Re: Going crazy with sound. No soundcore.o in kernel-source.2.4.21 distributed in SID

2003-10-09 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 05:38:18PM -0700, A R wrote: [quoted from subject] | No soundcore.o in kernel-source.2.4.21 distributed in SID Naturally. Object files (.o) are not provided in source packages. They are found in binary packages only. [...] | When I compiled my kernel image, I made sure

Going crazy with sound. No soundcore.o in kernel-source.2.4.21 distributed in SID

2003-10-08 Thread A R
d:~# uname -a Linux hpd 2.4.21 #1 Wed Oct 8 17:00:00 EDT 2003 i686 GNU/Linux hpd:~# ls /usr/src alsa-driver.tar kernel-source-2.4.18 alsa-modules-2.4.21_0.9.6-5+custom.3.0_i386.deb kernel-source-2.4.18.tar fglrx_panel_sources.tgz kernel-sou

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21 from unstable with woody

2003-07-01 Thread David
On Monday 30 June 2003 01:57 pm, Andre Berger wrote: > I'm trying to compile a 2.4.21 kernel on my woody system. I apt-got > -b kernel-source-2.4.21 and installed all resulting .deb files. > However when I cd to the source directory > /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.21-2.4.21 and do

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21 from unstable with woody

2003-07-01 Thread Andre Berger
pile a 2.4.21 kernel on my woody system. I apt-got > > -b kernel-source-2.4.21 and installed all resulting .deb files. >=20 > Hmm this is a little strange. What _exactly_ did you do? Like I said, plus I made a symlink /usr/src/linux to the unpacked kernel source. Had forgotten to mentio

RE: kernel-source-2.4.21 from unstable with woody

2003-07-01 Thread Detelin Batchovski
HTH -Original Message- From: Manoj Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 7:23 PM To: Detelin Batchovski Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#195031: kernel-package Hi, There seems to be a mismatch somewhere: ---

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21 from unstable with woody

2003-07-01 Thread Nick Hastings
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030701 10:13]: > I'm trying to compile a 2.4.21 kernel on my woody system. I apt-got > -b kernel-source-2.4.21 and installed all resulting .deb files. Hmm this is a little strange. What _exactly_ did you do? Normally the steps would be some

kernel-source-2.4.21 from unstable with woody

2003-06-30 Thread Andre Berger
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm trying to compile a 2.4.21 kernel on my woody system. I apt-got -b kernel-source-2.4.21 and installed all resulting .deb files. However when I cd t

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21

2003-06-25 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 05:52:07AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:43:41PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote: > > How? If you don't use the .config from a kernel-image-foo package > > already in Debian (in which case you might as well just use the > > kernel-image-foo package itself) t

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21

2003-06-24 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:43:41PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote: > How? If you don't use the .config from a kernel-image-foo package > already in Debian (in which case you might as well just use the > kernel-image-foo package itself) then any pre-compiled mo

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21

2003-06-23 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 11:21:55PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:53:10PM +0200, Marino Fernandez wrote: > > Honestly, is there any advantage on that kernel compared to the one you get > > from www.kernel.org and compile the clasic way, other than a slight ease of > > ins

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21

2003-06-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:53:10PM +0200, Marino Fernandez wrote: > On Sunday 22 June 2003 11:10 am, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:50:57PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > Anybody know what the holdup is for 2.4.21 hitting Debian? > > Honestly, is there any advantage on that k

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21

2003-06-22 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:53:10PM +0200, Marino Fernandez wrote: > Honestly, is there any advantage on that kernel compared to the one you get > from www.kernel.org and compile the clasic way, other than a slight ease of > installation. Yes. You a

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21

2003-06-22 Thread Gregory Seidman
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:53:10PM +0200, Marino Fernandez wrote: } On Sunday 22 June 2003 11:10 am, Colin Watson wrote: } > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:50:57PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: } > > Anybody know what the holdup is for 2.4.21 hitting Debian? } > } Honestly, is there any advantage on that

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21

2003-06-22 Thread Marino Fernandez
On Sunday 22 June 2003 11:10 am, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:50:57PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Anybody know what the holdup is for 2.4.21 hitting Debian? > Honestly, is there any advantage on that kernel compared to the one you get from www.kernel.org and compile the clas

Re: kernel-source-2.4.21

2003-06-22 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:50:57PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Anybody know what the holdup is for 2.4.21 hitting Debian? It's been in the incoming queue waiting for ftpmaster approval for five days. A week is usually nothing to worry about in that queue. -- Colin Watson

kernel-source-2.4.21

2003-06-22 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anybody know what the holdup is for 2.4.21 hitting Debian? - -- .''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE