On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 10:06:56AM +0930, Tom Cook wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am fairly new to latex, so this could easily be something I am doing
> wierd, but...
>
> When I use latex to convert a source file into a dvi, the dvi looks
> great. Then when I use either dvips->gs or dvipdf to convert th
> Now all my text appears beautifully in both xpdf and acroread (using
> pdflatex), BUT... I also have some bitmapped eps files I am
> including. These are graphs (simulink output, actually) which I had
> to screengrab on an NT box, using Gimp for win32, save as a jpeg (the
> NT gimp I have access
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 11:16:47AM +0930, Tom Cook wrote:
> Thanks to all who responded. pdflatex is a tool which someone told me
> about, but which I couldn't find (I was looking for latexpdf or
> latex2pdf or something of the like, since that is the way all the
It is probably already installed
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Tom Cook wrote:
> When I use latex to convert a source file into a dvi, the dvi looks
> great. Then when I use either dvips->gs or dvipdf to convert the dvi
> into a pdf, the pdf looks OK in acroread but unintelligable in xpdf.
I am using
\usepackage{pslatex}
in all my lat
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 11:16, Tom Cook wrote:
> Thanks to all who responded. pdflatex is a tool which someone told me
> about, but which I couldn't find (I was looking for latexpdf or
> latex2pdf or something of the like, since that is the way all the
> other converters are named). Changing /etc
Thanks to all who responded. pdflatex is a tool which someone told me
about, but which I couldn't find (I was looking for latexpdf or
latex2pdf or something of the like, since that is the way all the
other converters are named). Changing /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap to
type1_default=true also fixed th
>Hmm. I just ran xpdf on an old pdf file that was created using TeX, and
>it says:
> Error: This document uses Type 3 fonts - some text may not be correctly
displayed
>and gives the same kind of display as what you describe, so this may be
>your problem. xpdf doesn't understand Type 3 fonts. (Ty
Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I use latex to convert a source file into a dvi, the dvi looks
> great. Then when I use either dvips->gs or dvipdf to convert the dvi
> into a pdf, the pdf looks OK in acroread but unintelligable in xpdf.
What version of gs are you using? Versions bef
> Hi all,
>
> I am fairly new to latex, so this could easily be something I am doing
> wierd, but...
>
> When I use latex to convert a source file into a dvi, the dvi looks
> great. Then when I use either dvips->gs or dvipdf to convert the dvi
> into a pdf, the pdf looks OK in acroread but unint
> "Tom" == Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> When I use latex to convert a source file into a dvi, the dvi looks
Tom> great. Then when I use either dvips->gs or dvipdf to convert the
Tom> dvi into a pdf, the pdf looks OK in acroread but unintelligable in
Tom> xpdf.
I don't use xpdf m
* Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020521 02:36]:
> When I use latex to convert a source file into a dvi, the dvi looks
> great. Then when I use either dvips->gs or dvipdf to convert the dvi
> into a pdf, the pdf looks OK in acroread but unintelligable in xpdf.
I think, that pdf's look quite better
Hi all,
I am fairly new to latex, so this could easily be something I am doing
wierd, but...
When I use latex to convert a source file into a dvi, the dvi looks
great. Then when I use either dvips->gs or dvipdf to convert the dvi
into a pdf, the pdf looks OK in acroread but unintelligable in xpd
12 matches
Mail list logo
