Hi,
I've had a few problems trying to build a fresh 2.6.10 or 2.6.11
kernel. Nothing fancy. With gcc-4.0 I get tons of warnings, and
eventually it barfs when it gets to:
> CC drivers/eisa/eisa-bus.o
>cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>drivers/eisa/eisa-bus.c:421: warning: pointer targets
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 12:51:17PM -0500, John Foster wrote:
> If I put the CONCURRENCY_LEVEL := 2 in my root environment variable will
> it be useful in allowing all of my compiled applications to run with
> maximum efficiency on my dual processor system?
No, it will only affect the (one-time) co
Steve Kowalik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 02:42:20PM -0500, S.Salman Ahmed uttered:
> >
> > Is there any way to pass the "-j " option to make when building
> > kernels using make-kpkg ?
> >
> Read the README for kernel-package.
> Make a .kernel-pkg.conf in ~ as the user you compile it as.
>
S.Salman Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any way to pass the "-j " option to make when building
> kernels using make-kpkg ?
Yes. See kernel-pkg.conf(5) for details.
--
Leonard Stiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 02:42:20PM -0500, S . Salman Ahmed wrote:
>
> Is there any way to pass the "-j " option to make when building
> kernels using make-kpkg ?
RTFM. 'man kernel-pkg.conf' and search for CONCURRENCY_LEVEL or just
'-j'.
> I am hoping that by passing the "-j" option to make, ker
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 02:42:20PM -0500, S.Salman Ahmed uttered:
>
> Is there any way to pass the "-j " option to make when building
> kernels using make-kpkg ?
>
Read the README for kernel-package.
Make a .kernel-pkg.conf in ~ as the user you compile it as.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep -i concurr
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:44:51PM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote:
> now do a `make clean` (just to get rid of the modules, mostly) and
make-kpkg clean
> re-do steps 1-3 for the second machine and the third and...
It will complain if you use machines' hostnames in
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:17:14PM +0200, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Bob Nielsen (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:42:23AM -0700):
> > True, but you can/should configure and compile separately for each
> > destination architecture, optimizing appropriately.
>
> so yes, the argument that my athlon (thunde
also sprach Robert Waldner (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:44:51PM +0200):
> now do a `make clean` (just to get rid of the modules, mostly) and
> re-do steps 1-3 for the second machine and the third and...
>
> when you want to re-do for the first machine, just move the appropriate
> .config back, and
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:28:04 +0200, MaD dUCK writes:
>also sprach Robert Waldner (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:20:41PM +0200):
>> you don´t need to maintain seperate trees of the whole source. just
>> `make (menu|x|)config`, then backup the .config-file. that´s where the
>> information you entered/c
also sprach Robert Waldner (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:20:41PM +0200):
> you don´t need to maintain seperate trees of the whole source. just
> `make (menu|x|)config`, then backup the .config-file. that´s where the
> information you entered/chose is kept.
i understand... but when i change the .conf
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:17:14 +0200, MaD dUCK writes:
>also sprach Bob Nielsen (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:42:23AM -0700):
>> True, but you can/should configure and compile separately for each
>> destination architecture, optimizing appropriately.
>
>so yes, the argument that my athlon (thunderbird act
also sprach Bob Nielsen (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:42:23AM -0700):
> True, but you can/should configure and compile separately for each
> destination architecture, optimizing appropriately.
so yes, the argument that my athlon (thunderbird actually) will
outperform the others still holds. but i'd need
also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:42:37PM -0500):
> I fail to see why you think compiling a kernel on an Athlon, but
> optimising for a 486 cos you're installing on a 486 is a problem.
that's what i am doing btw. and sorry, i wasn't possibly thinking
about multiple .debs, just th
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:34:25PM +0200, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:01:13AM -0500):
> > Well, for one thing, you can compile kernels on your 1GHz Athlon
> > instead of your old 486 :) Since kernel-package creates a package, it
> > can be installed anywhe
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:19:49PM -0400, David L. Craig wrote:
> Sean Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > zless /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/Rationale
>
> I haven't figured out if kernel-package includes the
> patches Herbert puts into the kernel-source .debs.
> I tried to patch in 2.4.5-ac
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:34:25PM +0200, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:01:13AM -0500):
> > Well, for one thing, you can compile kernels on your 1GHz Athlon
> > instead of your old 486 :) Since kernel-package creates a package, it
> > can be installed anywhe
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:34:25PM +0200, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:01:13AM -0500):
> > Well, for one thing, you can compile kernels on your 1GHz Athlon
> > instead of your old 486 :) Since kernel-package creates a package, it
> > can be installed anywhe
27;s cutting edge, i do a whole lot of kernel compiles.
>
> in the past, i have always used .debs unless a software was too old or
> not available, in which case i beat the tarball around and installed
> into /usr/local. by now, i do it the "debian way," and use
> dpkg-bui
Sean Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> zless /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/Rationale
I haven't figured out if kernel-package includes the
patches Herbert puts into the kernel-source .debs.
I tried to patch in 2.4.5-ac17 yesterday over
kernel-source-2.4.5 and ran afoul of some conflicts.
Would s
also sprach Sean Morgan (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:05:19PM -0400):
> zless /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/Rationale
exaclty what i wanted. thanks!
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
your fly might be open
also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:01:13AM -0500):
> Well, for one thing, you can compile kernels on your 1GHz Athlon
> instead of your old 486 :) Since kernel-package creates a package, it
> can be installed anywhere.
but i usually choose the appropriate kernel architecture duri
s want to have at least one
> machine that's cutting edge, i do a whole lot of kernel compiles.
>
> in the past, i have always used .debs unless a software was too old or
> not available, in which case i beat the tarball around and installed
> into /usr/local. by now, i do it the
27;s cutting edge, i do a whole lot of kernel compiles.
>
> in the past, i have always used .debs unless a software was too old or
> not available, in which case i beat the tarball around and installed
> into /usr/local. by now, i do it the "debian way," and use
> dpkg-bui
d since i always want to have at least one
> machine that's cutting edge, i do a whole lot of kernel compiles.
>
> in the past, i have always used .debs unless a software was too old or
> not available, in which case i beat the tarball around and installed
> into /usr/local. by
i love debian. seriously, apt is a work of genius and the entire
system is exactly how i want it - unlike SuSE or RedHat. since i do a
fair bit of developing and since i always want to have at least one
machine that's cutting edge, i do a whole lot of kernel compiles.
in the past, i have a
>
> I installed slink on my laptop, and compiled my kernel with
> everything I need. Now when I try loading my PCMCIA netcard, I
> get some unresolved symbols. I compiled the ne.o net driver as a
> module, and that reduced the number of symbols not found, but are
> still complaining about 2 fu
I installed slink on my laptop, and compiled my kernel with
everything I need. Now when I try loading my PCMCIA netcard, I
get some unresolved symbols. I compiled the ne.o net driver as a
module, and that reduced the number of symbols not found, but are
still complaining about 2 functions it ca
28 matches
Mail list logo
