On Sun, Jun 20, 1999 at 10:59:14PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> > I upgraded to 2.2.8
>
> Oddly enough, 2.2.8 had filesystem corruption problems (under very high
> loads) as well! 2.2.9 reverted to 2.2.7's filesystem code, which didn't
> have the problem.
I would have used it but wasn't able to get a tar
On Sun, 20 Jun 1999, Werner Reisberger wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 10:57:33AM -0500, Stephen Pitts wrote:
>
> > You shouldn't be running 2.2.3, there are some filesystem corruption
> > problems in the early 2.2.x releases. Upgrade to 2.2.10, that should
> > be better.
>
> I upgraded to 2.2.
On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 10:57:33AM -0500, Stephen Pitts wrote:
> > been written to a log file. Below is an excerpt which I found on the
> > console:
> >
> > unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e7fde95c
> You shouldn't be running 2.2.3, there are some filesystem corruption
>
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 08:39:11PM +0200, Werner Reisberger wrote:
> I am running a debian machine (PC PII 350 MHZ, 128 MB RAM) as an Internet
> server. Today the server crashed the second times after running one week
> without any problems. The crash was caused by a kernel panic. Nothing has
> bee
I am running a debian machine (PC PII 350 MHZ, 128 MB RAM) as an Internet
server. Today the server crashed the second times after running one week
without any problems. The crash was caused by a kernel panic. Nothing has
been written to a log file. Below is an excerpt which I found on the
console:
5 matches
Mail list logo