On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Sven Schumacher wrote:
> You wrote:
> > Ach. Looks like I'm not the only one.
> >
> > I gather that the linker is is now less forgiving.
> >
> Oh thanks... I hoped for this message... since hours I tried to compile,
> thought even, that I try to use a broken module, but it
You wrote:
> Ach. Looks like I'm not the only one.
>
> I gather that the linker is is now less forgiving.
>
Oh thanks... I hoped for this message... since hours I tried to compile,
thought even, that I try to use a broken module, but it looks just like
your error. I compiled 2.4.16 several times
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Brandon N wrote:
>
> --- Greg Wiley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all-
> >
> > I have successfully built the 2.4.16 kernel several
> > times but suddenly cannot. I am running an up-to-
> > date Woody and am wondering if some recent package
> > update(s) might be the pro
--- Greg Wiley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I have successfully built the 2.4.16 kernel several
> times but suddenly cannot. I am running an up-to-
> date Woody and am wondering if some recent package
> update(s) might be the problem. Does anyone have
> any idea what would cause the
Ach. Looks like I'm not the only one.
I gather that the linker is is now less forgiving.
-g
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Wiley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:34 AM
Subject: kernel suddenly not linking
> Hi all-
>
>
Hi all-
I have successfully built the 2.4.16 kernel several
times but suddenly cannot. I am running an up-to-
date Woody and am wondering if some recent package
update(s) might be the problem. Does anyone have
any idea what would cause the linker output in the
attached text?
TIA,
-=greg
ld
6 matches
Mail list logo
