On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:19:29 -0500
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Greg,
> It is a Safe Choice, that can be tweaked later one. To be honest,
> unless you are really using these K7 or 686 instruction sets to the
> fullest a 486 kernel will be nearly 99.99% as fast and work just as
>
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 16:23 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I too, use an AMD processor, and have a -486 kernel installed. This
> was selected by the installer, not by me.
>
> The question still remains though; Why does the installer select a
> -486 kernel when a -k7 one would be mor
Hello All,
I too, use an AMD processor, and have a -486 kernel installed. This
was selected by the installer, not by me.
The question still remains though; Why does the installer select a
-486 kernel when a -k7 one would be more appropriate?
I'm confused by this.
But only slightly. :-)
--
Dominique Dumont wrote:
Peter Hillier-Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If I might pose a supplementary question, can anyone suggest why the
default kernel on my AMD Athlon 3200+ is a '-486' version whereas on a
Pentium III it's a '-686' version: this is directly from system
installation. My un
Peter Hillier-Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I might pose a supplementary question, can anyone suggest why the
> default kernel on my AMD Athlon 3200+ is a '-486' version whereas on a
> Pentium III it's a '-686' version: this is directly from system
> installation. My understanding of the
5 matches
Mail list logo
