Am 06.02.2017 um 00:12 schrieb Ben Caradoc-Davies:
> On 06/02/17 09:59, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
>> Am 05.02.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have upgraded my PC to newest chipset and CPU: Kaby Lake, Z270 with
>>> i7-7700K.
>>> Out of curiosity I did a kernel benchmark.
On 06/02/17 09:59, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
Am 05.02.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder:
Hi,
I have upgraded my PC to newest chipset and CPU: Kaby Lake, Z270 with i7-7700K.
Out of curiosity I did a kernel benchmark. Comparing darktable performance with
kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64 and 4.9.0
Am 05.02.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder:
> Hi,
>
> I have upgraded my PC to newest chipset and CPU: Kaby Lake, Z270 with
> i7-7700K.
>
> Out of curiosity I did a kernel benchmark. Comparing darktable performance
> with kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64 and 4.9.0-1-amd64. I use the following com
Darac Marjal wrote:
> If you can understand speech at over a million words per minute, you're
> a VERY impressive individual.
So you all know the answer :)
1. As I said I would ask in the kernel user list.
2. I would look what test.CR2 does and see what functions ae called, so you
can narrow yo
On 05/02/17 10:22, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> $ git diff v3.16..v4.9 | wc
>>13563424 53139667 428195099
> Would still fit on an audio CD. Just 40 minutes to listen. :o)
If you can understand speech at over a million words per minute, you're
a VERY impressive individual.
>
>
> Have a
Hi,
> $ git diff v3.16..v4.9 | wc
>13563424 53139667 428195099
Would still fit on an audio CD. Just 40 minutes to listen. :o)
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
Matthias Bodenbinder [2017-02-05 10:46:23+01] wrote:
> Am 05.02.2017 um 09:49 schrieb deloptes:
>> have a look at the code changes.
>
> Looking at the code changes from 3.16 to 4.9 ?
> Good idea. I will start right now ;-)
Yes. Why not? :-)
$ git diff v3.16..v4.9 | wc
13563424 53139667 4
Am 05.02.2017 um 09:49 schrieb deloptes:
> have a look at the code changes.
Looking at the code changes from 3.16 to 4.9 ?
Good idea. I will start right now ;-)
Matthias
Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Why is that? What am I missing? I can hardly believe that kernel 4.9 is so
> much faster.
I would say efficient and as such faster. Why not ask the kernel people, or
have a look at the code changes.
regards
Hi,
I have upgraded my PC to newest chipset and CPU: Kaby Lake, Z270 with i7-7700K.
Out of curiosity I did a kernel benchmark. Comparing darktable performance with
kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64 and 4.9.0-1-amd64. I use the following command to run
darktable:
darktable-cli test.CR2 test.jpg --core -d pe
hi:
thank you all for the reply.
i found DMA is disabled.. so will enable it first and try..
then as Hugo has suggested to check for the patch.. i will do it..
don't know why kernel image from debain sid did;t work for me.. but
from debain stable it is working and performance is good.
Thank
Paras pradhan wrote:
hi:
i want to build a custom 2.6.x kernel for desktop systems. i
have build kernel 2.6.12-3 successfully , but the performace of
the kernel 2.4.27-1-386 ( from debian sid mirror ) is much
better than kernel 2.6.12-3 that i built from source. for ex:
in kernel 2.4.27-1 if it
Paras pradhan wrote:
hi:
i want to build a custom 2.6.x kernel for desktop systems. i have
build kernel 2.6.12-3 successfully , but the performace of the kernel
2.4.27-1-386 ( from debian sid mirror ) is much better than kernel
2.6.12-3 that i built from source. for ex: in kernel 2.4.27-1 if it
Paras pradhan wrote:
hi:
i want to build a custom 2.6.x kernel for desktop systems. i have
build kernel 2.6.12-3 successfully , but the performace of the kernel
2.4.27-1-386 ( from debian sid mirror ) is much better than kernel
2.6.12-3 that i built from source. for ex: in kernel 2.4.27-1 if i
hi:
i want to build a custom 2.6.x kernel for desktop systems. i have
build kernel 2.6.12-3 successfully , but the performace of the kernel
2.4.27-1-386 ( from debian sid mirror ) is much better than kernel
2.6.12-3 that i built from source. for ex: in kernel 2.4.27-1 if it
takes 5 minutes to bur
15 matches
Mail list logo