rade" followed later by "aptitude
>upgrade."
>
>The upgrade went through without any problems, and I'm able to
>launch gimp normally. When I do 'ldd `which gimp`' I don't see
>any reference to libcairo2. My sources.list only contains
>Sarge repos
o the same
library loaded at a different address.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] saslauthd]# ldd saslauthd
> libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x40034000)
> libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x40061000)
> libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x40073000)
&g
in the following case is
does [libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x40034000)] == [libcrypt.so.1 =>
/lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x40154000)]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] saslauthd]# ldd saslauthd
libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x40034000)
libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2
efore running Quake3 will fix the problem."
Now this does work to solve the problem but since ldd is version 2.3.x
I don't think this is the problem, or at least the problem is somewhere
else. Every time I tried to change resolution the program got a signal
11 (but X still changed resolut
Hi. I searched the archives about this and found a thread or two that
was relevant, but they were more than 3 years old. At that time, the
issue was caused by moving ldd from ldso to libc6.
I have a woody system that I recently installed fresh. I have libc6
2.2.5-6. I don't have ldd,
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 21:08, Charlie Grosvenor wrote:
> I have the package libc6 installed but don't have the file /usr/bin/ldd
> How can I solve this problem?
>
apt-get install --reinstall libc6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On 05-Jun-2002 Charlie Grosvenor wrote:
> I have the package libc6 installed but don't have the file /usr/bin/ldd
> How can I solve this problem?
>
install libc6 again. Something must have deleted it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
I have the package libc6 installed but don't have the file /usr/bin/ldd
How can I solve this problem?
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Sean Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean 'Shaleh'
Perry
Sent: 05 June 2002 17:40
To: Charlie Grosvenor
Cc: debian-user@l
On 05-Jun-2002 Charlie Grosvenor wrote:
> Hi
> I have just done a clean install of potato and then upgraded to
> woody. I then tried to install a new kernel, during the install it says
> the following:
>
> Setting up kernel-image-2.4.18-586tsc (2.4.18-5) ...
> /u
Hi
I have just done a clean install of potato and then upgraded to
woody. I then tried to install a new kernel, during the install it says
the following:
Setting up kernel-image-2.4.18-586tsc (2.4.18-5) ...
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: ldd: command not found
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: ldd: command not
Steve Juranich wrote:
More weridness with this, if I run:
ldd /usr/local/games/ut/System/ut-bin
from /lib it works fine, the output is as follows:
libdl.so.2 => ./libdl.so.2 (0x40014000)
libnsl.so.1 => ./libnsl.so.1 (0x40018000)
libpthread.so.0 => ./libpthread.so.0 (0
> More weridness with this, if I run:
>
> ldd /usr/local/games/ut/System/ut-bin
>
> from /lib it works fine, the output is as follows:
> libdl.so.2 => ./libdl.so.2 (0x40014000)
> libnsl.so.1 => ./libnsl.so.1 (0x40018000)
> libpthread.so.0 =&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/me scratches head.
I think I am going to do a install of potato and upgrade
XFree to version 4.x and see if ut works ...
Apt-get upgraded 30 minutes ago. UT continues to run fine.
debian:/home/kevin# ldd /usr/local/games/ut/System/ut-bin
libdl.so.2 => /
Running the command:
ldd /usr/bin/X11/X
yields the message:
X: user not authorized to run the X server, aborting.
Can anyone tell me why?
(What is it about how ldd works that seems to run the executable
enough for the executable to print out a message?)
Thanks,
Daniel
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 08:26:14AM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
> Sorry, if this is a dumb question, but where has ldd gone on woody?
See http://packages.debian.org/ - it's in libc6, so you should have it.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, if this is a dumb question, but where has ldd gone on woody?
The vmware-configure script needs it.
Thank you for your help
--
Heinrich Rebehn
"Have disk - will travel"
University of Bremen
Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering
- Dep
I gave more hard disk space to Debian and therefore had to reinstall it.
When I reinstalled two programs that worked before, I got library error
messages. I then ran ldd and got:
a.out or ELF
What does this mean and what do I do about it?
I ran ldd on programs that do work and got the usual
> This doesn't help if it's not in your path, but:
>
> $ dpkg -S `which ldd`
> libc6: /usr/bin/ldd
OK thanks, I used to do this by grepping /var/lib/dpkg/info/*
> Are there other signs that glibc is broken on your system?
Well, I don't know. I pointed apt-get t
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:33:06AM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> Erh, there used to be something called ldd, right? For finding out
> which dynamic libs an executable linked against? It's gone! Where do I
> get it? Where is there a map of binary names to debs? -chris
>
Thi
Erh, there used to be something called ldd, right? For finding out
which dynamic libs an executable linked against? It's gone! Where do I
get it? Where is there a map of binary names to debs? -chris
> From: Nate Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Daniel Barclay wrote:
> >
> > What exactly does it mean when ldd gives the following error message?:
> >
> > dsb:~# ldd /usr/local/lib/jdk1.3/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so 2>&1
> > /usr/loca
Daniel Barclay wrote:
>
> What exactly does it mean when ldd gives the following error message?:
>
> dsb:~# ldd /usr/local/lib/jdk1.3/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so 2>&1
> /usr/local/lib/jdk1.3/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so: error in loading
> shared libraries:
What exactly does it mean when ldd gives the following error message?:
dsb:~# ldd /usr/local/lib/jdk1.3/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so 2>&1
/usr/local/lib/jdk1.3/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so: error in loading shared
libraries: libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open shared object f
Hi,
Just found that the ldd binary is missing from the ldso package.
Does anyone know what happened to it??
Thanks.
Shao.
--
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1
ris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > /usr/bin/ldd is one of the dynamic-linker utilities, and is provided by
> > the ldso package. It definately ought to be present... I'd suggesr
> > reinstalling ldso.
>
> hmm... ok i am a newbie, how do i do that?
> or can i just copy ldd from someone else his system (debian off course)?
Gregory T. Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> /usr/bin/ldd is one of the dynamic-linker utilities, and is provided by
> the ldso package. It definately ought to be present... I'd suggesr
> reinstalling ldso.
hmm... ok i am a newbie, how do
/usr/bin/ldd is one of the dynamic-linker utilities, and is provided by
the ldso package. It definately ought to be present... I'd suggesr
reinstalling ldso.
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 11:18:59PM +0200, Bruno Van de Casteele wrote:
> hi,
>
> while compiling my kernel (and pine, b
hi,
while compiling my kernel (and pine, but that's smth else), i get an error,
saying missing "ldd" or smth like that (should be in usr/bin/ ?)
what is ldd? it isnt a package in Debian, i think... is it smth special?
B
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:49:23PM +0200, Ingo Hohmann wrote:
<...>
> As ldd seems not to be installed, which package provides it?
<...>
OK, I found it now, it was in the ldso package, I
reinstalled it, et voila!
I still have no clue, why it hasn't been installed
the first t
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 01:14:47AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: missing ldd
> Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 12:07:37AM -0500
>
> In reply to:Brad
>
> Quoting Brad([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
> >
>
On 26-May-99 Brad wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
>
>> So? I don't understand. Do you have ldso installed or not?
>> libc6 doesn't provide ldd, ldso does.
>
> In potato, libc6 does. Apparently ldso does in slink.
Yes, that is what I recall.
Subject: Re: missing ldd
Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 12:07:37AM -0500
In reply to:Brad
Quoting Brad([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> > So? I don't understand. Do you have ldso installed or not?
> > libc6 doesn't pro
On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
> So? I don't understand. Do you have ldso installed or not?
> libc6 doesn't provide ldd, ldso does.
In potato, libc6 does. Apparently ldso does in slink.
Subject: Re: missing ldd
Date: Tue, May 25, 1999 at 10:24:39PM +0200
In reply to:Ingo Hohmann
Quoting Ingo Hohmann([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> in reply to both messages ...
>
> On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 01:46:36AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> <...>
> > > As ld
in reply to both messages ...
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 01:46:36AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
<...>
> > As ldd seems not to be installed, which package provides it?
> >
>
> Try dpgg -S ldd
I've tried it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ingo > dpkg -S ldd
ldso: /usr/man/ma
Subject: missing ldd
Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:49:23PM +0200
In reply to:Ingo Hohmann
Quoting Ingo Hohmann([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> When I run
>
> debian/rules binary
>
> in the gnurobots source dir, it exits with:
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: can
On 24-May-99 Ingo Hohmann wrote:
> When I run
>
> debian/rules binary
>
> in the gnurobots source dir, it exits with:
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: cannot exec ldd: No such file or directory
> dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/tmp/usr/games/grobots
When I run
debian/rules binary
in the gnurobots source dir, it exits with:
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: cannot exec ldd: No such file or directory
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/tmp/usr/games/grobots' gave error exit
status 2
dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code
:-> "Bob" == Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have the same version of ldso on a slink machine and it IS there. I
> don't think there is any reason to file a bug report. I don't know what
> happened on your system, but you might try reinstalling from the cd.
> You cou
On 1 Apr 1999, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> :-> "Bob" == Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What version of ldso do you have installed. It should contain ldd (the
> > potato version does not, however, since it is now included in libc6 2.1.
*- On 1 Apr, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote about "Re: where is ldd ?"
> :-> "Bob" == Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What version of ldso do you have installed. It should contain ldd (the
> > potato version does not, however, sin
:-> "Bob" == Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What version of ldso do you have installed. It should contain ldd (the
> potato version does not, however, since it is now included in libc6 2.1.
Bob, I installed the version 1.9.10-1 that comes with th
What version of ldso do you have installed. It should contain ldd (the
potato version does not, however, since it is now included in libc6 2.1.
Bob
On 1 Apr 1999, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
>
> I've lost ldd, looks like it's not included in the slink distribution.
> Is
I've lost ldd, looks like it's not included in the slink distribution.
Is this a bug or am I supposed to use something else instead?
It has disappeared since I made a total upgrade to slink yesterday.
Stuart Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry to answer myself but I re-installed ldso (1.9.10-1) and ldd is
> back. Don't know what happened.
/usr/doc/libc6/changelog.Debian.gz:
glibc (2.0.7.19981211-2) frozen unstable; urgency=low
* Get ldd out of the libc6 package
Hi,
Sorry to answer myself but I re-installed ldso (1.9.10-1)
and ldd is back. Don't know what happened.
Stuart
Hi,
Did the "ldd" program go away? The man page is still
there from the ldso package in slink but I don't have
an ldd anymore. Anyone know where/why it is gone?
Stuart
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:10:20PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
>
> > > If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running
> > > unstable.
> >
> > If debian unstable isn't tested on machines used for real work,
> > debian i
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 01:10:44PM -0800, David Bristel wrote:
> This is a good point, and it actually leads to an interesting idea
> for a package that would take care of this issue. Now, this is NOT
> an easy project, but, what about a package that has a list of the
> config files for ALL the pa
Seth,
If you want support information like this sugar-coated, you can write it
yourself, you can run it through debian-publicity first, you can make it
however you want. I really don't care. Just so *someone* writes it and
posts it to the appropriate lists. That's being part of the solution.
--
R
JR> Matt Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Which package has the ldd program in it? I could swear this
>> utility used to be on my computer, now it's not (I had that dselect
>> removal disaster mentioned in an earlier post).
Downgrade the ldso package to
>> If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running
>> unstable.
> If debian unstable isn't tested on machines used for real work,
> debian is going to end up a toy distribution which is only suitable for
> work on systems which aren't appropriate for real work.
I agree wh
Matt Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which package has the ldd program in it? I could swear this utility
> used to be on my computer, now it's not (I had that dselect removal
> disaster mentioned in an earlier post).
>
> Thanks,
> MG
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:19:05PM -0500, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> If debian unstable isn't tested on machines used for real work,
> debian is going to end up a toy distribution which is only suitable for
> work on systems which aren't appropriate for real work.
>
> Think about it.
S
EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on
> hold? Get ldso from slink...
> Resent-Date: 17 Mar 1999 20:22:15 -
>
On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> Okay, let's not turn this into a flame war. My point is that
> breakages in unstable are *REALLY BAD THINGS*.
I have no intention of flaming anybody; from my standpoint, at least,
everything I say is sober and reasonable. Everyone else's opini
> > > If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running
> > > unstable.
> >
> > If debian unstable isn't tested on machines used for real work,
> > debian is going to end up a toy distribution which is only suitable for
> > work on systems which aren't appropriate for real
On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> > If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running
> > unstable.
>
> If debian unstable isn't tested on machines used for real work,
> debian is going to end up a toy distribution which is only suitable for
> work on syste
> > May be these chickens are people who have some work to do. These sarcasms
> > or
> > those of Edward Betts will not convince people that Debian is a serious
> > distribution, intended for real work.
> >
>
> If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running
> unstable.
may have noticed that your ldd has disappeared.
>
> May be these chickens are people who have some work to do. These sarcasms or
> those of Edward Betts will not convince people that Debian is a serious
> distribution, intended for real work.
>
If you need your machine for "re
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> May be these chickens are people who have some work to do. These sarcasms or
> those of Edward Betts will not convince people that Debian is a serious
> distribution, intended for real work.
Quite frankly, unstable isn't some
On Sunday 14 March 1999, at 16 h 57, the keyboard of Robert Woodcock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those of you who are tracking unstable but are too chicken to install the
> new glibc 2.1 may have noticed that your ldd has disappeared.
May be these chickens are people who have som
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:44:51PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 04:57:05PM -0800, Robert Woodcock wrote:
> > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or
> > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1.
>
> so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:44:51PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 04:57:05PM -0800, Robert Woodcock wrote:
> > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or
> > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1.
>
> so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:44:51PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or
> > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1.
>
> so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc 2.1? will i still be
> left with a (mostly) usable system?
>
> (i
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 04:57:05PM -0800, Robert Woodcock wrote:
> The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or
> actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1.
so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc 2.1? will i still be
left with a (mostly) usable system?
(i'm willing t
Those of you who are tracking unstable but are too chicken to install the
new glibc 2.1 may have noticed that your ldd has disappeared.
That's because /usr/bin/ldd moved from the ldso package to the libc6
package. Therefore if you're using a new ldso package and an old libc6
package,
I just noticed that I no longer have ldd on my system. I see in the
changelog for ldso that it was removed and is now provided by glibc 2.1.
I have also seen messages which infer that glibc 2.1 isn't quite ready for
use. What is suggested here?
Bob
Bob Nielsen Int
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 12:01:39AM +0100, Laurent PICOULEAU wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar, 1999 à 10:46:59PM -0500, dyer wrote:
> > Matt Garman wrote:
> >
> > > Which package has the ldd program in it? I could swear this utility
> > > used to be on my computer, now it&
On Wed, 10 Mar, 1999 à 10:46:59PM -0500, dyer wrote:
> Matt Garman wrote:
>
> > Which package has the ldd program in it? I could swear this utility
> > used to be on my computer, now it's not (I had that dselect removal
> > disaster mentioned in an earlier post).
Matt Garman wrote:
> Which package has the ldd program in it? I could swear this utility
> used to be on my computer, now it's not (I had that dselect removal
> disaster mentioned in an earlier post).
>
> Thanks,
> MG
>
> --
> Matt Garman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Which package has the ldd program in it? I could swear this utility
used to be on my computer, now it's not (I had that dselect removal
disaster mentioned in an earlier post).
Thanks,
MG
--
Matt Garman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"They're always havin' a good time down on the bayo
Morgan Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have no ldd executable.
Please look at the `libc6' changelog.Debian. If it mentions that
`ldso' needs to be re-installed, that is your problem. I think the
`libc6' package provided the `ldd' binary for a short time.
On 21 Jan 1999, Riku Saikkonen wrote:
> George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Note that I am using the apt method of dselect using the round-robin
> >mirrors so I have no idea which site I was really connected to when I got
> >the bad .deb
>
> Does apt check the MD5sum of the package agai
George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Note that I am using the apt method of dselect using the round-robin
>mirrors so I have no idea which site I was really connected to when I got
>the bad .deb
Does apt check the MD5sum of the package against that in the Packages
file? Does dpkg do that (I
George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ldso 1.9.10 does not include ldd anymore! Where did it go???
It seems you have to reinstall ldso after updating to
libc6_2.0.7.19981211-2. At least it worked for me. Look at the
changelog of libc6.
Torsten
--
Homep
remains strange,
according to the logs, there has been just one version of ldso installed in
the archives.
Anyways, if people still have problems with the missing ldd, get the package
from ftp.debian.org and dpkg -i it.
bye,
-Remco
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 11:05:34AM -0800, Morgan Fletcher wrote:
[...]
> > !search ldd
>potstickr: behold, ldd is in this package: base/libc6,base/ldso
> +(/usr/bin/ldd)
>
> But neither of those packages, as installed on my system, contain ldd:
>
> $ dpkg -L
Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd say reinstall the package, maybe went wrong during installation ? This
> is really strange..
Debian doesn't let you uninstall base packages like libc6 or ldso, and
I don't see a way to force a re-installation of an installed
package. I wonder if
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> $ dpkg -c dists/slink/main/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.9.10-1.deb | grep ldd
> -rwxr-xr-x root/root 100520 1999-01-14 04:23 usr/bin/ldd
> -rwxr-xr-x root/root 1776 1999-01-14 04:23 usr/lib/lddstub
> -rw-r--r--
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 11:05:34AM -0800, Morgan Fletcher wrote:
: But neither of those packages, as installed on my system, contain ldd:
:
: $ dpkg -L ldso libc6 | grep -i ldd
: /usr/lib/lddstub
: /usr/man/man1/ldd.1.gz
That's kinda strange. I assume, you mean with `current
I have no ldd executable.
I installed slink onto a tabula rasa i386 PC a few days ago, using
3.5" floppies for the base system. Once I'd installed the base, I did
an `apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade`. What I didn't realize, or think
to look for, is that the slink base install i
; at least, recognizes that some libs go with libc5 and others with
> libc6. However, (also below) ldd tries to link EVERYTHING with
> libc6!!! I can't figure out what setting I could possible modify to fix
> this...
I have a theory... I'll bet you are missing the libc5 coma
der if there is perhaps something misconfigured on your
> system..
Me too! I have some sample output below... you can see that ldconfig,
at least, recognizes that some libs go with libc5 and others with
libc6. However, (also below) ldd tries to link EVERYTHING with
libc6!!! I can&#x
On 10 Jun 1997 09:59:35 +0200 hogendoorn r.a. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am trying to rebuild python, using libc6.
> During the build of the python-misc package, I get an error from
> dpkg-shlibdeps
>
> "unknown output from ldd on dlmodule.so: --list (0x)"
I am trying to rebuild python, using libc6.
During the build of the python-misc package, I get an error from dpkg-shlibdeps
"unknown output from ldd on dlmodule.so: --list (0x)"
Indeed, when I execute ldd, I get
artasp1# ldd ./dlmodule.so
libdl.so.2 => /l
86 matches
Mail list logo
