Re: kernel: make gconfig & gtk problem

At 1148310522 past the epoch, gustavo halperin wrote: > * Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that > * the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed... > * You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and libglade-2.0. snip > but I think that I have all the GTK libraries needed, I h

kernel: make gconfig & gtk problem

Hello List When I try to make the kernel using the gtk menu (make gconfig) y get the next error:   make O=/mnt/data2/root/build/kernel-2.6.10/  gconfig   HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep   HOSTCC  scripts/basic/split-include   HOSTCC  scripts/basic/docproc   GEN    /mnt/data2/root/build/kernel-

Re: Kernel make-kpkg problem And Answer

On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:11:28PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Mark F. Mangano wrote: > >Finally got it working. Turns out there was some problem compiling 2.6.3 > >with gcc-3.3; when I changed the /usr/bin/gcc symlink back to the older > >gcc-2.95, it compiled fine. > > > >Thanks, > >Mark. >

Re: Kernel make-kpkg problem And Answer

Mark F. Mangano wrote: Finally got it working. Turns out there was some problem compiling 2.6.3 with gcc-3.3; when I changed the /usr/bin/gcc symlink back to the older gcc-2.95, it compiled fine. Thanks, Mark. I don't think that was the problem: $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040314

Re: Kernel make-kpkg problem And Answer

Mark F. Mangano wrote: Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 the mental interface of Mark F. Mangano told: Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall: as root: 'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3' 'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3' 'cd /usr/src' 'tar xjvf kerne

Re: Kernel make-kpkg problem

Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 the mental interface of Mark F. Mangano told: Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall: as root: 'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3' 'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3' 'cd /usr/src' 'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2'

Re: Kernel make-kpkg problem

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 the mental interface of Mark F. Mangano told: > Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall: > > as root: > 'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3' > 'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3' > 'cd /usr/src' > 'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2' > 'export PA

Kernel make-kpkg problem

Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall: as root: 'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3' 'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3' 'cd /usr/src' 'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2' 'export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES' 'cp /boot/config-2.6.1.b02082004 /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.3/.c

Kernel make-kpkg problem

Trying to compile 2.6.3 but banging my head against a wall: as root: 'apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.3' 'apt-get install kernel-patch-debian-2.6.3' 'cd /usr/src' 'tar xjvf kernel-source-2.6.3.tar.bz2' 'export PATCH_THE_KERNEL=YES' 'cp /boot/config-2.6.1.b02082004 /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.3/.c

Re: modules after kernel make - can't get new kernel finding its modules

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:37:22PM -, Chris Evans wrote: > On 1 Mar 2004 at 13:28, CW Harris wrote: > > > I thought you were using make-kpkg? It does all this for you when you > > "build" the .deb package. > So I thought: but it isn't! I think that's because it's picking up a > .config that

Re: modules after kernel make - can't get new kernel finding its modules

On 1 Mar 2004 at 13:28, CW Harris wrote: > I thought you were using make-kpkg? It does all this for you when you > "build" the .deb package. So I thought: but it isn't! I think that's because it's picking up a .config that isn't marking the module packages for inclusion > What are the diff's b

Re: modules after kernel make - can't get new kernel finding its modules

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:38:07PM -, Chris Evans wrote: > On 1 Mar 2004 at 18:27, Martin Wood wrote: > > > I think this is exactly where i went wrong the other day. > > > > try adding : > > > > make modules > > make modules_install > > > > and hopefully your modules will show up > > Thank

Re: modules after kernel make - can't get new kernel finding its modules

On 1 Mar 2004 at 18:27, Martin Wood wrote: > I think this is exactly where i went wrong the other day. > > try adding : > > make modules > make modules_install > > and hopefully your modules will show up Thanks Martin. I should have said that I've tried this sequence with and without that, m

Re: modules after kernel make - can't get new kernel finding its modules

Chris Evans wrote: More explicit version of earlier request. I installed 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel from CDROM and then completed installation onto machine from net. I want to compile the RAID code into the kernel so I can boot from a mirrored disc array. I download kernel-source2.4.18. I do: make

modules after kernel make - can't get new kernel finding its modules

More explicit version of earlier request. I installed 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel from CDROM and then completed installation onto machine from net. I want to compile the RAID code into the kernel so I can boot from a mirrored disc array. I download kernel-source2.4.18. I do: make menuconfig make dep

Re: Why doesn't the kernel make like my libncurses?

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:35:23PM -0500, Peter Hutnick wrote: > What's up with this? > > /usr/src/linux# make menuconfig > rm -f include/asm > ( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm) > make -C scripts/lxdialog all > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/scripts/lxdialog' > /usr/bin/ld: cannot f

Re: Why doesn't the kernel make like my libncurses?

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Peter Hutnick wrote: > What's up with this? You need libncurses-dev -- Baloo

Re: Why doesn't the kernel make like my libncurses?

Ref : Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:35:23 AM >>> You must have Ncurses installed in order >>> to use 'make menuconfig' PH> What's up with this? You need the include files : apt-get install libncurses5-dev -- Jean-Christophe Boggio [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Why doesn't the kernel make like my libncurses?

What's up with this? /usr/src/linux# make menuconfig rm -f include/asm ( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm) make -C scripts/lxdialog all make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/scripts/lxdialog' /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lncurses collect2: ld returned 1 exit status -e >> Unable to find the Ncur

Re: how to edit the kernel....make menuconfig???

On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 12:52:17PM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote: > ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > If these Debian patches are so great, why aren't they in the official > > > kernel source? > > > > > > > Because the patches didn't exist when 2.2 was released. That is the > > nature of

Re: how to edit the kernel....make menuconfig???

Well, OK.. I guess *somebody* has to patch the kernels, so it may as well be the people who "sell" them, i.e. distribution "vendors" like Debian and RedHat.. as long as the patches aren't forking the kernel source tree, official or effective, I'm happy - chris On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Shawn Yarbr

Re: how to edit the kernel....make menuconfig???

Krzys Majewski wrote: > > OK, so these are official kernel.org patches then? Or something else? > Here is the README.Debian file from kernel-source-2.2.18pre21: (yes it looks like somebody forgot to update the title) kernel-source-2.2.17 for DEBIAN --- These patch

Re: how to edit the kernel....make menuconfig???

ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If these Debian patches are so great, why aren't they in the official > > kernel source? > > > > Because the patches didn't exist when 2.2 was released. That is the > nature of a patch. For the most part patches are created to fix > bugs that were unknown

Re: how to edit the kernel....make menuconfig???

On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 08:53:46AM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote: > On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Shawn Yarbrough wrote: > > > Use the 'kernel-source' packages and you will get extra features and > > bugfixes patched in by Debian which are not in stock Linux. For example > > 'kernel-source-2.2.18pre21'. Wh

Re: how to edit the kernel....make menuconfig???

On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Shawn Yarbrough wrote: > Use the 'kernel-source' packages and you will get extra features and > bugfixes patched in by Debian which are not in stock Linux. For example > 'kernel-source-2.2.18pre21'. When installed the archive gets put into Is this anything like RedHat's cu

Re: how to edit the kernel....make menuconfig???

Krzys Majewski wrote: > > There is an official debian way to recompile kernels, but I don't > bother.. download the kernel source from debian.org or kernel.org Use the 'kernel-source' packages and you will get extra features and bugfixes patched in by Debian which are not in stock Linux

Re: how to edit the kernel....make menuconfig???

There is an official debian way to recompile kernels, but I don't bother.. download the kernel source from debian.org or kernel.org (avoid minor versions which are not divisible by 2, like 2.1.* or 2.3.*) read the README in /usr/src/linux, and you're go. Basically make menuconfig ma

Re: how to edit the kernel....make menuconfig???

From: Mike Egglestone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm having a tough time finding info on how to > edit the kernel so I can add "transparent_proxy" support. > Isn't there some utility to do this? You want to recompile the kernel with transparent_proxy? If so, see http://www.chowells.uklinux.net/files

how to edit the kernel....make menuconfig???

Hi all... I'm having a tough time finding info on how to edit the kernel so I can add "transparent_proxy" support. Isn't there some utility to do this? I'm running potato If someone could help me out.. that would be great!! Thanks Mike

Re: kernel make-config not recognising new drivers

Pete Meyer wrote: > I've got the source for a network card driver, and am trying to compile it into my kernel. I put the code into kernelsource/drivers/net. Unfortunately, make config does not recogise that it's there (neither does make menuconfig). Is there a way I can get the configuration

kernel make-config not recognising new drivers

I've got the source for a network card driver, and am trying to compile it into my kernel. I put the code into kernelsource/drivers/net. Unfortunately, make config does not recogise that it's there (neither does make menuconfig). Is there a way I can get the configuration scripts to recognise

Re: kernel make

Harry ten Berge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > If you install the kernel sources (2.2.15), unpack them and want to make the > kernel, where can you get the configuration of the base system kernel? I > mean, if I run 'make menuconfig' there is a '.config', but the resulting > kernel is definitely not

kernel make

If you install the kernel sources (2.2.15), unpack them and want to make the kernel, where can you get the configuration of the base system kernel? I mean, if I run 'make menuconfig' there is a '.config', but the resulting kernel is definitely not the same as the original after fresh installation.

Re: Kernel, make menuconfig

Thanks Martin, it is working now Martin Fluch wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > > > I am trying to recompile the kernel according to KERNEL HOWTO, when I do > > make menuconfig it complains that there is no rule. I checked the info > >

Re: Kernel, make menuconfig

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > I am trying to recompile the kernel according to KERNEL HOWTO, when I do > make menuconfig it complains that there is no rule. I checked the info > make, it tells me that rule is a file that instructs about changes

Kernel, make menuconfig

I am trying to recompile the kernel according to KERNEL HOWTO, when I do make menuconfig it complains that there is no rule. I checked the info make, it tells me that rule is a file that instructs about changes to be made. The same happens with xconfig. This is vague for me, I have not any good und

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 07:41:20PM -0400, Salman Ahmed wrote: > One other thing: are there any problems compiling 2.2.12 or 2.2.13 with gcc > 2.95.2 ?? I read today in the 2.2.13 kernel's release notes at > that gcc 2.95 should > not be used to c

ncurses: kernel make menuconfig complains

Package: ncurses Version: N/A Severity: normal I got the following lines when trying to make menu config. How can I solve it ? Aren't dependency problems supposed to be fixed automatically by dpkg ? There seems to be a problem with the lxdialog companion utility which is built prior to running

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

Salman Ahmed wrote: > > > "ekw" == eric k wolven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ekw> Ingo: Get the "kernel package" (dselect or apt-get) & install > > ekw> unpack kernel-source. etc. > > ekw> make menuconfig or xconfig > > ekw> then: make-kpkg clean > > ekw> then: m

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

On 20/10/99 Brad wrote: > Has anyone tried compiling the recent kernels (ie 2.2.10-12) with gcc 2.95 > or 2.95.2 ? Any problems ?? I've done it, no problems here. YMMV. with 2.2.12 you had to add -fno-scrict-aliasing to the Makefile CC arguments, I am told that 2.2.13 will detect gcc 2.95 an

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Salman Ahmed wrote: [[[SNIP quoted details of using make-kpkg]]] > > Some people have mentioned earlier making another target as well : modules > (or modules_install). Is that necessary ? Do you mean 'modules-image'? That's used if you hav

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

Sal: The kernel pkg script makes the modules. The dpkg -i kernel-image (etc) installs the modules--and warns you to mv any old modules. No make_install_modules is necessary with the kpg script. I tried to install the 2.3.4 kernel from ftp.kernel.org. My system booted but fluttered, so I stuc

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

Ingo: Get the "kernel package" (dselect or apt-get) & install unpack kernel-source. etc. make menuconfig or xconfig then: make-kpkg clean then: make kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image then: cd /usr/src then: dpkg -i kernel-image(etc).deb Everything will install. No muss, no fuss Got

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 01:12:00PM +0200, Ingo Reimann wrote: > Hi, > > can anybody tell me, what do do, if i don't want to do the complicated > debain way to install a new kernel? > > in former times (SuSE <=6.1 ) i got the sources, and did the > make menuconfig > make dep && make clean && make

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 04:32:38PM +0300, Martin Fluch wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Ingo Reimann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > can anybody tell me, what do do, if i don't want to do the complicated > > debain way to install a new kernel? > > > > in former times (SuSE <=6.1 ) i got the sources, and d

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Ingo Reimann wrote: > Hi, > > can anybody tell me, what do do, if i don't want to do the complicated > debain way to install a new kernel? > > in former times (SuSE <=6.1 ) i got the sources, and did the > make menuconfig > make dep && make clean && make bzLilo && make modu

Re: New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

Hi > make menuconfig > make dep && make clean && make bzLilo && make modules && make_modules_install It should be 'make bzImage' -gnana

New Kernel: make-kpkg vs. make bzLilo

Hi, can anybody tell me, what do do, if i don't want to do the complicated debain way to install a new kernel? in former times (SuSE <=6.1 ) i got the sources, and did the make menuconfig make dep && make clean && make bzLilo && make modules && make_modules_install and that it was. Now with de

Re: Kernel: Make config errors (First time compile)

Hi, I think you are installing the old hamm (2.0) package. The current package is slink (2.1). Nothing wrong with the old ones just a reminder. If you prepared to use kernel-package, it depends on perl, dpkg, dpkg-dev, fileutils, libc6-dev and if you install ncurses3.4 may be th

Re: Kernel: Make config errors (First time compile)

This is what I've got installed (and think I need): bin86 0.13.0-4 binutils 2.9.1-0.2 gcc 2.7.2.3-4.8 kernel-package 4.11 kernel-source-2 2.0.34-4 libc6-dev 2.0.7t-1 make 3.76.1-8 ncurses3.4 1.9.9g-8.8 patch 2.5-2 but I thought the kernel-package was required to install with kpkg, I'll upgrade th

Re: Kernel: Make config errors (First time compile)

Hi, Have you installed all the packages mentioned according to the dependencies and recommends of kernel-package 6.05 and don't forget the bin86 package as well on intel x86 platforms. Cheers. Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I've just started to try compiling

Kernel: Make config errors (First time compile)

Hi, I've just started to try compiling kernel 2.0.35 on a Debian 2.0 (2.0.34) machine, and just tried `make config' and got the following error(s): consolemap.c:303: uni_hash.tbl: No such file or directory consolemap.c: In function `con_set_default_unimap': consolemap.c:404: `dfont_unitable' unde

Re: Kernel make config

Hi, kernel-package dcontains what I think are the official config files in /usr/lib/kernel-package/Config, and those get used if you do not already have a .config file. I think you can run make-kpkg kernel_image, hit control C after a minute or so, and voila, you should have a proper .

Re: Kernel make config

On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 03:53:08PM +1000, Peter Eades wrote: > So that explains why a can never get the patches to apply cleanly does > it and I just thought I was stupid. In that case shouldnt the debian > pakages include patches that will alow an upgard from say 2.0.5 to 2.0.6 > without having to

Re: Kernel make config

Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 09:17:18AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: > > > Is it possible that when compiling a custom kernel the make utility ie > > > xconfig or menuconfig could be made to offer the options that were used > > > for the default kernel that came with the system

Re: Kernel make config

On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 09:17:18AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: > > Is it possible that when compiling a custom kernel the make utility ie > > xconfig or menuconfig could be made to offer the options that were used > > for the default kernel that came with the system? I note that tere is an > Make a

Re: Kernel make config

> Is it possible that when compiling a custom kernel the make utility ie > xconfig or menuconfig could be made to offer the options that were used > for the default kernel that came with the system? I note that tere is an Make a backup of the .config file (in /usr/src/linux) before running xconfig

Kernel make config

Is it possible that when compiling a custom kernel the make utility ie xconfig or menuconfig could be made to offer the options that were used for the default kernel that came with the system? I note that tere is an option for reading a configuration file so I guess al I need is that file. Anyone n

Re: Kernel "make config"

On Jun 25, Lalovic, Drazen wrote > I have just installed debian 1.3 and downloaded some packages from the > ftp site. Since I want to use it as a firewall I have to recompile > kernel to enable IP forwarding. > How can I do it? How to configure second Ethernet card. Hi, install Package: doc-linux

Kernel "make config"

I have just installed debian 1.3 and downloaded some packages from the ftp site. Since I want to use it as a firewall I have to recompile kernel to enable IP forwarding. How can I do it? How to configure second Ethernet card. Thank you, Drazen -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the

Re: kernel make deb fails

[moved to debian-user@lists.debian.org; you were using debian-changes!] Fundamental writes: > I have installed the kernel source, and when i get to teh stage where i > should make deb ; make clean i get the following error, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/src/linux]: make deb > make: *** No rule to