Re: ldso part 2

2001-10-29 Thread Greg Wiley
On Saturday, October 27, 2001 4:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I gave removing > > ldso a shot on a non-critical testing machine. > > [...] > > Today's upgrade put ldso right back on. > > [...] > > Now orphaner says, again, that nothing > > depends on ldso and that it may be safely > > removed. > T

Re: ldso part 2

2001-10-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:49:13AM -0700, Greg Wiley wrote: > As suggested by orphaner, I gave removing > ldso a shot on a non-critical testing machine. > No adverse affects as far as I could tell. > > Today's upgrade put ldso right back on. > > Now orphaner says, again, that nothing > depends on

ldso part 2

2001-10-26 Thread Greg Wiley
As suggested by orphaner, I gave removing ldso a shot on a non-critical testing machine. No adverse affects as far as I could tell. Today's upgrade put ldso right back on. Now orphaner says, again, that nothing depends on ldso and that it may be safely removed. Is this a bug? If so, against wha