/usr/lib/i586/libssl.so.0.9.6 in order to gain that 2x speed boost?
Is there a better way than either LD_LIBRARY_PATH or replacing the
/usr/lib/lib{ssl,crypto}... with the i586 versions (or symlinks
thereto)? Etiher way
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 17:47:42 +0100, Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Right now I'm using apache-ssl, but I noticed that it is something
> different from apache + libapache-mod-ssl.
>
> What is not clear to me is exactly how the two options differ and what the
> relative pros and con
Hello.
Right now I'm using apache-ssl, but I noticed that it is something different
from apache + libapache-mod-ssl.
What is not clear to me is exactly how the two options differ and what the
relative pros and cons of each choice are. Could anyone shed some light,
please?
TIA,
Andrea.
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:53:10PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:48:05 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> >What is the difference (when would one use what) between
> >libapache-mod-ssl, and apache-ssl? Is one of these "new", since the
> >
On Fri, 24 May 2002 09:52:49 -0400, Ian D. Stewart wrote:
[...]
>Just based on the package names, I would guess that the latter uses the
>Apache module structure, whereas the former has SSL support compiled
>into the main executable.
This is correct. I know it since I've used both.
>
On 2002.05.24 09:53 Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:48:05 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
>What is the difference (when would one use what) between
>libapache-mod-ssl, and apache-ssl? Is one of these "new", since the
>"crypto-in-main" transition? (I
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:48:05 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
>What is the difference (when would one use what) between
>libapache-mod-ssl, and apache-ssl? Is one of these "new", since the
>"crypto-in-main" transition? (I only noticed the -mod-ssl one today,
>
What is the difference (when would one use what) between
libapache-mod-ssl, and apache-ssl? Is one of these "new", since the
"crypto-in-main" transition? (I only noticed the -mod-ssl one today,
I've used apache-ssl in the past.)
Thanks,
Hugo van der Merwe
--
To UNS
and then install the
>libapache-mod-ssl that I have ?
Hmm, libapache-mod-ssl_2.4.10-1.3.9-1.deb is available for
potato in debian-non-US, I just checked.
Mike.
--
Computers are useless, they only give answers. --Pablo Picasso
I can only find the ones compiled for apache 1.3.22, I am running the
apache that came with potato. Should I get the source for libapache and
apache or should I be upgrading apache somehow and then install the
libapache-mod-ssl that I have ?
Thanks
Geoffrey
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 06:26:22PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 04:22:11PM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> > i have mod_perl working like a dream -- and i'd like to add
> > mod_ssl, so:
> [ snip ]
>
> Welcome to the wonderful world of
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 04:22:11PM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> i have mod_perl working like a dream -- and i'd like to add
> mod_ssl, so:
>
> # apt-get -d install libapache-mod-ssl
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The fol
I had the exact same problem when trying to work with the debs.
Ultimatly I ended up just having to download the apache, mod_ssl, mod_perl,
and open_ssl sources and build them all by hand.
It was the only way to get them all to play nicely :)
Sorry, I dont remember the procedure I used, this was
i have mod_perl working like a dream -- and i'd like to add
mod_ssl, so:
# apt-get -d install libapache-mod-ssl
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
apache
The following packages will be REMOVED:
a
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 01:40:32PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I asked this a week or so ago, but it was a day that the mailing list was
> having trouble, so I wonder if many people received it. So, I'm asking
> again. My apologies to those who got it the first time.
>
> Is it legal to use m
I asked this a week or so ago, but it was a day that the mailing list was
having trouble, so I wonder if many people received it. So, I'm asking
again. My apologies to those who got it the first time.
Is it legal to use mod-ssl (or apache-ssl) in the US for commercial
purposes? I've seen some conf
Is it legal to use mod-ssl (or apache-ssl) in the US for commercial
purposes? I've seen some conflicting documentation on the matter (and it
seems like I heard laws changed regarding this recently as well???). Also,
is using mod-ssl or apache-ssl as secure as one of the secure commercial
apache sol
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:08:43 +0100, Igor Mozetic wrote:
[...]
>Install libapache-mod-ssl-doc - this contains very nice documentation.
Thank you very much for pointing me at this package, and it's "parent" package
"libapache-mod-ssl" which I was totally unware
I'm trying to get libapache-mod-ssl working.
When I try to connect via https to the server, Netscape tells me that
there's some strange network error or that the server is misconfigured
basically, that the response came back garbled. So, I found this on
DejaNews:
6.1.3) I do
32 matches
Mail list logo
