Hello Colin!
Send a carbon copy of Your answers directly to me, please!
(Or else I will not see it)
CW> OK. Please don't cc me back, though. :)
Ok. :)
>> I can't compile kernel 2.2.16-22 without multi-processing support.
>> make dep goes sucessfully, make clean too.
&g
dim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Send a carbon copy of Your answers directly to me, please!
OK. Please don't cc me back, though. :)
> I can't compile kernel 2.2.16-22 without multi-processing support.
> make dep goes sucessfully, make clean too.
> But when make bzI
Hello Debian!
Send a carbon copy of Your answers directly to me, please!
I can't compile kernel 2.2.16-22 without multi-processing support.
make dep goes sucessfully, make clean too.
But when make bzImage I get "[ksyms.o] Error1" and "[first_rule]
Error2" and &qu
* Matthew Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Umum Wijoyo wrote:
>> I read in the Debian Security section, there's a serious bug
>> in the Linux kernel, and we are advised to do an upgrade. So
>> where can I find the kernel-2.2.16 source? This version is OK,
No you're not wrong. The debian packages for 2.2.15-3 address the recently
proclaimed kernel exploits in regards to the POSIX setuid issues. Kernels
for 2.0.x are not effected, 2.1.x, 2.2.x, 2.3.x users are advised to
update.
Full information is on the Debian website, linked off the main page.
Ch
I read somewhere that the 2.2.15 kernel in the current potato
distribution has already been patched with the security fixes. Am I
wrong?
Dave
> Umum Wijoyo wrote:
>>
>> I read in the Debian Security section, there's a serious bug in
>> the Linux
>> kernel, and we are advised to do an upgrade.
bug in the Linux
> kernel, and we are advised to do an upgrade.
> So where can I find the kernel-2.2.16 source? This version is OK, I
> presume?
>
Yes, the 2.2.16 kernel has the security fix.
Umum Wijoyo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I read in the Debian Security section, there's a serious bug in the Linux
> kernel, and we are advised to do an upgrade.
> So where can I find the kernel-2.2.16 source? This version is OK, I
> presume?
>
> OK! Thanks!
http://www.kernel.org/
hth,
kent
Hi,
I read in the Debian Security section, there's a serious bug in the Linux
kernel, and we are advised to do an upgrade.
So where can I find the kernel-2.2.16 source? This version is OK, I
presume?
OK! Thanks!
Umum Wijoyo
--
Bandung, Indonesia
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 10:40:55AM +0200, Sven Burgener wrote:
> Will there be a kernel-image-2.2.16 available sometime soon for dselect
> or do I have to pull down the sources myself for this?
there won't be one until the current test cycle ends i would presume.
however according to Ben Collins (
Will there be a kernel-image-2.2.16 available sometime soon for dselect
or do I have to pull down the sources myself for this?
Thanks
11 matches
Mail list logo
