On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:11:08 +0200
Marcus Blumhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, please CC me when replying, since I am not subscribed to
> this list.
>
> > [...]
> > And as I rarely decompress files, I have forgotten the command to
> > decompress tar/bz2 files .
> > [...]
Hi,
First of all, please CC me when replying, since I am not subscribed to
this list.
> [...]
> And as I rarely decompress files, I have forgotten the command to
> decompress tar/bz2 files .
> [...]
I just wanted to add my ¢2. You may want to evaluate the package named
"unp" and you will never
Ed Jabbour([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2007 21:27, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > >Anybody? Where do people dump their kernel source anyway???
> >
> > I have always put my kernels in /usr/src. First time I've _ever_
> > heard of " DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area".
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 21:27, Wayne Topa wrote:
> >Anybody? Where do people dump their kernel source anyway???
>
> I have always put my kernels in /usr/src. First time I've _ever_
> heard of " DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area". Just what readme did you
> see _that_ in?
From linux-source-2.6.1
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:36:52 +0900
Takehiko Abe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> >>> Well, I always store there all the sources related with my
> >>> kernel, modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW,
> >>> remember doing the symlink to /usr/src/linux from your
>
El Mar, 14 de Agosto de 2007, 8:29 pm, Frank McCormick escribió:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
>> Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Frank McCormick wrote:
>> > > I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
>> > > which aptitude dumped into /usr
Frank McCormick wrote:
>>> Well, I always store there all the sources related with my kernel,
>>> modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW, remember doing
>>> the symlink to /usr/src/linux from your kernel-source.
>>
>> Well then why the warning from the Kernel developers? And what's
>> t
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Frank McCormick wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
which aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of
the first
Frank McCormick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
> > Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Frank McCormick wrote:
> > > > I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
> > > > which aptitude dumped into
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
> Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frank McCormick wrote:
> > > I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
> > > which aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of
> > > the first things it says is " D
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have taken the first steps towards compiling an Nvidia module for
> > my Quadro-pro card...
> > I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel, which
> > a
Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>
> I have taken the first steps towards compiling an Nvidia module for my
> Quadro-pro card...
> I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel, which
> aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of the first
> things it says is " DO NOT USE TH
I have taken the first steps towards compiling an Nvidia module for my
Quadro-pro card...
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel, which
aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of the first
things it says is " DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area" because that is
whe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:40:22AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-31 19:02:36 +1000]:
>
> > > Do i need /usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm ?
> >
> > Yes. Some source code will reference it. But most importantly libc
> > will
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:40:22AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-31 19:02:36 +1000]:
> > Do i need /usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm ?
>
> Yes. Some source code will reference it. But most importantly libc
> will reference it internally to other headers
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 07:02:36PM +1000, Russell wrote:
> I found some interesting things from
> http://www.opensound.com/linux-x86.html :
>
> The problem under Debian and SuSE is that the linux kernel is
> not installed under /usr/src/linux - so you just need to ensure
> that /usr/src/linu
Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-31 19:02:36 +1000]:
> In my debian 3 system, i've got no /usr/src/linux directory
> or symlink. In what situations do i need the kernel source
> here?
None unless you _want_ to put things there.
> Do the 'generic' kernel compiling/installation instructions su
Hi,
In my debian 3 system, i've got no /usr/src/linux directory
or symlink. In what situations do i need the kernel source
here?
Do the 'generic' kernel compiling/installation instructions such
as at http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Kernel-HOWTO.html apply ok to
a debian system?
Do i need /usr/include
18 matches
Mail list logo
