Re: kernel 2.6 and amd K6-II

celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > I believe that the k6 is NOT a 686. I think you're right : someone on l.d.u.french has explained to me it's more than a 586 (586 + MMX if i did'nt misunderstand) but not a 686. I also was told it is possible to compile the kernel with : CONFIG_MK6

Re: kernel 2.6 and amd K6-II

On 11/5/06, Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Second i said myself : "Dummy, amd k6-II is not a 486 processor but a 686". So i got linux-image-2.6-686. It's not written on it that it works on AMD K6-II. But i tried and ... nothing append. After loading I believe that the k6 is NOT a 68

Re: kernel 2.6 and amd K6-II

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:55:11AM +0100, Bernard Adrian wrote: > > Till yesterday, i was using linux-image-2.4-27-2-k6 on my amd k6-II > (64 Mo RAM). > > I decided to upgrade the kernel. In a first time i tried > linux-image-2.6-486. No problem. Really. > > Second i said myself : "Dummy, amd k6

kernel 2.6 and amd K6-II

Hi all, Till yesterday, i was using linux-image-2.4-27-2-k6 on my amd k6-II (64 Mo RAM). I decided to upgrade the kernel. In a first time i tried linux-image-2.6-486. No problem. Really. Second i said myself : "Dummy, amd k6-II is not a 486 processor but a 686". So i got linux-image-2.6-686. It'