rlharris writes:
> Coming from a rodentless background (typewriter, early dedicated word
> processors, and even M$ Word 5.0 for DOS), I have little use for the
> rodent, and I have even less tolerance for the beast. From my
> perspective, the rodent is not a cute little "mouse"; it is an ugly
> a
etty much what TEMACS
> *was*. Emacs was initially built on TEMACS.
>
> No, you don't need Emacs to get the benefit of keyboard macros. You
> also don't need to learn how to create keyboard macros to get some of
> the benefits of Emacs.
Emacs has received a regular mentio
On 2019.03.28 12:58, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Not responding specifically to the following, but keyboard / keystroke
macros
are not a strictly EMACS function, and I don't think EMACS was first.
...
Just saying, you don't need EMACS to get the benefit of keyboard
macros.
The pa
on TEMACS.
No, you don't need Emacs to get the benefit of keyboard macros. You
also don't need to learn how to create keyboard macros to get some of
the benefits of Emacs.
--
John "I once actually *used* TEMACS" Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
e keyboard shortcuts (on DOS) also
had them,
Just saying, you don't need EMACS to get the benefit of keyboard macros.
On Thursday, March 28, 2019 01:34:49 PM rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> But when the first task is going to take an hour and severely tax your
> manual (finger) dexterity, wh
Hi ppl,
I am having a problem migrating from SecureCRT to a standard unix term. I need to be
able to map keys
like i do in securecrt.
For example i have a macro where i spawn 5 shells on different places. I have it bound
to
F1 for example. In SecureCRT i have the following KEY MAP for doing th
Hi ppl,
I am having a problem migrating from SecureCRT to a standard unix term. I need to be
able to map keys
like i do in securecrt.
For example i have a macro where i spawn 5 shells on different places. I have it bound
to
F1 for example. In SecureCRT i have the following KEY MAP for doing th
7 matches
Mail list logo
