Re: kernel-source2.0.33

1998-03-24 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, There is a problem if you are re-installing a kernel with the same version number (and not using Flavours ;-). From the kernel-package README file: __ Now, there is a caveat: If you already have kernel 2.0.29 install

Re: kernel-source2.0.33

1998-03-24 Thread John Maheu
On Tue, 24 Mar 1998, W Paul Mills wrote: > On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, John Maheu wrote: > > > > > I've had some trouble with mounting iso9660 and msdos type fs with kernel > > 2.0.33. The kernel complains that these fs types are not supported. > > However, they were built as modules and exist in /lib/

Re: kernel-source2.0.33

1998-03-24 Thread W Paul Mills
On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, John Maheu wrote: > > I've had some trouble with mounting iso9660 and msdos type fs with kernel > 2.0.33. The kernel complains that these fs types are not supported. > However, they were built as modules and exist in /lib/modules/2.0.33/ This sounds like a problem with the n

Re: kernel-source2.0.33

1998-03-15 Thread Will Lowe
On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, John Maheu wrote: > I've had some trouble with mounting iso9660 and msdos type fs with kernel > 2.0.33. The kernel complains that these fs types are not supported. > However, they were built as modules and exist in /lib/modules/2.0.33/ is there a modules.dep file in that direc

kernel-source2.0.33

1998-03-15 Thread John Maheu
I've had some trouble with mounting iso9660 and msdos type fs with kernel 2.0.33. The kernel complains that these fs types are not supported. However, they were built as modules and exist in /lib/modules/2.0.33/ I saw a bug report about needing to include NLS support in the kernel to solve this p