Hello
Where I can find any information about kernel installation on BananaPi?
I mean original kernel from kernel.org.
I tryed to configure, build and install kernel, but it doesn't work.
I did:
make menuconfig (I loaded config from running kerrnel)
make
make moduless_install in
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 12:00:58 -0400 (EDT), Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> ...
>> I have a document on my web page which addresses the subject of
>> creating a custom kernel for Debian.
>> ...
>> I welcome all comments.
>
> What about this:
> http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOf
On Sun, Apr 04 2010, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 14:19:08 -0400 (EDT), Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 04 2010, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
>>>
>>> for the longest time I have downloaded the kernel tarball and built
>>> outside of debian. however I'd like to use the debian nvi
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 14:19:08 -0400 (EDT), Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04 2010, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
>>
>> for the longest time I have downloaded the kernel tarball and built
>> outside of debian. however I'd like to use the debian nvidia packages,
>> so I'm trying to build the kernel
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 13:04:34 -0400 (EDT), Brian D. wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 11:00:58 -0500 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> Stephen Powell wrote:
>>>
>>> I welcome all comments. Am I full of excrement? Is there something
>>> missing? What can be improved? I am especially interested in
>>> hearing f
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 20:34:13 -0400 (EDT), Paul E Condon wrote:
> One of the reasons for boot
> problems in general is the lack of stablity in the names assigned
> by the kernel to SCSI devices. Lilo seems to require that you know
> at lilo-update time what the kernel will think the name of a
> devi
On Sun, Apr 04 2010, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 11:00:58 -0500
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> for the longest time I have downloaded the kernel tarball and built
> outside of debian. however I'd like to use the debian nvidia packages,
> so I'm trying to build the kernel in th
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 11:00:58 -0500
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
> > I welcome all comments. Am I full of excrement? Is there something
> > missing? What can be improved? I am especially interested in
> > hearing from lilo users.
lilo user here. works great. The _only_ go
steps,
"Step 10: Customize the Kernel Installation Process", is of
interest even to people who only run stock kernels, especially
if they run lilo. In response to recent problem reports, I have
totally re-written that Step and updated the document on the Internet
just today. (If you have loo
ject of
> creating a custom kernel for Debian. But one of the steps,
> "Step 10: Customize the Kernel Installation Process", is of
> interest even to people who only run stock kernels, especially
> if they run lilo. In response to recent problem reports, I have
> totally
omize the Kernel Installation Process", is of
interest even to people who only run stock kernels, especially
if they run lilo. In response to recent problem reports, I have
totally re-written that Step and updated the document on the Internet
just today. (If you have looked at the page before,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:43:12AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >And what do dpkg and aptitude think now?
>
> They still showed the file, it wasn't forgotten as the previous reply stated
> it would be. For some reason, it did finally go ahead and get through the
> installation. Not sure w
Rook asked:
>> Hmmm. Dpkg and aptitude still knew that it was installed and in a bad way,
>> but after removing the files (I went further and did 'rm
>> linux-image-2.6.26.*)
> the system did finish the installation. So, many thanks. You saved me a lot
> of headache.
>And what do dpkg and apti
Sven Joachim stated in a not very friendly tone:
>> run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/update-initramfs
>From the existence of this file I conclude that you have initramfs-tools
>0.92k installed, which is known to be broken.
>> Cannot delete /boot/initrd.img-2.6.26, doesn't exist.
>That
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 09:37:50AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> That's bug #499270. My advice to you: don't run sid if you cannot
>> figure out such things on your own.
>>
>
> That's rather severe. OP asked and you provided info and showed me
> something I did not know in the process.
>
> I
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-09-18 00:52 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/update-initramfs
From the existence of this file I conclude that you have initramfs-tools
0.92k installed, which is known to be broken.
Cannot delete /boot/initrd.img-2.6.26,
On 2008-09-18 00:52 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/update-initramfs
>From the existence of this file I conclude that you have initramfs-tools
0.92k installed, which is known to be broken.
> Cannot delete /boot/initrd.img-2.6.26, doesn't exist.
That's
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:13:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Please try to put margin limits on your messages. They're easier to read
> >that way, and you look less like an Outlook user.
>
> Sorry, using webmail because I'm not on my main computer
>
> >If you're NOT using an initramfs
>Please try to put margin limits on your messages. They're easier to read
>that way, and you look less like an Outlook user.
Sorry, using webmail because I'm not on my main computer
>If you're NOT using an initramfs, rip out initramfs-tools, then try to
>remove the foobarred packag
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:52:56PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If I could get update-initramfs to not run on the post-removal script, or
> if I could just get the package management system to forget that this
> one package is installed
Please try to put margin limits on your messag
I am not subscribed to the list, so please CC me! Thanks.
Hm. I've never had this issue before in all the time I have used Debian,
which is since the late 90's. I've custom compiled kernels for years, and yes I
now use kernel-package, and never had an installation BORK on me! I was
creating
kristian kvilekval a écrit :
>Background:
>Having discovered that my cdrom disappeared a while ago,
>I tracked down that the loading order of modules
>determines whether I have a Cdrom device or not.
>Specifically I need to force
>
>ide-core
>cdrom
>ide-cd
>ide-disk
>ide-generic
>
>to load before
Background:
Having discovered that my cdrom disappeared a while ago,
I tracked down that the loading order of modules
determines whether I have a Cdrom device or not.
Specifically I need to force
ide-core
cdrom
ide-cd
ide-disk
ide-generic
to load before any scsi drivers load specifically by
pla
Roberto C. Sanchez said:
>
> The last time I had that problem I had compiled the kernel on a machine
> that ran a different version of GCC from the target machine. Is that
> the case with your setup?
Nope, I compiled the kernel on the machine I'm going to install it on. I'm
running the testing f
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 08:35:25PM -0500, Josh Battles wrote:
> I've been putting off the 2.6 kernel upgrade on my main workstation for a
> while because I wanted to learn the debian method to compilation/installation
> (and because it's been rock solid stable running the 2.4 kernel) so I gave it
>
I've been putting off the 2.6 kernel upgrade on my main workstation for a
while because I wanted to learn the debian method to compilation/installation
(and because it's been rock solid stable running the 2.4 kernel) so I gave it
a shot tonight after reading up on how this whole process works, and
Cool ! this works.
Thanks one more for help.
Regards,
Eugen.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for help, but I prefer more classical / general kernel build
process , because at home I use Debian, at work Red Hat , at
school Suse
The point is not to get loosed in distro specific stuff :(
Best wishes ,
Eugen.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
--- "M. Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> jenea wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > When I type :
> >
> > >$ mkinitrd -k vmlinux-2.6.10 -i initrd-2.6.10
> >
> > I get the same result ( mknitrd help ).
> > Could somebody help me with this stuff ?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Eugen.
> >
> >
Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 07:43 schrieb jenea:
> None of them works on my system ;I have mkinitrd v 1.201 , my
> system's kernel is v 2.4.27-1-386 ; I use debian distro.
>
> When I type ( I try to build 2.6.10 kernel ) :
> > mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.6.10.img 2.6.10
>
> it gives me mkinitrd help ,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jenea wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I tried to build a new kernel and install it following the steps
> described in
> http://www.digitalhermit.com/linux/Kernel-Build-HOWTO.html
> All goes ok till I get to
>
> " To create the initrd, do the following:
>
>
Hi!
I tried to build a new kernel and install it following the steps
described in
http://www.digitalhermit.com/linux/Kernel-Build-HOWTO.html
All goes ok till I get to
" To create the initrd, do the following:
$ mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.6.0.img 2.6.0
"
they also says
"
Some
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
On Thursday 06 January 2005 21:20, Joe wrote:
Is it a "defect" that requires the noapic option?
I think so. I don't believe a mere absence of a feature should stop a
kernel booting, particularly a Knoppix one. I think it must be
On Thursday 06 January 2005 21:20, Joe wrote:
>>Is it a "defect" that requires the noapic option?
>>
>>
> I think so. I don't believe a mere absence of a feature should stop a
> kernel booting, particularly a Knoppix one. I think it must be a
> hardware bug.
>
> In fact a quick Google on 'k7s8x n
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 20:40, Joe wrote:
The motherboard is an ASRock K7S8X. (I don't know what chips are on
it.)
I didn't see the beginning of this. I have one of these and I've yet
to see any Linux boot without noapic. In
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 20:40, Joe wrote:
>>The motherboard is an ASRock K7S8X. (I don't know what chips are on
>>it.)
> I didn't see the beginning of this. I have one of these and I've yet
> to see any Linux boot without noapic. Including Knoppix, and Woody on
> 2.4.18, and the current Sarge
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 00:10, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Thanks. I added that to the append="..." in /etc/lilo.conf and it
fixed the problem.
Just out of curiosity, why did this become necessary (for my hardware
at least) bet
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 00:10, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
>> Thanks. I added that to the append="..." in /etc/lilo.conf and it
>> fixed the problem.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, why did this become necessary (for my hardware
>> at least) between the 2.4.23 and 2.4.26 kernels?
>>
> What motherbo
Adam Funk wrote:
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running Debian testing on an Athlon 1100 and currently using the
2.4.23-1-386 kernel. I've tried to upgrade to the following packages:
kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386
kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386
kernel-image-2.
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm running Debian testing on an Athlon 1100 and currently using the
> > 2.4.23-1-386 kernel. I've tried to upgrade to the following packages:
> >
> > kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386
> > kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386
> > kerne
13 oktober 2004 11:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New kernel...sockets problems, sshd problem,...general problems
with 2.6.8.1 kernel installation and SATA
Hello,
I'm using a DELL 470 workstation with a XEON proc, 1GB RAM and 2 SATA
disks.
I installed sarge last week on it, everything w
Hello,
I'm using a DELL 470 workstation with a XEON proc, 1GB RAM and 2 SATA
disks.
I installed sarge last week on it, everything works (sshd, ftp, X11
(gnome), DHCP, GPM).
Now i downloaded kernel 2.6.8.1 and configured it with following
settings:
SCSI, libata, sound, DHCP, XEON architecture, U
Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running Debian testing on an Athlon 1100 and currently using the
> 2.4.23-1-386 kernel. I've tried to upgrade to the following packages:
>
> kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386
> kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386
> kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7
>
> and they all get stuck on "
On Friday 14 May 2004 10:41 am, Adam Funk wrote:
> On Friday 14 May 2004 17:10, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> > What motherboard do you have?
>
> ASRock K7S8X
>
> > Are you loading the module for your
> > IDE chipset?
>
> Here's some info about the kernel that works. AFAIK all the kernels
> I've tried
On Friday 14 May 2004 17:10, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> What motherboard do you have?
ASRock K7S8X
> Are you loading the module for your
> IDE chipset?
Here's some info about the kernel that works. AFAIK all the kernels
I've tried would use the same modules.conf file, so I can't see why
changi
Adam Funk wrote:
I'm running Debian testing on an Athlon 1100 and currently using the
2.4.23-1-386 kernel. I've tried to upgrade to the following packages:
kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386
kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386
kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7
and they all get stuck on "hda: lost interrupt" while trying to b
I'm running Debian testing on an Athlon 1100 and currently using the
2.4.23-1-386 kernel. I've tried to upgrade to the following packages:
kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386
kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386
kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7
and they all get stuck on "hda: lost interrupt" while trying to boot. I
thought
The actual PROBLEM I wanted help with was with having installed the basic
stable gnu-linux system from debian WITH a compact kernel image from
ANOTHER part of the site [did not seem to BE one where I needed it!) ,
which seems to have ONE bad fit:
the kernel seems to periodically run a process that
If you look for "support" on the gnu site you are referred to mailing
lists, but neither the gnu site nor this one features an easily findable
list for newbies suffering from kernel/basic system mismatches.
So first, I would like to suggest that someone should rederrange one or
both of these sit
Dear Joost and Manoj,
thanks a lot for your help !
Joost,
unfortunately installing kernel and modules with the same dpkg
command leads to the same error messages and dpkg bailout.
best regards,
nicola
Manoj,
There is a point I really do not understand:
I know for sure I am not downgrading the k
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Frans Schreuder wrote:
> > Sorry if it was posted before, but my DynDNS account just went out and
I'm afraid I just might have missed something
>
> Don't post with a flaky From: address. Just common courtesy to the
> other net.users.
I appollogize
Fl
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:12:33AM +0200, Frans Schreuder wrote:
> Sorry if it was posted before, but my DynDNS account just went out and I'm
> afraid I just might have missed something
Don't post with a flaky From: address. Just common courtesy to the
other net.users.
And you're giving us fr
Sorry if it was posted before, but my DynDNS
account just went out and I'm afraid I just might have missed
something
Hai,
Having a hard time figuring this out.
Previous subject was Proliant 1000 pains in the
butt, but that seemed to scare you people:-)
I got myself a working kernel
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 08:02:47AM +0200, Frans Schreuder wrote:
> Having a hard time figuring this out.
>
> Previous subject was Proliant 1000 pains in the butt, but that seemed to
> scare you people:-)
Maybe the problem is mostly that your return address bounces..
host hp14.ath.cx
hp14.at
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 08:02:47AM +0200, Frans Schreuder wrote:
> Hai,
>
> Having a hard time figuring this out.
>
> Previous subject was Proliant 1000 pains in the butt, but that seemed to
> scare you people:-)
>
> I got myself a working kernel for the CompraQ proliant 1000 in the form of a
Hai,
Having a hard time figuring this out.
Previous subject was Proliant 1000 pains in the
butt, but that seemed to scare you people:-)
I got myself a working kernel for the CompraQ
proliant 1000 in the form of a bzImage.
I copied it to a standard rescueflop renaming it to
linux.
Hintin
>>"Nicola" == Nicola Botta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That kernel is actually creating the problem. Firstly, your
new kernel has a version tht is lower than the kernel that is
installed: that creates the first error about downgrades.
Then you have pcmcia-modules installed, a
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 03:11:49PM +0200, Nicola Botta wrote:
> at installation, I get
>
> lt28:/usr/src# dpkg -i kernel-image-2.2.18pre21_lt28.2_i386.deb
[..]
> conflicting packages - not installing kernel-image-2.2.18pre21
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> kernel-image-2.2.18pre21
I have successfully compiled a kernel using the make-kpkg package and
following
the instructions provided in /usr/share/kernel-package/README* -- many
thanks,
Manoj ! -- :
make xconfig
make-kpkg clean
make-kpkg --revision lt28.2 kernel_image
make-kpkg --revision lt28.2 modules_image
at installati
I biuld a 2.2.1 kernel.
Attempting a: make zdisk failed until I changed the floppy device from
/dev/fd0 to /dev/rfd0. Still the machine does not see it as a "bootable"
floppy.
Attempted a: make vmlinux and ended up with an unbootable machine.
It tells me that the boot device 8, 1 cannot be mounted
Jim Worthington scripsit:
|1)Boot Message - I get the following message when booting:
|
|
|Oct 8 17:10:10 hercules syslogd 1.3-0#6: restart.
|Oct 8 17:10:11 hercules kernel: Cannot find map file.
|
|What is a map file?
Map of kernel symbols (= functions and external variables)
|Where is it su
1)Boot Message - I get the following message when booting:
Oct 8 17:10:10 hercules syslogd 1.3-0#6: restart.
Oct 8 17:10:11 hercules kernel: Cannot find map file.
What is a map file?
Where is it supposed to be?
How do I get rid of the message?
2) Where is the /boot/psdatabase file used?
I
62 matches
Mail list logo
