Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:So what is the ksmbfs pkg for anyway?
:
: I think that the ksmbfs stuff got merged in samba a few versions
: back. Perhaps the ksmbfs package will disappear eventually.
To summarize:
Package samba: it allows to convert your Linux box in a SMB
That works great. Thanks. Linux box reaches out across the Ethernet and
grabs files from the windoze95 machines just fine.
I was under the (apparently false) impression that ksmbfs was sufficient
if all you wanted was a smb client on the Linux box, that Samba was
necessary only
i386/net/samba_1.9.18p2-1.deb
That works great. Thanks. Linux box reaches out across the Ethernet and
grabs files from the windoze95 machines just fine.
I was under the (apparently false) impression that ksmbfs was sufficient
if all you wanted was a smb client on the Linux box, that Samba was
neces
/net/samba_1.9.18p2-1.deb
Yeah, that sat up and talked accross the Ethernet just fine. Thanks.
Now, I had the impression that ksmbfs was all you needed if you just
wanted a smb client, not a server, on a Linux box. What is the purpose of
the ksmbfs pkg?
Richard B. Talley <[EMAIL
On Sat, 14 Feb 1998, Richard B. Talley wrote:
: I can't find smbclient or smbmount anywhere on the system. I've been
: through all the FAQ's and HOWTO's.
Try the samba package:
hamm/hamm/binary-i386/net/samba_1.9.18p2-1.deb
bye,
Remco
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the w
Howdy,
I wanted to add a Linux box to my home network so I dragged out an old 386
and downloaded the latest stable Debian release.
I enabled smb support when I installed the kernal.
Installation and smoke test went fine.
I used dselect to install the ksmbfs pkg. (I want to mount some of my
Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> >Who is changing the kernel driver and not keeping the userland utilities
> >up to date? Unfortunately this happens all too often with Linux.
>
> I think it is Bill Hawes. I know he has been dealing with the userland
> utilities but development is so fast that is hard to ke
[I am Cc'ing Bill Hawes just in case he is interested]
At 05:26 PM 12/16/97 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>Thanks for your reply Eloy.
No problem. I like to know and keep up with any problems with the packages
I maintain.
>Who is changing the kernel driver and not keeping the userland utilities
On Mon, Dec 15, 1997 at 04:16:17PM +, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> I started to maintain ksmbfs that is now called smbfs. Last week I
> uploaded the libc6 version.
>
> However, I don't know anything about the 2.1 kernels. For me, it is
> too bloody to be in the bleeding edge o
Hi,
I started to maintain ksmbfs that is now called smbfs. Last week I
uploaded the libc6 version.
However, I don't know anything about the 2.1 kernels. For me, it is
too bloody to be in the bleeding edge of kernel development. I know
that Volcker Lendecke is too busy these days to take a
Has anyone else had kernel SMB fs support working
with recent 2.1 kernels and the ksmbfs package (2.0.1-2)?
It says
smb_read_super: need mount version 6
and gives up for me.
thanks,
Hamish
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 28 Sep 1996, Jim Pick wrote:
> > smbmount does not preserve the long filenames of windows 95
> >
> > is there a way to fix this problem
> >
> You can compile the kernel to use long file names. This is an
> experimental feature. One problem though - it doesn't work!!
> There are some m
> smbmount does not preserve the long filenames of windows 95
>
> is there a way to fix this problem
>
> -thanks
>
> Oz
>
You can compile the kernel to use long file names. This is an
experimental feature. One problem though - it doesn't work!!
There are some major bugs in the implementat
smbmount does not preserve the long filenames of windows 95
is there a way to fix this problem
-thanks
Oz
--
<
NAME Oz Dror, Santa Monica, California
EMAIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] <>
PHONE Fax (3
14 matches
Mail list logo
